This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Record Labels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Most important: It needs to cite sources. As it is, it is impossible for a reader to find out where to go to find corroboration that this institution exists at all. Examples of sources are newspaper articles referring to it, official registrations of the organization, and so on.

Second, it needs to establish why it is worthy of a listing on Wikipedia. If it has published records of notable artists, name them and link to them. Again, sources (outside Wikipedia) are important.

Third, the tone needs work. If the article is to use a loaded term like "unique", it needs to give some evidence that someone (apart from the participants) thinks that it's unique, and (again) a source showing where the claim for uniqueness is made.

Once it's long enough not to be a stub, the stub label should be taken off and be replaced with category links. There are probably half a dozen categories it belongs in.

Once that's done - it should be a good article... -- Alvestrand 17:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC) reply