 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
How does this film end? What does the prospector have to say? Does the director leaving the ending ambiguous or is one view shown to be the "real" one? 69.125.134.86 ( talk) 18:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. EvertonFC13 (talk2me) 20:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The Outrage →
The Outrage (1964 film) – Other than three "The" entries, all listings at the
Outrage disambiguation page bear the main header "Outrage". The three are this 1964 film, a feature from Thailand
The Outrage (2011 film) and a controversial TV episode
The Outrage (Marcus Welby, M.D.). Are the other two entries sufficiently notable to require this 1964 film to have a parenthetical qualifier appended? In such an eventuality,
The Outrage (film) would redirect to the
Outrage dab page.
—Roman Spinner
(talk)(contribs)
15:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This film receives 72.8% of the page views of the other topics named "The Outrage", despite being the oldest of the three. [1]-- Cúchullain t/ c 16:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cúchullain's comments. This is somewhat similar to how Matrix has its own disambiguation page, but The Matrix film exists as the primary topic when "The" is included in the search or link. Another non-film example is Joker versus The Joker. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 05:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose No reason for it. No need to make a title bigger than it needs to be. It is not being confused by another entry of similar title, and it is clear from the first sentence that the subject is a film made in 1964. Tiptoethrutheminefield ( talk) 21:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose existing situation passes both criteria for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In ictu oculi ( talk) 12:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Westerns articles
- Low-importance Westerns articles
- Start-Class Westerns (genre) film articles
- Westerns (genre) film task force articles
- WikiProject Westerns articles
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
How does this film end? What does the prospector have to say? Does the director leaving the ending ambiguous or is one view shown to be the "real" one? 69.125.134.86 ( talk) 18:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. EvertonFC13 (talk2me) 20:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The Outrage →
The Outrage (1964 film) – Other than three "The" entries, all listings at the
Outrage disambiguation page bear the main header "Outrage". The three are this 1964 film, a feature from Thailand
The Outrage (2011 film) and a controversial TV episode
The Outrage (Marcus Welby, M.D.). Are the other two entries sufficiently notable to require this 1964 film to have a parenthetical qualifier appended? In such an eventuality,
The Outrage (film) would redirect to the
Outrage dab page.
—Roman Spinner
(talk)(contribs)
15:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This film receives 72.8% of the page views of the other topics named "The Outrage", despite being the oldest of the three. [1]-- Cúchullain t/ c 16:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cúchullain's comments. This is somewhat similar to how Matrix has its own disambiguation page, but The Matrix film exists as the primary topic when "The" is included in the search or link. Another non-film example is Joker versus The Joker. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 05:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose No reason for it. No need to make a title bigger than it needs to be. It is not being confused by another entry of similar title, and it is clear from the first sentence that the subject is a film made in 1964. Tiptoethrutheminefield ( talk) 21:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose existing situation passes both criteria for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In ictu oculi ( talk) 12:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Westerns articles
- Low-importance Westerns articles
- Start-Class Westerns (genre) film articles
- Westerns (genre) film task force articles
- WikiProject Westerns articles