This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Thank You for Smoking article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was move per request as to the main request as the primary topic based on page views evidence. However, as to the second part, we do not need to make a dab page when there is a primary topic, and a hatnote will be placed instead. See WP:TWODABS. The opposition has been discounted as not relevant to application of the policy but rather a statement against the primary topic policy itself. That is a discussion, if at all, for Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation or another relevant forum.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 15:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
– Only two topics and the film is far more notable. It features far more information and actually has references: the book doesn't contain a single one. Unreal7 ( talk) 15:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Thank You for Smoking article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was move per request as to the main request as the primary topic based on page views evidence. However, as to the second part, we do not need to make a dab page when there is a primary topic, and a hatnote will be placed instead. See WP:TWODABS. The opposition has been discounted as not relevant to application of the policy but rather a statement against the primary topic policy itself. That is a discussion, if at all, for Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation or another relevant forum.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 15:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
– Only two topics and the film is far more notable. It features far more information and actually has references: the book doesn't contain a single one. Unreal7 ( talk) 15:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)