This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why exactly do we need to be told, at the very beginning of the article, that John Wayne is killed in this movie? The comment has no citation and does nothing but ruin the ending for anybody who is about to watch the movie. It should be placed in a section below the summary - or maybe even in it. But there's no need for it at the top. I just wanted to take a look at the top of the article before watching the film, and - as a result of a doing that - I spent the whole movie knowing that John Wayne was going to be killed. This needs to be removed or moved somewhere else. - 03:47, 24 June 2020.
what is the name of the Vivaldi song played by the guitar in the movie? - 03:45, 27 May 2007 65.121.131.2
The narrative summary is excessive, and there's a lot of uncited material/ WP:OR that needs to go. DavidOaks ( talk) 14:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
(for instance, I'd have thought this [1] was a factoid worth retaining, but somebody else has a different idea, and I don't feel strongly enough about it to rv) DavidOaks ( talk) 17:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Now, friend, given your edit summary ("Guess I will go bang my head against a brick wall now") I'm suspecting you have trouble reading carefully -- I have told you several times, and quite pleasantly, I thought, that if you feel strongly about this matter, you should go ahead. Similarly I told you before to take your discussions here; finally, you seem as well to have missed this part of WP:Undue: "Undue weight applies to more than just viewpoints. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and neutral, but still be disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic" Sorry friend, I just think there are some issues of manners here. The fact that something is true is not a warrant for including it. If you think the reader will have difficulty grasping the plot without a firm conception of the ride's beginning at Beaverhead River and ending at Belle Fourche, include it. Be prepared for others to see it differently. Adios. DavidOaks ( talk) 23:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why exactly do we need to be told, at the very beginning of the article, that John Wayne is killed in this movie? The comment has no citation and does nothing but ruin the ending for anybody who is about to watch the movie. It should be placed in a section below the summary - or maybe even in it. But there's no need for it at the top. I just wanted to take a look at the top of the article before watching the film, and - as a result of a doing that - I spent the whole movie knowing that John Wayne was going to be killed. This needs to be removed or moved somewhere else. - 03:47, 24 June 2020.
what is the name of the Vivaldi song played by the guitar in the movie? - 03:45, 27 May 2007 65.121.131.2
The narrative summary is excessive, and there's a lot of uncited material/ WP:OR that needs to go. DavidOaks ( talk) 14:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
(for instance, I'd have thought this [1] was a factoid worth retaining, but somebody else has a different idea, and I don't feel strongly enough about it to rv) DavidOaks ( talk) 17:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Now, friend, given your edit summary ("Guess I will go bang my head against a brick wall now") I'm suspecting you have trouble reading carefully -- I have told you several times, and quite pleasantly, I thought, that if you feel strongly about this matter, you should go ahead. Similarly I told you before to take your discussions here; finally, you seem as well to have missed this part of WP:Undue: "Undue weight applies to more than just viewpoints. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and neutral, but still be disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic" Sorry friend, I just think there are some issues of manners here. The fact that something is true is not a warrant for including it. If you think the reader will have difficulty grasping the plot without a firm conception of the ride's beginning at Beaverhead River and ending at Belle Fourche, include it. Be prepared for others to see it differently. Adios. DavidOaks ( talk) 23:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)