![]() | Talim (Soulcalibur) has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 3, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
![]() | Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC).
It doesn't say Samar anywhere on her character profile. Blueknightex ( talk) 08:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
None of these things was ever named "Talim (Soul series)". -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 12:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Talim (Soul series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
SNAAAAKE!! ( talk) 09:02, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please can someone exchange Category:Fictional melee weapons practitioners for Category:Fictional tonfajutsuka. Her melee weapons are tonfa. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.189.154.193 ( talk) 18:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Kung Fu Man ( talk · contribs) 22:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 03:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Will take this on in the coming days.
Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (
talk)
03:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the character.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale.
-Looks good
-Looks good (Though is the bust size really necessary info?)
-Looks good
-Looks good (Though admittedly the fact this sexualization paragraph exists at all is concerning... I really hope that isn't still a thing.)
-Article is in good quality and covers all relevant points of the character's reception. My only real complaints are nitpicks, so I'm happy to pass it as it stands. Well done. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 23:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Talim (Soulcalibur) has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 3, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
![]() | Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC).
It doesn't say Samar anywhere on her character profile. Blueknightex ( talk) 08:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
None of these things was ever named "Talim (Soul series)". -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 12:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Talim (Soul series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
SNAAAAKE!! ( talk) 09:02, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please can someone exchange Category:Fictional melee weapons practitioners for Category:Fictional tonfajutsuka. Her melee weapons are tonfa. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.189.154.193 ( talk) 18:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Kung Fu Man ( talk · contribs) 22:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 03:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Will take this on in the coming days.
Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (
talk)
03:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the character.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale.
-Looks good
-Looks good (Though is the bust size really necessary info?)
-Looks good
-Looks good (Though admittedly the fact this sexualization paragraph exists at all is concerning... I really hope that isn't still a thing.)
-Article is in good quality and covers all relevant points of the character's reception. My only real complaints are nitpicks, so I'm happy to pass it as it stands. Well done. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 23:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)