![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I replaced the international poster with the current US theatrical release poster. According to the MOS:FILM#Images, this poster should be included. I haven't uploaded many posters, so if someone could take a look at the file to make sure it was done right, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks. -- TravisBernard ( talk) 17:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Was it $30M or $40M? Clearly we can't say both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeAvailableName ( talk • contribs) 03:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Don't think the synopsis should necessarily spoil what the aliens look like. -- 76.106.49.3 ( talk) 17:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Most entries on Wikipedia for movies typically feature 'spoilers', from plot to character development, considering the nature of encyclopedic entries. 222.154.232.126 ( talk) 11:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
"The movie was only marginally successful. Despite grossing roughly $64,626,786 worldwide, while making over twice its budget, it's still only a lukewarm success compared to other disaster films like 2012 and Battle: Los Angeles."
This sentence in the reception section seems quite biased; The film more than doubled its budget so I'd say that's more than marginally successful. It's also slightly unfair to compare this film to 2012 and Battle: LA as both had more hype and larger budgets. -- M4roho ( talk) 06:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm from the United States, I just watched the movie on Amazon Prime Video, and I thought it was great. I heard that a movie must make 2 1/2 times its cost to break even, and this one comes close. I'm looking forward to a sequel. What's the deal with Rotten Tomatoes and 12%? Just dumb bugger eaters! Lord Milner ( talk) 05:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Well Its not my only question My next question is how they came out, from where and why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.121.212.112 ( talk) 17:21, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I replaced the international poster with the current US theatrical release poster. According to the MOS:FILM#Images, this poster should be included. I haven't uploaded many posters, so if someone could take a look at the file to make sure it was done right, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks. -- TravisBernard ( talk) 17:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Was it $30M or $40M? Clearly we can't say both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeAvailableName ( talk • contribs) 03:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Don't think the synopsis should necessarily spoil what the aliens look like. -- 76.106.49.3 ( talk) 17:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Most entries on Wikipedia for movies typically feature 'spoilers', from plot to character development, considering the nature of encyclopedic entries. 222.154.232.126 ( talk) 11:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
"The movie was only marginally successful. Despite grossing roughly $64,626,786 worldwide, while making over twice its budget, it's still only a lukewarm success compared to other disaster films like 2012 and Battle: Los Angeles."
This sentence in the reception section seems quite biased; The film more than doubled its budget so I'd say that's more than marginally successful. It's also slightly unfair to compare this film to 2012 and Battle: LA as both had more hype and larger budgets. -- M4roho ( talk) 06:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm from the United States, I just watched the movie on Amazon Prime Video, and I thought it was great. I heard that a movie must make 2 1/2 times its cost to break even, and this one comes close. I'm looking forward to a sequel. What's the deal with Rotten Tomatoes and 12%? Just dumb bugger eaters! Lord Milner ( talk) 05:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Well Its not my only question My next question is how they came out, from where and why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.121.212.112 ( talk) 17:21, 11 July 2014 (UTC)