Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tech Squares article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Possible sources include:
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There were objections to an earlier version of the Tech Squares article. Those objections have been resolved, and so that discussion has been archived. C. Scott Ananian 21:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The article, while reasonably well-written, has some fundamental flaws that may make it unsuitable for wikipedia. First, the article does not state the importance of the topic; why is this square-dancing club sufficiently notable to warrant inclusion in wikipedia? Second, it appears that many parts of the article are full of unverifiable, uncited, or original research claims despite the referenced sources at the bottom of the article. Madcoverboy 19:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the timeline as it is unsourced and trivial. WP tan 1999 ( talk) 20:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
It could attract editors to improve this article, if it was listed in appropriate WikiProjects. Please add some. Lentower ( talk) 23:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tech Squares article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Possible sources include:
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There were objections to an earlier version of the Tech Squares article. Those objections have been resolved, and so that discussion has been archived. C. Scott Ananian 21:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The article, while reasonably well-written, has some fundamental flaws that may make it unsuitable for wikipedia. First, the article does not state the importance of the topic; why is this square-dancing club sufficiently notable to warrant inclusion in wikipedia? Second, it appears that many parts of the article are full of unverifiable, uncited, or original research claims despite the referenced sources at the bottom of the article. Madcoverboy 19:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the timeline as it is unsourced and trivial. WP tan 1999 ( talk) 20:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
It could attract editors to improve this article, if it was listed in appropriate WikiProjects. Please add some. Lentower ( talk) 23:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)