![]() | Tana Tidung Regency has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 29, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Tana Tidung Regency is the smallest regency by land area in
North Kalimantan and has the province's lowest poverty rate? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PCN02WPS ( talk · contribs) 17:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'll be reviewing this article shortly.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 17:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
I've left comments on each of the article's sections, so I'll place the nominations on hold to give you time to address them. No rush. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 03:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
The lead is fine, if not a little short; perhaps a bit from the "history" section could be placed there before "created in 2007" as a bit of context.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | I made a few minor edits to clean up minor grammar issues, so I have no issues with grammar that I can see. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | There are a few instances of weasel words, particularly the phrase "it is believed that..." or the like. I have tagged the two instances I found with {{ By whom}} in hopes that they can be clarified. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | There are a few paragraphs, namely in the early history section, that go quite a ways without a citation. In that particular section, the first paragraph goes from "Another kingdom, Berayu..." to "...the help of the Dutch in 1916" with just two citations after the latter sentence. Is all of that information covered by those two references? |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig gave a 0.0% similarity. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images are used properly; no fair use. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Nomination remains on hold pending the comments in the table above. |
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 06:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Created by Nyanardsan ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Thank you,
Nyanardsan for a thorough and careful article on a region of Indonesia. It was promoted to GA on 10 January 2021. The hook has 129 characters and is repeated in the article; both cases are cited, and both cases are offline, therefore taken AGF.
Just one issue: QPQ pending. When that is done, this nom should be good to go.
Storye book (
talk) 16:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Tana Tidung Regency has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 29, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Tana Tidung Regency is the smallest regency by land area in
North Kalimantan and has the province's lowest poverty rate? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PCN02WPS ( talk · contribs) 17:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'll be reviewing this article shortly.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 17:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
I've left comments on each of the article's sections, so I'll place the nominations on hold to give you time to address them. No rush. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 03:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
The lead is fine, if not a little short; perhaps a bit from the "history" section could be placed there before "created in 2007" as a bit of context.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | I made a few minor edits to clean up minor grammar issues, so I have no issues with grammar that I can see. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | There are a few instances of weasel words, particularly the phrase "it is believed that..." or the like. I have tagged the two instances I found with {{ By whom}} in hopes that they can be clarified. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | There are a few paragraphs, namely in the early history section, that go quite a ways without a citation. In that particular section, the first paragraph goes from "Another kingdom, Berayu..." to "...the help of the Dutch in 1916" with just two citations after the latter sentence. Is all of that information covered by those two references? |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig gave a 0.0% similarity. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images are used properly; no fair use. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Nomination remains on hold pending the comments in the table above. |
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 06:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Created by Nyanardsan ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Thank you,
Nyanardsan for a thorough and careful article on a region of Indonesia. It was promoted to GA on 10 January 2021. The hook has 129 characters and is repeated in the article; both cases are cited, and both cases are offline, therefore taken AGF.
Just one issue: QPQ pending. When that is done, this nom should be good to go.
Storye book (
talk) 16:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)