![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is their no category for barguides? Their should be a category and maybe a list of Famous Barguides or something like that, I think. That is what I am searching for and not finding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.242.121 ( talk) 04:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The intro states the book is noted for its "controversial tone", but this is neither given a source, nor is the point elaborated upon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.255.124.232 ( talk) 22:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Check again - it's "CONVERSATIONAL" tone, not "controversial". Tiny difference there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.44.3.112 ( talk) 16:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't know where to fit it into the recipes section but, 1/2oz = 1 part, 1oz = 2 parts...etc. Mikepellerin talk 02:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
There are several problems with this article:
Several passages in this article sound like they are blurbs or direct quotations:
There are judgements in this article that beg for substantiation; otherwise they come off as editorializing or WP:OR: "witty, highly opinionated and conversational tone".
The list of cocktail recipes doesn't seem to belong here. If these are important recipes, don't they belong in the individual cocktails' articles? -- Macrakis ( talk) 17:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is their no category for barguides? Their should be a category and maybe a list of Famous Barguides or something like that, I think. That is what I am searching for and not finding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.242.121 ( talk) 04:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The intro states the book is noted for its "controversial tone", but this is neither given a source, nor is the point elaborated upon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.255.124.232 ( talk) 22:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Check again - it's "CONVERSATIONAL" tone, not "controversial". Tiny difference there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.44.3.112 ( talk) 16:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't know where to fit it into the recipes section but, 1/2oz = 1 part, 1oz = 2 parts...etc. Mikepellerin talk 02:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
There are several problems with this article:
Several passages in this article sound like they are blurbs or direct quotations:
There are judgements in this article that beg for substantiation; otherwise they come off as editorializing or WP:OR: "witty, highly opinionated and conversational tone".
The list of cocktail recipes doesn't seem to belong here. If these are important recipes, don't they belong in the individual cocktails' articles? -- Macrakis ( talk) 17:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)