![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I keep getting reverted everytime I add information on the film director. We are providing information about the film on this page and who the director was is part of the article.-- CltFn 01:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
I believe the part about Akkad dying is totally irrelevant to the film page and is already discussed on both his biography and the 2005 Amman bombings. Unless Al-Qaeda has claimed it killed him for making the film (Which it has not) then it's about as relevant as the name of his daughter, his favorite color, or his blood type. Palm_Dogg 20:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I apologize, this may seem trivial. Nontheless, Wikipedia strives to be neutral. Therefore, it is more suitable to refer to Muhammad as "prophet", instead "Prophet". PJ 20:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Keep it as "The Prophet", since that is the name of the character -- Ķĩřβȳ Ťįɱé Ø 00:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Your right you are being extremely trivial or have some POV issues yourself, please do not taint Wikipedia with them.
I now soppose you will go to all Wikipedia articles regarding Prophets of Religion to impose your version of "neutrality".
Get over it and dont make POV edits under the guise of neutrality.
Taz Manchester 06:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Taz Manchester
Im thinking of editing the last line in the first paragraph to something similiar to this : Instead actors were left to talk to the camera,quote Mohammed, or say what Mohammed was believed to have said.
In some scenes they would have a messenger say what Mohammed said, and in other cases they would say "Mohammed says..."
I searched it on rottentomatoes (2 good reviews, 2 "meh") and metacritic (unlisted) and couldn't find any box office information. Anyone have sources for these?-- KingZog 07:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
is there a full article on the terrorist incident?
if not, then until there is maybe a terrorism tag (or terrorist incidents, or whatever) should go on this article.
No need for (film) dab. -- Striver 18:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
"Finally, when the film was scheduled to premier in the U.S., another Muslim extremist group staged a siege against the Washington D.C. chapter of the B'nai B'rith under the mistaken belief that Anthony Quinn played Mohammed in the film, threatening to blow up the building and its inhabitants unless the film's opening was cancelled. The standoff was resolved without explosion or injuries, though the film's American box office prospects never recovered from the unfortunate controversy." (Quotation New York Times)
This should be mentioned on the mainpage according to my judgement.
I agree that this seems important enough to include. 74.89.78.187 ( talk) 14:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
I would like to see more information on this topic. Perhaps it merits an article of its own? Too Old ( talk) 19:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Realizing that it seems vitally important to some people, I notice that the name Muhammad is spelled differently in the articla and on the title of the movie. Is this deliberately keeping the title accurate while using the latest trend in phonetic translation in the body, or should the two spellings be made to match? Xuancris ( talk) 23:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I keep getting reverted everytime I add information on the film director. We are providing information about the film on this page and who the director was is part of the article.-- CltFn 01:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
I believe the part about Akkad dying is totally irrelevant to the film page and is already discussed on both his biography and the 2005 Amman bombings. Unless Al-Qaeda has claimed it killed him for making the film (Which it has not) then it's about as relevant as the name of his daughter, his favorite color, or his blood type. Palm_Dogg 20:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I apologize, this may seem trivial. Nontheless, Wikipedia strives to be neutral. Therefore, it is more suitable to refer to Muhammad as "prophet", instead "Prophet". PJ 20:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Keep it as "The Prophet", since that is the name of the character -- Ķĩřβȳ Ťįɱé Ø 00:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Your right you are being extremely trivial or have some POV issues yourself, please do not taint Wikipedia with them.
I now soppose you will go to all Wikipedia articles regarding Prophets of Religion to impose your version of "neutrality".
Get over it and dont make POV edits under the guise of neutrality.
Taz Manchester 06:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Taz Manchester
Im thinking of editing the last line in the first paragraph to something similiar to this : Instead actors were left to talk to the camera,quote Mohammed, or say what Mohammed was believed to have said.
In some scenes they would have a messenger say what Mohammed said, and in other cases they would say "Mohammed says..."
I searched it on rottentomatoes (2 good reviews, 2 "meh") and metacritic (unlisted) and couldn't find any box office information. Anyone have sources for these?-- KingZog 07:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
is there a full article on the terrorist incident?
if not, then until there is maybe a terrorism tag (or terrorist incidents, or whatever) should go on this article.
No need for (film) dab. -- Striver 18:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
"Finally, when the film was scheduled to premier in the U.S., another Muslim extremist group staged a siege against the Washington D.C. chapter of the B'nai B'rith under the mistaken belief that Anthony Quinn played Mohammed in the film, threatening to blow up the building and its inhabitants unless the film's opening was cancelled. The standoff was resolved without explosion or injuries, though the film's American box office prospects never recovered from the unfortunate controversy." (Quotation New York Times)
This should be mentioned on the mainpage according to my judgement.
I agree that this seems important enough to include. 74.89.78.187 ( talk) 14:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
I would like to see more information on this topic. Perhaps it merits an article of its own? Too Old ( talk) 19:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Realizing that it seems vitally important to some people, I notice that the name Muhammad is spelled differently in the articla and on the title of the movie. Is this deliberately keeping the title accurate while using the latest trend in phonetic translation in the body, or should the two spellings be made to match? Xuancris ( talk) 23:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)