This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
I've removed the "citation needed" tag from the following statement, along with the cited source which does not support that statement: "GamePro and Game Players gave it only brief reviews, while other gaming publications such as Electronic Gaming Monthly, GameSpot and Next Generation gave it no coverage at all beyond early previews." I thought this would be obvious, but the chance of there being a source which states a negative like this is virtually 0%. If you don't believe me when I say that these publications never reviewed The Amazing Spider-Man: Web of Fire or otherwise gave it any coverage in the 32X's final months, then just remove the statement; I won't try to stop you.
WP:No original research says that original research should be removed, not tagged.
Martin IIIa (
talk)
14:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
I've removed the "citation needed" tag from the following statement, along with the cited source which does not support that statement: "GamePro and Game Players gave it only brief reviews, while other gaming publications such as Electronic Gaming Monthly, GameSpot and Next Generation gave it no coverage at all beyond early previews." I thought this would be obvious, but the chance of there being a source which states a negative like this is virtually 0%. If you don't believe me when I say that these publications never reviewed The Amazing Spider-Man: Web of Fire or otherwise gave it any coverage in the 32X's final months, then just remove the statement; I won't try to stop you.
WP:No original research says that original research should be removed, not tagged.
Martin IIIa (
talk)
14:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)reply