![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Because of a redirect, a move and a merge, the edit history of this article can be found in the following locations:
Hoverfish Talk 16:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
It is extremely unlikely that there will any academically reviewed or other English-language sources on this subject beyond those associated directly with the subject, or by followers of Meher Baba. That said, however, the sources cited do appear to satisfy the essential criteria referencing found here. I'm specifically mindful of these elements, which apply to self-published sources:
So I'm removing the "reliable sources" tag, as it suggests that this article is somehow unreliable or dubious. It's about a notable subject, well known in India, interesting to a fairly rarefied bunch of Westerners, and unlikely ever to have more information unless and until WP provides an outlet for Original Research. -- nemonoman ( talk) 13:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
A recent addition to the article has the following issues: 1- the timeline of the article is not in order, 2- the section titles do not describe the content, 3- the tone of writing contains devotional titles and abbreviations that are not appropriate for wikipedia content. Hoverfish Talk 12:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
I had to hide the section on caliphs, because the way it was written was not coherent. Please, edit it carefully so that it becomes clear to the reader who is who and who came after whom and who is the caliph today. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 11:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
I have reworked the section and reinserted the edited text. However, the citation given does not cover the text given, so it is necessary to find a citation that covers all thse caliph statements. Hoverfish Talk 12:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Why is his name moved to Baba Tajuddin, when his name is Tajuddin Baba in the article? This only causes confusion. The honorific 'Baba' usually comes second in such names? It should at least be consistent with the way it is in the article itself. Currently the reverse is not explained. Perhaps it should be changed in the articled to match the article header. Dazedbythebell ( talk) 21:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I strongly suggest this page be moved back to Hazrat Tajuddin Baba. If the "Hazrat" is not appropriate (for some reason discussed here), then to be moved to Tajuddin Baba. Hoverfish Talk 21:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
I did not want to mark up the article with 'citation needed' or a banner at the top, which could take a long time to remove, but wanted to point out here that this article is badly in need of some citations. If anyone knows of a printed book that has information on Tajuddin, please help. Dazedbythebell ( talk) 23:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
I have moved the page back to its original place, as per the discussion above under Baba First?. A google search shows Tajuddin is known by many names, yet on Wikipedia 270 articles link to "Hazrat Tajuddin Baba.". Also it had been moved by a first time user in good faith who did not know that such a move requires discussion and consensus. One suggestion is that other names be given for Tajuddin. However, a search for names on Google reveals so many names it would be difficult to know which to choose in a list. Among many names he is called Baba Tajuddin Aulia and Hazrat Syed Mohammed Baba Tajuddin Aulia, and there are other versions. However, the name as given as the article header is the most common on Google. [4] Dazedbythebell ( talk) 15:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I deleted the section added by Danice thrall that was copied and pasted from Perfect Master (Meher Baba)#The Five Perfect Masters, an article on the teachings of Meher Baba. That is a teaching by Meher Baba, and does not belong in the Wikipedia article about Tajuddin Baba. Dazedbythebell ( talk)
Tajuddin baba dargah pics i have added ...But Wikipedia deleted my pics Plz add my pics on Gallery Syed Shizan Taji ( talk) 13:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Because of a redirect, a move and a merge, the edit history of this article can be found in the following locations:
Hoverfish Talk 16:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
It is extremely unlikely that there will any academically reviewed or other English-language sources on this subject beyond those associated directly with the subject, or by followers of Meher Baba. That said, however, the sources cited do appear to satisfy the essential criteria referencing found here. I'm specifically mindful of these elements, which apply to self-published sources:
So I'm removing the "reliable sources" tag, as it suggests that this article is somehow unreliable or dubious. It's about a notable subject, well known in India, interesting to a fairly rarefied bunch of Westerners, and unlikely ever to have more information unless and until WP provides an outlet for Original Research. -- nemonoman ( talk) 13:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
A recent addition to the article has the following issues: 1- the timeline of the article is not in order, 2- the section titles do not describe the content, 3- the tone of writing contains devotional titles and abbreviations that are not appropriate for wikipedia content. Hoverfish Talk 12:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
I had to hide the section on caliphs, because the way it was written was not coherent. Please, edit it carefully so that it becomes clear to the reader who is who and who came after whom and who is the caliph today. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 11:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
I have reworked the section and reinserted the edited text. However, the citation given does not cover the text given, so it is necessary to find a citation that covers all thse caliph statements. Hoverfish Talk 12:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Why is his name moved to Baba Tajuddin, when his name is Tajuddin Baba in the article? This only causes confusion. The honorific 'Baba' usually comes second in such names? It should at least be consistent with the way it is in the article itself. Currently the reverse is not explained. Perhaps it should be changed in the articled to match the article header. Dazedbythebell ( talk) 21:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I strongly suggest this page be moved back to Hazrat Tajuddin Baba. If the "Hazrat" is not appropriate (for some reason discussed here), then to be moved to Tajuddin Baba. Hoverfish Talk 21:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
I did not want to mark up the article with 'citation needed' or a banner at the top, which could take a long time to remove, but wanted to point out here that this article is badly in need of some citations. If anyone knows of a printed book that has information on Tajuddin, please help. Dazedbythebell ( talk) 23:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
I have moved the page back to its original place, as per the discussion above under Baba First?. A google search shows Tajuddin is known by many names, yet on Wikipedia 270 articles link to "Hazrat Tajuddin Baba.". Also it had been moved by a first time user in good faith who did not know that such a move requires discussion and consensus. One suggestion is that other names be given for Tajuddin. However, a search for names on Google reveals so many names it would be difficult to know which to choose in a list. Among many names he is called Baba Tajuddin Aulia and Hazrat Syed Mohammed Baba Tajuddin Aulia, and there are other versions. However, the name as given as the article header is the most common on Google. [4] Dazedbythebell ( talk) 15:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I deleted the section added by Danice thrall that was copied and pasted from Perfect Master (Meher Baba)#The Five Perfect Masters, an article on the teachings of Meher Baba. That is a teaching by Meher Baba, and does not belong in the Wikipedia article about Tajuddin Baba. Dazedbythebell ( talk)
Tajuddin baba dargah pics i have added ...But Wikipedia deleted my pics Plz add my pics on Gallery Syed Shizan Taji ( talk) 13:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)