![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose this article for deletion. Reason: wp:OR and WP:Undue. The view that there was a Teispid dynasty is a minority view and according to the Wikipedia:deletion that "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline" this article does not belong to Wikipedia. Moreover, the article falsifies the source: that Cyrus I, Cambyses I, and Cyrus II are called by some Teispid. This article does OR to include their sons and grandsons as well. Tthis article is too short and can be put somewhere else if the viewpoint deserve mention (though in wikipedia non consensus view should not be given any weight). If you remove the deletion Tag, please explain the reason. Xashaiar ( talk) 16:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
What is the reason for adding a disputed tag? Ellipi ( talk) 23:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
What is clear, there are some historians suggesting that the Achaemenid dynasty was founded by Darius. They suggest that inscriptions asserting that Cyrus is an Achaemenid were engraved at the time of later Achaemenid kings. However, this is only one theory, and not all historians support this theory. Still most historian consider Cyrus, as the founder of the Achaemenid dynasty. Considering this fact, creating an entirely new article for Teispids looks like
POV fork to me. At this point, I would rather merge this article with
Achaemenids. In future, the first theory may gain more popularity among scholars, but at this point is the minority theory and do not need a separate article.--
WIMYV? (
talk)
01:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Teispids don't exist in any rational scientific literature, this is original research made by one Wiki editor based on minority scholar hypothesis. There is only one option - delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.191.41 ( talk) 01:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Please note that many users & visitors are looking for information about new ideas & theories. Therefore if we convert the title of this article to "Teispids theory" (or such this words) it will be useful for users of wikipedia & it can be undeleted. ( Maziargh Aug. 4, 2010. —Preceding undated comment added 06:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC).
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Cyrus cilinder.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 14:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose this article for deletion. Reason: wp:OR and WP:Undue. The view that there was a Teispid dynasty is a minority view and according to the Wikipedia:deletion that "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline" this article does not belong to Wikipedia. Moreover, the article falsifies the source: that Cyrus I, Cambyses I, and Cyrus II are called by some Teispid. This article does OR to include their sons and grandsons as well. Tthis article is too short and can be put somewhere else if the viewpoint deserve mention (though in wikipedia non consensus view should not be given any weight). If you remove the deletion Tag, please explain the reason. Xashaiar ( talk) 16:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
What is the reason for adding a disputed tag? Ellipi ( talk) 23:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
What is clear, there are some historians suggesting that the Achaemenid dynasty was founded by Darius. They suggest that inscriptions asserting that Cyrus is an Achaemenid were engraved at the time of later Achaemenid kings. However, this is only one theory, and not all historians support this theory. Still most historian consider Cyrus, as the founder of the Achaemenid dynasty. Considering this fact, creating an entirely new article for Teispids looks like
POV fork to me. At this point, I would rather merge this article with
Achaemenids. In future, the first theory may gain more popularity among scholars, but at this point is the minority theory and do not need a separate article.--
WIMYV? (
talk)
01:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Teispids don't exist in any rational scientific literature, this is original research made by one Wiki editor based on minority scholar hypothesis. There is only one option - delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.191.41 ( talk) 01:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Please note that many users & visitors are looking for information about new ideas & theories. Therefore if we convert the title of this article to "Teispids theory" (or such this words) it will be useful for users of wikipedia & it can be undeleted. ( Maziargh Aug. 4, 2010. —Preceding undated comment added 06:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC).
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Cyrus cilinder.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 14:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC) |