This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Amazing Race 31 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I know Phil says "I'm at the start..." in that instragram thing, but you'll note the camera does a full 360 pan and there's clearly no racers/start line visible (maybe this was before they are brought in by some means, such as boat? Regardless, I do think the pier is clearly identifable from that pan -we can name the starting city from that, but whether that's actually the "start line" is unclear. -- Masem ( t) 14:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
CBS had permits for Belle Isle in Detroit for July 3 but have had to do reworking. This may not have to do with the current race, but if it ends up there, we can include this in the article. -- Masem ( t) 14:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Due to the constant edits to change relationships that we do not know until the first episode actually airs, I've commented out the results table. We have the cast list in the casting section that works for now. -- Masem ( t) 00:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I was browsing through the press released pictures and noticed that there seemed to be a task involving the jellyfish kites on Hermosa Beach. Link to an album with the associated images: https://imgur.com/a/3TpxYsU. (Proof that the images are from the press release: https://cbspressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/the-amazing-race/photos) Sinjoh2015 ( talk) 23:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
It was to find the "extreme roadblock" power. Apparently, it wasn't shown because it never got used. jr0929 22:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the show itself is not identifying teams by their status with the chevrons (focusing more on their original show), so the question of whether to present Nicole & Victor as "dating" or "engaged" remains up in the air. However, last night's episode, Victor definitely called Nicole his girlfriend, and this article [1] about how they fell in love and that the engagement came on BB20 after they ran the race, I really think we should be listing this as "dating" as that is 100% what they were when they ran the race, with the footnote to establish the engagement. -- Masem ( t) 14:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm reviving this, since clearly a consensus wasn't reached. Can we at least agree if the show doesn't label the teams' relationships, then the bios released on CBS, that are written by the teams are fair game to use?
Sinjoh2015 (
talk)
17:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Last night's episode had a U-Turn vote, where each team voted for another team to receive a U-Turn. I don't think it's necessary to include established U-Turn symbols, except for the two teams who received it as there is a table for more details. 9March2019 ( talk) 20:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
A few editors have included the trivia of The Amazing Race Vietnam being the first edition of The Amazing Race to visit Laos prior to this season's visit, yet user Sportsfan 1234 keeps insisting that this information doesn't matter but provides no reason as to why it doesn't matter. Saying, "no need to mention other" is just a statement and is neither a reason nor an explanation for removal of the information. I have explained why I feel this information is important as The Amazing Race Vietnam is an Amazing Race franchise, which lists Bertram Van Munster, Elise Doganieri, and Jerry Bruckheimer in its credits meaning that it has an affiliation with CBS's The Amazing Race, so "[i]t is not reasonable to disallow all information that some editors feel is unimportant, because that information could be important to some readers" under the guidelines of Wikipedia:Handling trivia. I have provided sources as required under the policy and mentioned by user Masem, yet Sportsfan 1234 did not follow the Wikipedia:Disruptive editing policy of "[i]f sourced information appears this time around, do nothing" and has not done the step of ensuring "that a clear explanation for the difference in opinion is posted...at the article talkpage." Sportsfan 1234 said that I violated the disruptive editing policy and instructed me to be "familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive", yet isn't following said policy to resolve a dispute. Xoruz ( talk) 05:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Sportsfan 1234 Over the course of my multiple edits that attempt to correct the false information on this page, I have explained succinctly my reasoning for why it needs to be changed and why it can't stay the way it is. You, however, continue to revert without offering any kind of rebuttal. USE YOUR FUCKING WORDS. The statement on this page about Laos is provably false. There are multiple different ways the statement could be altered so that it is no longer false, whether we mention TAR Vietnam or don't, but you have rejected all of them all with reverts that lack any edit summary. I refuse to let a false statement remain on this page, so please use your fucking words and decide on a way the statement can be altered so that it is no longer false. How do you respond? TheNewLayoutReallySucks ( talk) 04:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Amazing Race 31 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I know Phil says "I'm at the start..." in that instragram thing, but you'll note the camera does a full 360 pan and there's clearly no racers/start line visible (maybe this was before they are brought in by some means, such as boat? Regardless, I do think the pier is clearly identifable from that pan -we can name the starting city from that, but whether that's actually the "start line" is unclear. -- Masem ( t) 14:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
CBS had permits for Belle Isle in Detroit for July 3 but have had to do reworking. This may not have to do with the current race, but if it ends up there, we can include this in the article. -- Masem ( t) 14:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Due to the constant edits to change relationships that we do not know until the first episode actually airs, I've commented out the results table. We have the cast list in the casting section that works for now. -- Masem ( t) 00:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I was browsing through the press released pictures and noticed that there seemed to be a task involving the jellyfish kites on Hermosa Beach. Link to an album with the associated images: https://imgur.com/a/3TpxYsU. (Proof that the images are from the press release: https://cbspressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/the-amazing-race/photos) Sinjoh2015 ( talk) 23:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
It was to find the "extreme roadblock" power. Apparently, it wasn't shown because it never got used. jr0929 22:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the show itself is not identifying teams by their status with the chevrons (focusing more on their original show), so the question of whether to present Nicole & Victor as "dating" or "engaged" remains up in the air. However, last night's episode, Victor definitely called Nicole his girlfriend, and this article [1] about how they fell in love and that the engagement came on BB20 after they ran the race, I really think we should be listing this as "dating" as that is 100% what they were when they ran the race, with the footnote to establish the engagement. -- Masem ( t) 14:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm reviving this, since clearly a consensus wasn't reached. Can we at least agree if the show doesn't label the teams' relationships, then the bios released on CBS, that are written by the teams are fair game to use?
Sinjoh2015 (
talk)
17:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Last night's episode had a U-Turn vote, where each team voted for another team to receive a U-Turn. I don't think it's necessary to include established U-Turn symbols, except for the two teams who received it as there is a table for more details. 9March2019 ( talk) 20:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
A few editors have included the trivia of The Amazing Race Vietnam being the first edition of The Amazing Race to visit Laos prior to this season's visit, yet user Sportsfan 1234 keeps insisting that this information doesn't matter but provides no reason as to why it doesn't matter. Saying, "no need to mention other" is just a statement and is neither a reason nor an explanation for removal of the information. I have explained why I feel this information is important as The Amazing Race Vietnam is an Amazing Race franchise, which lists Bertram Van Munster, Elise Doganieri, and Jerry Bruckheimer in its credits meaning that it has an affiliation with CBS's The Amazing Race, so "[i]t is not reasonable to disallow all information that some editors feel is unimportant, because that information could be important to some readers" under the guidelines of Wikipedia:Handling trivia. I have provided sources as required under the policy and mentioned by user Masem, yet Sportsfan 1234 did not follow the Wikipedia:Disruptive editing policy of "[i]f sourced information appears this time around, do nothing" and has not done the step of ensuring "that a clear explanation for the difference in opinion is posted...at the article talkpage." Sportsfan 1234 said that I violated the disruptive editing policy and instructed me to be "familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive", yet isn't following said policy to resolve a dispute. Xoruz ( talk) 05:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Sportsfan 1234 Over the course of my multiple edits that attempt to correct the false information on this page, I have explained succinctly my reasoning for why it needs to be changed and why it can't stay the way it is. You, however, continue to revert without offering any kind of rebuttal. USE YOUR FUCKING WORDS. The statement on this page about Laos is provably false. There are multiple different ways the statement could be altered so that it is no longer false, whether we mention TAR Vietnam or don't, but you have rejected all of them all with reverts that lack any edit summary. I refuse to let a false statement remain on this page, so please use your fucking words and decide on a way the statement can be altered so that it is no longer false. How do you respond? TheNewLayoutReallySucks ( talk) 04:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)