This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Club (Nickelodeon) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Club" Nickelodeon – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
The Club (Nickelodeon) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for The Club (Nickelodeon): Note: Pending GA review, any objects that need to be fixed will be on the list as soon as the review is available. |
I think we need to build out a games section with all the games you can play inside Nicktropolis. -- Charlie Allnut 03:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I thought Nicktropolis was just an MMOG. I didn't know it had roleplay. GKMorse 00:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Or a juju in Pupunuunuu Village? Tak85 20:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Tak85
Where is this BackPack? i don't see it KanuT 17:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 2, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be
renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a
Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.
MrZaius
talk 17:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Per item #6 they do have an image gallery up on the site: http://www.nick.com/nicktropolis/image/ - Charlie Allnut —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie allnut ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
See top of page. Cheers, Jonathan t - c 01:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know some ingredients to make spells or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.253.99 ( talk) 17:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I propose we treat all the zones like we are doing with Nicktoons Blvd. There are so many other rooms and zones in the none Nick brand areas. I think we should expose those in the same format. Or conversely change the Nicktoons BLVD section in the article to match the other section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie allnut ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, compares against the
six good article criteria:
*Well written?:
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note below showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be
reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far.
Macys123, 18:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Providing yet another opinion, this article doesn't even come close to the Good Article criteria. Maybe with respect to the stability criteria, but that's really about it. A brief summary of some of the issues includes:
As it stands, I'd probably grade this article as Start-class. It has quite a way to go before GA-class. Dr. Cash 06:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
The article on Club Penguin seems to be similar in topic to Nicktropolis. The contributing editors might want to get some ideas from it. However, both articles seem to be Start Class. I suggest that the contributing editors look through the list of GA video games - Wikipedia:Good articles#Video games - and find one that is similar to Nicktropolis. For example, perhaps Eragon (video game) is similar. I think the editors will notice areas in Nicktropolis that could be worked on by the comparison. The editors might want to work on Club Penguin and Nicktropolis at the same time because it sometimes helps: when stuck for what to do in one, you can work on the other. Anyway, the editors seem really motivated so good luck and good work. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 17:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Quick-failing for lack of verifiability. Besides, some of last review's problems have yet to be adressed:
Also:
There are no refs...I've searched pretty much everywhere. The only possible ref would be the game; and the exact links for each room are very difficult to find. So, for now...we'll just have to try and see where we end up with testing the "nav=*" links. Jonathan T• @• C 17:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm working on a spoken article for this, it may be finished today or tomorrow. Thanks! — Jonathan 00:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
As a child, I sometimes use Nicktropolis. And I am currently very dissapointed of the person who created that page for not updating what the Floops have done to the Nicktropolis on Earth.
Pumagirl7 ( talk) 15:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I am a member of Nick Online, and viewing the official forums, I see a lot of kids complaining. And this is probably just the tip of the iceburg, as the forums are mod-previewed (Nick employees view the posts before being put up and don't feature anything innapropriate or presumably criticizing Nick). Kids are demanding the Dictionary be taken off, saying that it simply is missing many vital words (eg. Crystal). Not sure if this allowed under Wikipedia's policies, but this probably should be mentioned. What do you think? Tutthoth-Ankhre ( talk) 21:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
I am failing this page, as it seems much too short and unreferenced. Bettering the Wiki ( talk) 15:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I meant there does not seem to be enough information. Bettering the Wiki ( talk) 16:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Here's a breakdown of where this is on the GA criteria:
This article has very few flaws, and should be passed as a GA. the event horizon ( t • c) 19:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but I'm not seeing a C-class article here let alone a suitable GA candidate. There's at least one whopping gap in information and a lot of the text is meaningless to an information gatherer. Some observations:
So in the big picture: of the three major sections which virtually all video game articles should contain (gameplay, development/history and reception), two are missing entirely and one contains relatively little suitable info (history). One of the further sections needs a major overhaul (places) and the other could probably do with merging (sponsorship). Realistically this isn't a GA candidate, it would be unfair to expect the article's contributors to do this kind of work within a week. The videogame project's peer reviews and assessment dept. are there if further advice is needed and I'd heartily recommend them.
Someone
another 10:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Note I've got my wires crossed and posted this on a long-dead GA review, will tweak and cross post to a new GA review. Someone another 15:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I commented on the previous GA attempt, but made a schoolboy error and didn't check the dates, for some reason I believed there was an ongoing conversation there. I'm quick-failing Nicktropolis because there are several large gaps in the article, substantial expansion and rewriting is needed, it is currently a well-cited start-class article. Turning it around in a short timeframe would be needlessly taxing and an unrealistic goal.
Here's some suggestions:
What I'd suggest doing is:
Hope this is of some help to you, thank you for what you've done with the article. Someone another 15:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm working on a complete rewrite here. I'm heeding by these tips in the writing... The New Phobia (formerly Jonathan) 19:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
there is now a war going on nick. the battle is the autobots (my team)vs the desepicons that is all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trevor515 ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Could someone with more knowledge of the game make sense of this section from the article. I would change it myself but I couldn't figure out what the author was trying to say.
"The only section in TeeNick Point, the Naked Brothers Band, consists of the Fuzzy Room, Apartment, and The Studio. In the "Fuzzy Room", players put up a disco ball and dance. In "Apartment" users can play the guitar, piano, and drums, though this feature is no longer on, plus the jukebox that was used to hear NBB music is shown, as "destroyed". They can also play the Naked Brothers game "In Girl Trouble"[15], and listen to full-length songs, though this can no longer be used, because the jukebox is shown as destroyed. In the "Studio" users can look at the band's instruments and make a mash-up, this feature is also lost. In November 2008, an iCarly section was added with two parts of the webshow studio and Carly's apartment." Paycheckgurl ( talk) 20:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Benie21 is my guy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.19.183.217 ( talk) 18:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
when i put Edit room then i put book bag.i try to put mix but it is not working —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.167.167 ( talk) 20:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Club (Nickelodeon) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Club" Nickelodeon – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
The Club (Nickelodeon) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for The Club (Nickelodeon): Note: Pending GA review, any objects that need to be fixed will be on the list as soon as the review is available. |
I think we need to build out a games section with all the games you can play inside Nicktropolis. -- Charlie Allnut 03:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I thought Nicktropolis was just an MMOG. I didn't know it had roleplay. GKMorse 00:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Or a juju in Pupunuunuu Village? Tak85 20:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Tak85
Where is this BackPack? i don't see it KanuT 17:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 2, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be
renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a
Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.
MrZaius
talk 17:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Per item #6 they do have an image gallery up on the site: http://www.nick.com/nicktropolis/image/ - Charlie Allnut —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie allnut ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
See top of page. Cheers, Jonathan t - c 01:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know some ingredients to make spells or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.253.99 ( talk) 17:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I propose we treat all the zones like we are doing with Nicktoons Blvd. There are so many other rooms and zones in the none Nick brand areas. I think we should expose those in the same format. Or conversely change the Nicktoons BLVD section in the article to match the other section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie allnut ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, compares against the
six good article criteria:
*Well written?:
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note below showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be
reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far.
Macys123, 18:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Providing yet another opinion, this article doesn't even come close to the Good Article criteria. Maybe with respect to the stability criteria, but that's really about it. A brief summary of some of the issues includes:
As it stands, I'd probably grade this article as Start-class. It has quite a way to go before GA-class. Dr. Cash 06:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
The article on Club Penguin seems to be similar in topic to Nicktropolis. The contributing editors might want to get some ideas from it. However, both articles seem to be Start Class. I suggest that the contributing editors look through the list of GA video games - Wikipedia:Good articles#Video games - and find one that is similar to Nicktropolis. For example, perhaps Eragon (video game) is similar. I think the editors will notice areas in Nicktropolis that could be worked on by the comparison. The editors might want to work on Club Penguin and Nicktropolis at the same time because it sometimes helps: when stuck for what to do in one, you can work on the other. Anyway, the editors seem really motivated so good luck and good work. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 17:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Quick-failing for lack of verifiability. Besides, some of last review's problems have yet to be adressed:
Also:
There are no refs...I've searched pretty much everywhere. The only possible ref would be the game; and the exact links for each room are very difficult to find. So, for now...we'll just have to try and see where we end up with testing the "nav=*" links. Jonathan T• @• C 17:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm working on a spoken article for this, it may be finished today or tomorrow. Thanks! — Jonathan 00:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
As a child, I sometimes use Nicktropolis. And I am currently very dissapointed of the person who created that page for not updating what the Floops have done to the Nicktropolis on Earth.
Pumagirl7 ( talk) 15:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I am a member of Nick Online, and viewing the official forums, I see a lot of kids complaining. And this is probably just the tip of the iceburg, as the forums are mod-previewed (Nick employees view the posts before being put up and don't feature anything innapropriate or presumably criticizing Nick). Kids are demanding the Dictionary be taken off, saying that it simply is missing many vital words (eg. Crystal). Not sure if this allowed under Wikipedia's policies, but this probably should be mentioned. What do you think? Tutthoth-Ankhre ( talk) 21:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
I am failing this page, as it seems much too short and unreferenced. Bettering the Wiki ( talk) 15:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I meant there does not seem to be enough information. Bettering the Wiki ( talk) 16:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Here's a breakdown of where this is on the GA criteria:
This article has very few flaws, and should be passed as a GA. the event horizon ( t • c) 19:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but I'm not seeing a C-class article here let alone a suitable GA candidate. There's at least one whopping gap in information and a lot of the text is meaningless to an information gatherer. Some observations:
So in the big picture: of the three major sections which virtually all video game articles should contain (gameplay, development/history and reception), two are missing entirely and one contains relatively little suitable info (history). One of the further sections needs a major overhaul (places) and the other could probably do with merging (sponsorship). Realistically this isn't a GA candidate, it would be unfair to expect the article's contributors to do this kind of work within a week. The videogame project's peer reviews and assessment dept. are there if further advice is needed and I'd heartily recommend them.
Someone
another 10:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Note I've got my wires crossed and posted this on a long-dead GA review, will tweak and cross post to a new GA review. Someone another 15:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I commented on the previous GA attempt, but made a schoolboy error and didn't check the dates, for some reason I believed there was an ongoing conversation there. I'm quick-failing Nicktropolis because there are several large gaps in the article, substantial expansion and rewriting is needed, it is currently a well-cited start-class article. Turning it around in a short timeframe would be needlessly taxing and an unrealistic goal.
Here's some suggestions:
What I'd suggest doing is:
Hope this is of some help to you, thank you for what you've done with the article. Someone another 15:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm working on a complete rewrite here. I'm heeding by these tips in the writing... The New Phobia (formerly Jonathan) 19:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
there is now a war going on nick. the battle is the autobots (my team)vs the desepicons that is all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trevor515 ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Could someone with more knowledge of the game make sense of this section from the article. I would change it myself but I couldn't figure out what the author was trying to say.
"The only section in TeeNick Point, the Naked Brothers Band, consists of the Fuzzy Room, Apartment, and The Studio. In the "Fuzzy Room", players put up a disco ball and dance. In "Apartment" users can play the guitar, piano, and drums, though this feature is no longer on, plus the jukebox that was used to hear NBB music is shown, as "destroyed". They can also play the Naked Brothers game "In Girl Trouble"[15], and listen to full-length songs, though this can no longer be used, because the jukebox is shown as destroyed. In the "Studio" users can look at the band's instruments and make a mash-up, this feature is also lost. In November 2008, an iCarly section was added with two parts of the webshow studio and Carly's apartment." Paycheckgurl ( talk) 20:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Benie21 is my guy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.19.183.217 ( talk) 18:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
when i put Edit room then i put book bag.i try to put mix but it is not working —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.167.167 ( talk) 20:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)