![]() | Tharsis (video game) has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 2, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Tharsis (video game) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 October 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 19:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria- ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
It contains copyright infringements- cooydetector is down, but I couldn't find any manually. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).- ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.- ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Tharsis (video game) has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 2, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Tharsis (video game) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 October 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 19:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria- ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
It contains copyright infringements- cooydetector is down, but I couldn't find any manually. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).- ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.- ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)