I believe that all the main characters should get their own page in the future, after we learn more about them. Also, its common and more suitable translation is Zero's Familiar, Agent=Familiar as well. Erithis 07:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
The information of the minor character Siesta can be found in the Japanese official site. However I don't know much Japanese. Would any one like to add or eidt the informations? -- Yiksung 10:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I think there should be more info about the actors in the anime too, since some authors are from Mahou sensei negima. I can do it but I never have edited/contributed in wikipedia, ( David Gonzalez 01:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC))
Tristania is not the nation , is capital of Tristain. 59.171.30.197 00:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
I think that the Places and Magic sections of the article should appear before the Characters section because they establish context for the reader to know what various terms mean, such as magic affinity. I don't think there is any reason for the characters to be listed first without explaining the concepts of the world. -- Squilibob 01:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
As shown in episode 6, Loise's (failed) fireball attack pierced the defences of a vault designed to withstand attack by Triangle-level mages. This infers that Loise is either a Square mage, or Pentagon mage due to previous referances to a fifth element in relation to Saito.
I don't think the above information is correct, so I deleted this paragraph. Louise is still a dot mage. As mentioned in the novel, her magical affinity is the fifth element - Null. That's another reason why she is named Louise the Zero.The 0% sucess rate of her spell is because she can only perform the null system magic (which she doesn't know how to perform), and she is not powerful enough to perform magic of another system. yiksung 06:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
I disagree. The level of a mage's power is based on the combination of elements, not simply the elements themselves. If Louise's affinity is void, she would still require at least another 3 elements to pierce the vault. But without the novel (or knowledge of how the anime will deviate from the novel, as it already has with the scene with Count Mott. According to the novel, Saito's Gundolf powers are activated whenever he holds a weapon, and in this case they did not). 82.12.212.238 19:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
The reason why his powers were not activated was due to the fact that the sword he was holding was meant to be a mere ornament and not a real weapon. This is revealed in the anime later on, when Saito is fighting with Fouquet's golem and the aforementioned sword is broken when used for battle. 62.1.20.28 18:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Her magic affinity simply means she had the chance to be a Pentagram mage as in legend. IINM, elements here doesn't have equal power. Among the four, Wind is the strongest. But because Void exist only in legends, nobody know about how powerful Void element is, other than it's the strongest (plus the exaggeration from being retold for generations). But from the way she destroy the vault's barrier, maybe it's enough to assume the power of a single Void element is at least equal to four elements combined. Doesn't change the fact she's a dot, she just have elements too powerful. 202.73.122.157 06:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
There is no such thing as a pentagon/pentagram mage. Louise is a Void Mage.
Order of magical element stacking:
Square Mage (Can normally cast 4 basic elements) Triangle Mage (Can normally cast 3 basic elements) Line Mage (Can normally cast 2 basic elements) Dot Mage (Can normally cast 1 basic element) Void Mage (Cannot cast any basic element, casts void magic instead.)
Also, being a triangle mage does not necessarily mean that one has to master three different elements. Tabitha and Kirche, for instance, are Wind/Wind/Wind and Fire/Fire/Fire triangle mages. Henrietta is a Water/Water/Water triangle mage.
A Void Mage is inferred to be at least as powerful as a square mage, but whether a void mage could single handedly stop an octogon-class spell is unknown. Void mages also cannot cast spells of any basic element. (Summon Servant is a spell that does not belong to any basic element.)
Also, there's a special rule for Royal Mages. Royal Mages can borrow the magical elements of one other Royal Mage and synchronize them into a combined attack. If for instance, Henrietta were to have borrowed the Prince of Wales's powers and synchronized her powers with them, the resultant spell would be a hexagon class spell (Water/Water/Water/Wind/Wind/Wind). - A Wanderer 00:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering if we should start adding information from the novels. I was thinking about adding general information about the novels like the release dates and maybe updating the character info with updated information from developments in the novels.
I would've started on this already, but I wanted to make sure that people here approved of it, as this seems like an article primarily based on the anime. RagolSlayer 03:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't that be Gandalfr? As it's based on the dwarf from Norse Mythology, similar to how the Osmond's familiar is named after the dwarf Mótsognir. Xychosis 16:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Henrietta should be marked as a major character. She has a major impact on the plot.
She is a triangle water mage. - A Wanderer 00:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I am going to have to agree with A Wanderer here, because Henrietta-sama plays a huge role in what Saito-san and Louise-chan do through-out the story. Jeffrey G. Conflict 2552 Producer 05:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
She is one of the characters that have their names featured in the opening credits in the first season, so I agree she's a main one. AngusWOOF ( talk) 19:23, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Before a revert war happens, I would like to discuss the title of episode 13 of Zero no Tsukaima.
Thus far, I prefer the name "Louise of the Void" to "Louise the Void". Someone else is clearly partial to the name of "Louise the Void", and while both translations are fairly accurate, I was wondering why in particular someone is overwriting "Louise of the Void" to "Louise the Void". I do not see why it should be titled "Louise the Void" as Louise isn't a void - she's a void mage. Being that she is a mage of the element void, it makes more sense to me that the episode would be called "Louise of the Void".
Therefore, I have reverted it back to "Louise of the Void" for the time being. If anybody disapproves, etc., please respond here on the discussion page to clear up the matter. - A Wanderer 12:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I am also going to have to agree with A Wanderer on this also because Louise-chan is not part of the Void, but she is a Void Mage. Jeffrey G. Conflict 2552 Producer 05:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Some believe here that the name is pronouned Wald and on the English subs and the animenewsnetwork.com pronounce it Ward. So what is the confusing part of how to pronounce his name?
I respect the attempt to not reveal major spoilers, but it's ridiculous to have so many spoiler warnings. It's quite annoying to see one small blurb separated from the rest just because of this. It'd be much more reasonable to just place one or two around entire sections, or instead not place spoilers at all. Besides, Wikipedia is meant to have detailed information anyway, a reader should understand that there are bound to be spoilers in such an article. KojieroSaske 04:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
One thing i notice is, is not Saito's name a spoiler in itself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.60.7.227 ( talk) 03:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Uh...Was correcting a minor error when I noticed a story section in the coding. Is that supposed to be there? Mind you, it's horribly biased and the original author had a deluge of writing mistakes, but do we need a plot summary for the current article? If so, then I'll get around to producing that and chopping the episode summaries to a smaller size. KojieroSaske 01:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Since there will be a second series starting on July 13, 2007, I think there should be cleanup to have the characters move to a character section and the episodes in an episode guide section so it can stand out more with more episodes coming soon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.118.108.222 ( talk) 19:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC).
...Because I haven't seen any major buzz on the usual Japanese websites. Even the official site itself only announces that a 2nd series is in the works and a rebroadcast of the first season will begin on April 2nd. I hope someone can prove me wrong. I heart ZeroTsuka as much as the next person... - Atashi 23:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Since the series has been licensed and the official "westernized" name has been released, shouldn't the article be moved/renamed accordingly? -- 65.93.211.18 17:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
A quick glance at the character names makes it clear that huge chunks of them are based on real people who were contemporaries, and most of whom were important characters in Dumas' Le Vicomte de Bragelonne. (Particularly Louise de la Valliere.)
Fouquet is clearly based on Nicolas Fouquet, Louis XIV's crooked minister of finance.
Chevreuse is based on Marie de Rohan-Montbazon, duchesse de Chevreuse. In the Musketeer novels, she is secretly the mother of Athos' son Raoul (the titular Vicomte of Bragelonne).
Guiche is probably based on Armand de Gramont, comte de Guiche not Antoine V, the first Duc de Guiche. He was a notorious playboy and a lover of both the Duc and Duchesse d'Orleans (Henrietta Anne Stuart), which takes some doing, and he did go after Louise de la Valliere for a while. He was a character in Twenty Years After.
Longueville: Anne Genevieve of Bourbon-Condé, duchesse de Longueville. She also was Aramis' lover in Twenty Years After.
De Wardes is a character in The Three Musketeers and Le Vicomte de Bragelonne.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.135.190.29 ( talk) 11 July 2007
Does anyone else reading the section about Louise and Saito feel that the writer is barely masking a seething hatred for Louise?
To me, "Extremely Cruel" is someone who kicks grannies and eats babies. To label Louise this seems excessive...
There seems to be a lot of focus on Louise's ill treatment towards Saito. In the show, the bad treatment, whipping (and later repeated blasting with her new found void powers) are usually light-hearted and a source of comedy, but the context of the articles seems to make it a lot more sinister.
Saying that Saito acting like a pervert is normal for his age is an overused excuse. The fact is, nobody would want someone associated with them to embarrass them in public.
Okay, so we have the traditional title of Zero no Tsukaima, the English anime-name as The Familiar of Zero and the English light novel-name as Zero's Familiar, so should we be concerned about possibly renaming this article, or just keep it as is?-- 十 八 00:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
The edited versions in Wiki that have been shown show Louise as a child like girl who is innocent in all things and uses the fact she has feelings for Saito to justify what she does to him. Her bio completely exonerates her of any and all wrong while Saito is portrayed as an uncontrollable perverted fiend who jumps on any and all things that have breasts. This is completely wrong. The meaning behind "Extremely cruel" could be to the fact that louise always enjoys it when she hits him. This can be seen quite plainly every time.
This shows to any reader that anything and everything is the fault of Saito without showing that it isn't in most cases. Being attracted to women is what a guy does. It's a fact get over it. Showing Saito nothing but pain and contempt over the whole series should not be considered romantic in any sense because of her own faults.
The way the creators portray what Louise does to Saito is in no way funny when you consider the rules of the anime world they are in. People die in the episodes (Swords/Prince, Magic/captured prisoner) so the fact she likes to strike him is all the more worse and should not be covered up with "Typical anime girl does this" to show biased opinions.
Another thing noticed is all references to how the fans enjoy Siesta as a better character than Louise being erased and instead showing her as the bad guy when she actually cares for Saito much more than Louise does. Because Louise is young is not a sufficiant excuse after the turn of the millenium. If Saito has to be considered a pervert than louise has to be called evil by their own actions. Its that simple.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.167.43.46 ( talk • contribs).
"The main courtyard of the school is known as Vestri Court."
I always thought it wasn't the name of the whole courtyard, but a part of the courtyard. In this case, the western part of the schoolgrounds.
Alex 'phoenix' Wing 10:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe this book deserves mention. It is a compilation on what the "mysterious girl" (as stated by the source itself) does when not in school. More info at the official novel information page. Jeomaxxters 17:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
There are Character CDs and OP ED CDs so is anyone going to post info on them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.76.198 ( talk) 21:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I know it is a bit strange to see me comment on an artickle like this, but ok. I have watched both seasons of the anime and I think this article really gives you the wrong impression, that is if you read this without having watched it. Look it is true that Louise treats him quite cruel and beats him the the whip, ect. But you guy's are first of all exaggerating (quite a lot) and secondly this is almost the only thing said, you go on about it so much that it looks as if the whole serie is just him getting beaten up by Louise. And everyone has to admit that a lot of times it is quite Saito's fault, and he is a bit of a pervert... The Honorable Kermanshahi ( talk) 16:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Anyway, I can't believe I watched the same thing as the writers. The Honorable Kermanshahi ( talk) 20:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused. Throughout the article and its children (e.g. episode listing), the title for the season 3 series in Romaji is interchanged several times. Is it Zero no Tsukaima: Princesses no Rondo, Zero no Tsukaima: Princesse no Rondo, or Zero no Tsukaima: Princess no Rondo? Once the true title is found, the article will have to be checked for consistency. Animeresearcher ( talk) 20:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
The Setting section is currently full of descriptions of obscure or veiled similarities between Halkeginia and Europe. This is incredibly minor information, especially for an article that is tagged as having too much plot summary. In addition, none of these noted similarities are cited, and as they are not actually spelled out in the media itself, I am considering them to be original research. I am deleting all of the offending text from the article. If you consider this unacceptable, please only add them back in if you add citations to back the claims up. 96.35.131.50 ( talk) 22:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
A comment in the " External links" section says that any non-notable fan site will be removed. What counts as a non-notable fan site? The Star Wars article lists " Star Wars - Wookieepedia – A Wiki Devoted To Star Wars" as an external link. Is " Zero no Tsukaima Wiki – A Wiki Devoted To The Familiar of Zero" acceptable? -- Article editor ( talk) 08:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Can the reception / legacy section be expanded upon to show the popularity and significance of the series in the Oricon light novel rankings? It needs sources from 2008 and earlier years to see whether it's dominated that market. Also has it won any writing awards? Also, even though the series was adapted into an anime with multiple seasons, it is difficult to assess what impact that had on the market. Once that's done, a better argument can be made to raise its level to Mid-importance. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 18:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe that all the main characters should get their own page in the future, after we learn more about them. Also, its common and more suitable translation is Zero's Familiar, Agent=Familiar as well. Erithis 07:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
The information of the minor character Siesta can be found in the Japanese official site. However I don't know much Japanese. Would any one like to add or eidt the informations? -- Yiksung 10:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I think there should be more info about the actors in the anime too, since some authors are from Mahou sensei negima. I can do it but I never have edited/contributed in wikipedia, ( David Gonzalez 01:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC))
Tristania is not the nation , is capital of Tristain. 59.171.30.197 00:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
I think that the Places and Magic sections of the article should appear before the Characters section because they establish context for the reader to know what various terms mean, such as magic affinity. I don't think there is any reason for the characters to be listed first without explaining the concepts of the world. -- Squilibob 01:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
As shown in episode 6, Loise's (failed) fireball attack pierced the defences of a vault designed to withstand attack by Triangle-level mages. This infers that Loise is either a Square mage, or Pentagon mage due to previous referances to a fifth element in relation to Saito.
I don't think the above information is correct, so I deleted this paragraph. Louise is still a dot mage. As mentioned in the novel, her magical affinity is the fifth element - Null. That's another reason why she is named Louise the Zero.The 0% sucess rate of her spell is because she can only perform the null system magic (which she doesn't know how to perform), and she is not powerful enough to perform magic of another system. yiksung 06:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
I disagree. The level of a mage's power is based on the combination of elements, not simply the elements themselves. If Louise's affinity is void, she would still require at least another 3 elements to pierce the vault. But without the novel (or knowledge of how the anime will deviate from the novel, as it already has with the scene with Count Mott. According to the novel, Saito's Gundolf powers are activated whenever he holds a weapon, and in this case they did not). 82.12.212.238 19:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
The reason why his powers were not activated was due to the fact that the sword he was holding was meant to be a mere ornament and not a real weapon. This is revealed in the anime later on, when Saito is fighting with Fouquet's golem and the aforementioned sword is broken when used for battle. 62.1.20.28 18:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Her magic affinity simply means she had the chance to be a Pentagram mage as in legend. IINM, elements here doesn't have equal power. Among the four, Wind is the strongest. But because Void exist only in legends, nobody know about how powerful Void element is, other than it's the strongest (plus the exaggeration from being retold for generations). But from the way she destroy the vault's barrier, maybe it's enough to assume the power of a single Void element is at least equal to four elements combined. Doesn't change the fact she's a dot, she just have elements too powerful. 202.73.122.157 06:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
There is no such thing as a pentagon/pentagram mage. Louise is a Void Mage.
Order of magical element stacking:
Square Mage (Can normally cast 4 basic elements) Triangle Mage (Can normally cast 3 basic elements) Line Mage (Can normally cast 2 basic elements) Dot Mage (Can normally cast 1 basic element) Void Mage (Cannot cast any basic element, casts void magic instead.)
Also, being a triangle mage does not necessarily mean that one has to master three different elements. Tabitha and Kirche, for instance, are Wind/Wind/Wind and Fire/Fire/Fire triangle mages. Henrietta is a Water/Water/Water triangle mage.
A Void Mage is inferred to be at least as powerful as a square mage, but whether a void mage could single handedly stop an octogon-class spell is unknown. Void mages also cannot cast spells of any basic element. (Summon Servant is a spell that does not belong to any basic element.)
Also, there's a special rule for Royal Mages. Royal Mages can borrow the magical elements of one other Royal Mage and synchronize them into a combined attack. If for instance, Henrietta were to have borrowed the Prince of Wales's powers and synchronized her powers with them, the resultant spell would be a hexagon class spell (Water/Water/Water/Wind/Wind/Wind). - A Wanderer 00:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering if we should start adding information from the novels. I was thinking about adding general information about the novels like the release dates and maybe updating the character info with updated information from developments in the novels.
I would've started on this already, but I wanted to make sure that people here approved of it, as this seems like an article primarily based on the anime. RagolSlayer 03:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't that be Gandalfr? As it's based on the dwarf from Norse Mythology, similar to how the Osmond's familiar is named after the dwarf Mótsognir. Xychosis 16:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Henrietta should be marked as a major character. She has a major impact on the plot.
She is a triangle water mage. - A Wanderer 00:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I am going to have to agree with A Wanderer here, because Henrietta-sama plays a huge role in what Saito-san and Louise-chan do through-out the story. Jeffrey G. Conflict 2552 Producer 05:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
She is one of the characters that have their names featured in the opening credits in the first season, so I agree she's a main one. AngusWOOF ( talk) 19:23, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Before a revert war happens, I would like to discuss the title of episode 13 of Zero no Tsukaima.
Thus far, I prefer the name "Louise of the Void" to "Louise the Void". Someone else is clearly partial to the name of "Louise the Void", and while both translations are fairly accurate, I was wondering why in particular someone is overwriting "Louise of the Void" to "Louise the Void". I do not see why it should be titled "Louise the Void" as Louise isn't a void - she's a void mage. Being that she is a mage of the element void, it makes more sense to me that the episode would be called "Louise of the Void".
Therefore, I have reverted it back to "Louise of the Void" for the time being. If anybody disapproves, etc., please respond here on the discussion page to clear up the matter. - A Wanderer 12:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I am also going to have to agree with A Wanderer on this also because Louise-chan is not part of the Void, but she is a Void Mage. Jeffrey G. Conflict 2552 Producer 05:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Some believe here that the name is pronouned Wald and on the English subs and the animenewsnetwork.com pronounce it Ward. So what is the confusing part of how to pronounce his name?
I respect the attempt to not reveal major spoilers, but it's ridiculous to have so many spoiler warnings. It's quite annoying to see one small blurb separated from the rest just because of this. It'd be much more reasonable to just place one or two around entire sections, or instead not place spoilers at all. Besides, Wikipedia is meant to have detailed information anyway, a reader should understand that there are bound to be spoilers in such an article. KojieroSaske 04:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
One thing i notice is, is not Saito's name a spoiler in itself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.60.7.227 ( talk) 03:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Uh...Was correcting a minor error when I noticed a story section in the coding. Is that supposed to be there? Mind you, it's horribly biased and the original author had a deluge of writing mistakes, but do we need a plot summary for the current article? If so, then I'll get around to producing that and chopping the episode summaries to a smaller size. KojieroSaske 01:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Since there will be a second series starting on July 13, 2007, I think there should be cleanup to have the characters move to a character section and the episodes in an episode guide section so it can stand out more with more episodes coming soon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.118.108.222 ( talk) 19:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC).
...Because I haven't seen any major buzz on the usual Japanese websites. Even the official site itself only announces that a 2nd series is in the works and a rebroadcast of the first season will begin on April 2nd. I hope someone can prove me wrong. I heart ZeroTsuka as much as the next person... - Atashi 23:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Since the series has been licensed and the official "westernized" name has been released, shouldn't the article be moved/renamed accordingly? -- 65.93.211.18 17:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
A quick glance at the character names makes it clear that huge chunks of them are based on real people who were contemporaries, and most of whom were important characters in Dumas' Le Vicomte de Bragelonne. (Particularly Louise de la Valliere.)
Fouquet is clearly based on Nicolas Fouquet, Louis XIV's crooked minister of finance.
Chevreuse is based on Marie de Rohan-Montbazon, duchesse de Chevreuse. In the Musketeer novels, she is secretly the mother of Athos' son Raoul (the titular Vicomte of Bragelonne).
Guiche is probably based on Armand de Gramont, comte de Guiche not Antoine V, the first Duc de Guiche. He was a notorious playboy and a lover of both the Duc and Duchesse d'Orleans (Henrietta Anne Stuart), which takes some doing, and he did go after Louise de la Valliere for a while. He was a character in Twenty Years After.
Longueville: Anne Genevieve of Bourbon-Condé, duchesse de Longueville. She also was Aramis' lover in Twenty Years After.
De Wardes is a character in The Three Musketeers and Le Vicomte de Bragelonne.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.135.190.29 ( talk) 11 July 2007
Does anyone else reading the section about Louise and Saito feel that the writer is barely masking a seething hatred for Louise?
To me, "Extremely Cruel" is someone who kicks grannies and eats babies. To label Louise this seems excessive...
There seems to be a lot of focus on Louise's ill treatment towards Saito. In the show, the bad treatment, whipping (and later repeated blasting with her new found void powers) are usually light-hearted and a source of comedy, but the context of the articles seems to make it a lot more sinister.
Saying that Saito acting like a pervert is normal for his age is an overused excuse. The fact is, nobody would want someone associated with them to embarrass them in public.
Okay, so we have the traditional title of Zero no Tsukaima, the English anime-name as The Familiar of Zero and the English light novel-name as Zero's Familiar, so should we be concerned about possibly renaming this article, or just keep it as is?-- 十 八 00:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
The edited versions in Wiki that have been shown show Louise as a child like girl who is innocent in all things and uses the fact she has feelings for Saito to justify what she does to him. Her bio completely exonerates her of any and all wrong while Saito is portrayed as an uncontrollable perverted fiend who jumps on any and all things that have breasts. This is completely wrong. The meaning behind "Extremely cruel" could be to the fact that louise always enjoys it when she hits him. This can be seen quite plainly every time.
This shows to any reader that anything and everything is the fault of Saito without showing that it isn't in most cases. Being attracted to women is what a guy does. It's a fact get over it. Showing Saito nothing but pain and contempt over the whole series should not be considered romantic in any sense because of her own faults.
The way the creators portray what Louise does to Saito is in no way funny when you consider the rules of the anime world they are in. People die in the episodes (Swords/Prince, Magic/captured prisoner) so the fact she likes to strike him is all the more worse and should not be covered up with "Typical anime girl does this" to show biased opinions.
Another thing noticed is all references to how the fans enjoy Siesta as a better character than Louise being erased and instead showing her as the bad guy when she actually cares for Saito much more than Louise does. Because Louise is young is not a sufficiant excuse after the turn of the millenium. If Saito has to be considered a pervert than louise has to be called evil by their own actions. Its that simple.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.167.43.46 ( talk • contribs).
"The main courtyard of the school is known as Vestri Court."
I always thought it wasn't the name of the whole courtyard, but a part of the courtyard. In this case, the western part of the schoolgrounds.
Alex 'phoenix' Wing 10:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe this book deserves mention. It is a compilation on what the "mysterious girl" (as stated by the source itself) does when not in school. More info at the official novel information page. Jeomaxxters 17:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
There are Character CDs and OP ED CDs so is anyone going to post info on them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.76.198 ( talk) 21:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I know it is a bit strange to see me comment on an artickle like this, but ok. I have watched both seasons of the anime and I think this article really gives you the wrong impression, that is if you read this without having watched it. Look it is true that Louise treats him quite cruel and beats him the the whip, ect. But you guy's are first of all exaggerating (quite a lot) and secondly this is almost the only thing said, you go on about it so much that it looks as if the whole serie is just him getting beaten up by Louise. And everyone has to admit that a lot of times it is quite Saito's fault, and he is a bit of a pervert... The Honorable Kermanshahi ( talk) 16:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Anyway, I can't believe I watched the same thing as the writers. The Honorable Kermanshahi ( talk) 20:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused. Throughout the article and its children (e.g. episode listing), the title for the season 3 series in Romaji is interchanged several times. Is it Zero no Tsukaima: Princesses no Rondo, Zero no Tsukaima: Princesse no Rondo, or Zero no Tsukaima: Princess no Rondo? Once the true title is found, the article will have to be checked for consistency. Animeresearcher ( talk) 20:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
The Setting section is currently full of descriptions of obscure or veiled similarities between Halkeginia and Europe. This is incredibly minor information, especially for an article that is tagged as having too much plot summary. In addition, none of these noted similarities are cited, and as they are not actually spelled out in the media itself, I am considering them to be original research. I am deleting all of the offending text from the article. If you consider this unacceptable, please only add them back in if you add citations to back the claims up. 96.35.131.50 ( talk) 22:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
A comment in the " External links" section says that any non-notable fan site will be removed. What counts as a non-notable fan site? The Star Wars article lists " Star Wars - Wookieepedia – A Wiki Devoted To Star Wars" as an external link. Is " Zero no Tsukaima Wiki – A Wiki Devoted To The Familiar of Zero" acceptable? -- Article editor ( talk) 08:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Can the reception / legacy section be expanded upon to show the popularity and significance of the series in the Oricon light novel rankings? It needs sources from 2008 and earlier years to see whether it's dominated that market. Also has it won any writing awards? Also, even though the series was adapted into an anime with multiple seasons, it is difficult to assess what impact that had on the market. Once that's done, a better argument can be made to raise its level to Mid-importance. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 18:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)