The Hawking Excitation has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 9, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was originally planning to include the following text in the article, under "Reception". However, the website from which this review come from (linked to in the reference) is on the Spam Blacklist. First of all, is there any problem with that website, or was it just blocked due to a spammer using it repeatedly? Is the review invalid, somehow? Secondly, does this mean there is something wrong with the text? Would it be appropriate to include this as I had originally planned?
The writers were also complimented for limiting screen time of guest stars, so as not to sacrifice the integrity of their writing. [1]
I wrote the website as "xaminer.com" instead of "examiner" so it won't trigger the SPB.
(The link was originally written as a reference: <ref name="Examiner">{{cite news|url=http://www.xaminer.com/review/the-big-bang-theory-the-hawking-excitation-review|title=Examiner|work=examiner.com|accessdate=April 15, 2014}}</ref>)
Bilorv (talk) 20:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC) Edited 13:53, April 21, 2014
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BenLinus1214 ( talk · contribs) 18:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I don't believe we've met. After Bahadur Shah Zafar grave dispute, I will review this next. BenLinus 1214 talk 18:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Let's get this party started! :)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Hawking Excitation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The Hawking Excitation has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 9, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was originally planning to include the following text in the article, under "Reception". However, the website from which this review come from (linked to in the reference) is on the Spam Blacklist. First of all, is there any problem with that website, or was it just blocked due to a spammer using it repeatedly? Is the review invalid, somehow? Secondly, does this mean there is something wrong with the text? Would it be appropriate to include this as I had originally planned?
The writers were also complimented for limiting screen time of guest stars, so as not to sacrifice the integrity of their writing. [1]
I wrote the website as "xaminer.com" instead of "examiner" so it won't trigger the SPB.
(The link was originally written as a reference: <ref name="Examiner">{{cite news|url=http://www.xaminer.com/review/the-big-bang-theory-the-hawking-excitation-review|title=Examiner|work=examiner.com|accessdate=April 15, 2014}}</ref>)
Bilorv (talk) 20:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC) Edited 13:53, April 21, 2014
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BenLinus1214 ( talk · contribs) 18:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I don't believe we've met. After Bahadur Shah Zafar grave dispute, I will review this next. BenLinus 1214 talk 18:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Let's get this party started! :)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Hawking Excitation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)