![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I am in the process of updating this page per the template. I will get it out as soon as possible and pick up any updates between now and then in content. Portia1780 00:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Ugly. Needs desperate revision. Jachra 08:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
The summaries of the different books were obviously plagarised. Look at http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/hunchback/ and all of the different sections and compare them to this page. toaster 19:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone have any information about how it was decided that the English title would be The Hunchback of Notre Dame instead of Notre Dame de Paris, Notre Dame of Paris or what have you? I especially think its odd considering Hugo's other major work is known here as Les Miserables,nmmn... Butterboy 12:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I think the disney adaptation played a big role in this. The hunchback is juste a minor character in the original story — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:6B8E:EE00:1C39:C573:91FE:F28E ( talk) 09:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
"Book three. Hugo digresses in two long descriptions, ... His neo-Gothic viewpoints and criticism of "modernization" are explained." -- Made links. neo-Gothic currently redirects to Gothic Revival architecture. I believe that this is the correct article to link in the context of Hugo's ideas, but if not, please correct. -- Writtenonsand 12:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
On 18:03, 19 March 2007, 66.35.162.19 changed "Book two. ... Gringoire wanders the streets and finds himself in the thieves' quarter" to "Gringoire wanders the streets and finds himself in the thieves' pursey." This was apparently simple vandalism and I'm reverting it. -- Writtenonsand 12:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Reading the plot, I still am unsure how Esmerelda died. Did she dash her head on a stone, or get hanged? The text is unclear unless you already know. Wrad 01:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
She was hanged. The police found her. In the struggle, and old lady hit her head and died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaminoeyes ( talk • contribs) 04:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Who is la Sachette? Th ename is brought up once in the summary for book 11 but that's it.
I recently saw another ballet version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame on a DVD - Notre Dame de Paris - and this was by Opéra national de Paris, choreographed by Roland Petit and the composer was Maurice Jarre. Tuokkan ( talk) 21:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Isn't the book called The Hunchback of Notre-Dame?
That's the English version. Many other countries exclude 'hunchback' from their titles. The German version translates to 'the bellringer of Notre Dame.'
More description is needed in the opening concerning the summarized plot and what it's all about.
Who keeps changing the plot summary to some big mess? First, Claude Frollo wasn't 'evil' and Quasimodo loved him as a father. Second, her name is Esmeralda, not La Esmeralda. Third, she was not nice to Quasimodo after he saved her from the gibbet. Fourth, Claude never told her 'love me or be hanged.' Fourth, a gravedigger did not find Esmeralda's remains, executioners looking for a body of a man they falsely killed found her remains. She had no grave.
It wasn't falsely killed, it was a body that the king allowed to be buried in a different cemetery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.217.159 ( talk) 22:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I just read the Hunchback of Notre Dame yesterday and changed the plot summary around a little bit. You are correct about the inaccuracies of the original summary. Although, I wouldn't complain about it on the comment section, it's disrespectful to the ones who take the time to write it. If you think something is wrong with it, by all means, take the time out of your OWN day and edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherokee1002 ( talk • contribs) 22:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Who keeps adding in fake 2005 and 2009 adaptations, on both the novel's main page and the character pages? Neither of these adaptations exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Going fortheone ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
How could The Hunchback of Notre-Dame take place 11 years after it was published? This being possible doesn't seem true.
So, who is the main antagonist? Claude or Phoebus? I know how the Disney film and source material are very different from one another, but Claude's page says he became the main antagonist, yet here it gives that role to Phoebus. Which is it? 24.187.168.103 ( talk) 02:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The large section on themes looks like a cut and paste job from an unreferenced source. That's indicated by the paragraph starting "In his classic novel The Hunchback of Notre Dame...," which is redundant. It was inserted in pieces Nov. 13-18 by 8 users all of whom have no other contributions except to this article, which suggests they're all the same person and were created for this purpose. However, by now the WP page has been replicated so much that there are no search engine hits for it. Any suggestions on what to do about this? If it's not copyvio, then it sounds like it was pasted from someone's term paper. Has anybody reviewed it for accuracy? KarlM ( talk) 04:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Im trying to find examples in the book where the events in the book don't really match the time period and have been revised to make the book flow, but I'm having no luck. Has anyone noticed any situations in this book? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llove11310 ( talk • contribs) 23:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The text had Esmeralda as being the only one "to show the hunchback a moment of human kindness". I changed this to "one of the few", because at least one other person, Claude Frollo, has showed moments of kindness much larger than the one Esmeralda had with Quasimodo. Frollo took the hunchback baby when he was rejected by all the others, including the gypsies who abandoned him. The character of Frollo is so kind with the hunchback in the begining that, in order to make him a proper villain, many adaptations of the novel omitted or adulterated this part of the story. Some might say that Frollo wasn't so kind with Quasimodo at the end, but neither was Esmeralda, who was actually ungreatful with all he did to her. 177.182.25.248 ( talk) 03:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
There seems to be some disagreement re. Esmeralda's ethnicity so I'll open it up so folks can state their case. In the French text I have she is described as "l'égyptienne" (Egyptian), and my English text also says "Egyptian". Neither the words "gypsy" or "Romani" appear anywhere in either version. Mediatech492 ( talk) 07:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Nope. Wikipedia's own article on the Picaresque novel states that this distinction belongs to Lazarillo de Tormes, which, I believe is generally accepted. 2601:648:8501:EF94:4196:51E4:A845:22D9 ( talk) 20:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
The plot synopsis of this novel says that Quasimodo died of starvation; is this specified in Hugo's original French? I've ready a couple of different English translations and neither of them says that. They say only that he was not hanged and therefore must have come to that grave of his own volition. But that alone doesn't mean he must have lain there until he literally starved. He might well have done something like ingest a fatal dose of poison. I would be bold and change the synopsis myself, but since I cannot read French, I'm concerned that perhaps Hugo's actual writing does say something that really does indicate starvation. 69.75.90.210 ( talk) 03:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
I read 'Hunchback of Notre Dame' a while back and I thought he was found inside one of those hanging cages. Correct me if you think I'm wrong.-Thanks Ooh Saad ( talk) 09:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
I would think 'The Hunchback of Notre-Dame' would be more of a satire or romance rather than a 'gothic' novel? Great article by the way! Ooh Saad ( talk) 09:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
@ MCarlos I think ur newest revision needs improving cos it is vague and doesn't say what the book is about Stephanie921 ( talk) 14:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
MCarlos, I am glad the words "ableist" and "genocide" were deleted from the lead. They are not used in the article, and are so far from the meaning of the author in this novel that neither word belongs in the lead. The version of the lead here is a concise lead for this major novel of French literature. Keep in mind that the lead is meant to highlight what is written in the article; it is not an introduction to the topic nor a "blurb" to advertise it nor the lede used in news articles to give the essentials quickly for a reader. The article correctly states that Hugo wanted to stir interest in Gothic architecture with his novel. In the article in French Wikipedia, the lead is even shorter, and it remarks that the cathedral is a principal location of the novel. -- Prairieplant ( talk) 04:32, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I am in the process of updating this page per the template. I will get it out as soon as possible and pick up any updates between now and then in content. Portia1780 00:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Ugly. Needs desperate revision. Jachra 08:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
The summaries of the different books were obviously plagarised. Look at http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/hunchback/ and all of the different sections and compare them to this page. toaster 19:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone have any information about how it was decided that the English title would be The Hunchback of Notre Dame instead of Notre Dame de Paris, Notre Dame of Paris or what have you? I especially think its odd considering Hugo's other major work is known here as Les Miserables,nmmn... Butterboy 12:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I think the disney adaptation played a big role in this. The hunchback is juste a minor character in the original story — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:6B8E:EE00:1C39:C573:91FE:F28E ( talk) 09:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
"Book three. Hugo digresses in two long descriptions, ... His neo-Gothic viewpoints and criticism of "modernization" are explained." -- Made links. neo-Gothic currently redirects to Gothic Revival architecture. I believe that this is the correct article to link in the context of Hugo's ideas, but if not, please correct. -- Writtenonsand 12:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
On 18:03, 19 March 2007, 66.35.162.19 changed "Book two. ... Gringoire wanders the streets and finds himself in the thieves' quarter" to "Gringoire wanders the streets and finds himself in the thieves' pursey." This was apparently simple vandalism and I'm reverting it. -- Writtenonsand 12:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Reading the plot, I still am unsure how Esmerelda died. Did she dash her head on a stone, or get hanged? The text is unclear unless you already know. Wrad 01:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
She was hanged. The police found her. In the struggle, and old lady hit her head and died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaminoeyes ( talk • contribs) 04:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Who is la Sachette? Th ename is brought up once in the summary for book 11 but that's it.
I recently saw another ballet version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame on a DVD - Notre Dame de Paris - and this was by Opéra national de Paris, choreographed by Roland Petit and the composer was Maurice Jarre. Tuokkan ( talk) 21:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Isn't the book called The Hunchback of Notre-Dame?
That's the English version. Many other countries exclude 'hunchback' from their titles. The German version translates to 'the bellringer of Notre Dame.'
More description is needed in the opening concerning the summarized plot and what it's all about.
Who keeps changing the plot summary to some big mess? First, Claude Frollo wasn't 'evil' and Quasimodo loved him as a father. Second, her name is Esmeralda, not La Esmeralda. Third, she was not nice to Quasimodo after he saved her from the gibbet. Fourth, Claude never told her 'love me or be hanged.' Fourth, a gravedigger did not find Esmeralda's remains, executioners looking for a body of a man they falsely killed found her remains. She had no grave.
It wasn't falsely killed, it was a body that the king allowed to be buried in a different cemetery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.217.159 ( talk) 22:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I just read the Hunchback of Notre Dame yesterday and changed the plot summary around a little bit. You are correct about the inaccuracies of the original summary. Although, I wouldn't complain about it on the comment section, it's disrespectful to the ones who take the time to write it. If you think something is wrong with it, by all means, take the time out of your OWN day and edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherokee1002 ( talk • contribs) 22:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Who keeps adding in fake 2005 and 2009 adaptations, on both the novel's main page and the character pages? Neither of these adaptations exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Going fortheone ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
How could The Hunchback of Notre-Dame take place 11 years after it was published? This being possible doesn't seem true.
So, who is the main antagonist? Claude or Phoebus? I know how the Disney film and source material are very different from one another, but Claude's page says he became the main antagonist, yet here it gives that role to Phoebus. Which is it? 24.187.168.103 ( talk) 02:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The large section on themes looks like a cut and paste job from an unreferenced source. That's indicated by the paragraph starting "In his classic novel The Hunchback of Notre Dame...," which is redundant. It was inserted in pieces Nov. 13-18 by 8 users all of whom have no other contributions except to this article, which suggests they're all the same person and were created for this purpose. However, by now the WP page has been replicated so much that there are no search engine hits for it. Any suggestions on what to do about this? If it's not copyvio, then it sounds like it was pasted from someone's term paper. Has anybody reviewed it for accuracy? KarlM ( talk) 04:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Im trying to find examples in the book where the events in the book don't really match the time period and have been revised to make the book flow, but I'm having no luck. Has anyone noticed any situations in this book? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llove11310 ( talk • contribs) 23:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The text had Esmeralda as being the only one "to show the hunchback a moment of human kindness". I changed this to "one of the few", because at least one other person, Claude Frollo, has showed moments of kindness much larger than the one Esmeralda had with Quasimodo. Frollo took the hunchback baby when he was rejected by all the others, including the gypsies who abandoned him. The character of Frollo is so kind with the hunchback in the begining that, in order to make him a proper villain, many adaptations of the novel omitted or adulterated this part of the story. Some might say that Frollo wasn't so kind with Quasimodo at the end, but neither was Esmeralda, who was actually ungreatful with all he did to her. 177.182.25.248 ( talk) 03:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
There seems to be some disagreement re. Esmeralda's ethnicity so I'll open it up so folks can state their case. In the French text I have she is described as "l'égyptienne" (Egyptian), and my English text also says "Egyptian". Neither the words "gypsy" or "Romani" appear anywhere in either version. Mediatech492 ( talk) 07:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Nope. Wikipedia's own article on the Picaresque novel states that this distinction belongs to Lazarillo de Tormes, which, I believe is generally accepted. 2601:648:8501:EF94:4196:51E4:A845:22D9 ( talk) 20:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
The plot synopsis of this novel says that Quasimodo died of starvation; is this specified in Hugo's original French? I've ready a couple of different English translations and neither of them says that. They say only that he was not hanged and therefore must have come to that grave of his own volition. But that alone doesn't mean he must have lain there until he literally starved. He might well have done something like ingest a fatal dose of poison. I would be bold and change the synopsis myself, but since I cannot read French, I'm concerned that perhaps Hugo's actual writing does say something that really does indicate starvation. 69.75.90.210 ( talk) 03:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
I read 'Hunchback of Notre Dame' a while back and I thought he was found inside one of those hanging cages. Correct me if you think I'm wrong.-Thanks Ooh Saad ( talk) 09:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
I would think 'The Hunchback of Notre-Dame' would be more of a satire or romance rather than a 'gothic' novel? Great article by the way! Ooh Saad ( talk) 09:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
@ MCarlos I think ur newest revision needs improving cos it is vague and doesn't say what the book is about Stephanie921 ( talk) 14:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
MCarlos, I am glad the words "ableist" and "genocide" were deleted from the lead. They are not used in the article, and are so far from the meaning of the author in this novel that neither word belongs in the lead. The version of the lead here is a concise lead for this major novel of French literature. Keep in mind that the lead is meant to highlight what is written in the article; it is not an introduction to the topic nor a "blurb" to advertise it nor the lede used in news articles to give the essentials quickly for a reader. The article correctly states that Hugo wanted to stir interest in Gothic architecture with his novel. In the article in French Wikipedia, the lead is even shorter, and it remarks that the cathedral is a principal location of the novel. -- Prairieplant ( talk) 04:32, 1 September 2022 (UTC)