The Lucky Shot has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 29, 2015. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Silent / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Silent films task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Lucky Shot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 12:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC) reply

I'll read through this now and will finish this soon JAG UAR  12:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I would strongly recommend cutting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced

   I think the lead focuses too much on the plot and not enough is mentioned about the production/reception (whatever it covered on it anyway!)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

As before, this one meets the GA criteria so I'll promote it now. Well done JAG UAR  15:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply