 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The plot summary on this page is the same, verbatim, as the IMDB's plot summary for this movie (link at bottom of article). I don't know if this copied that, that copied this, the same guy wrote both, he granted permission, or what. Is this content legit?
- I wrote this a while ago, so IMDB copied Wikipedia. This summary is way too long and to detailed for this article, but this was one of my first edits. I promise everything here is true, so anyone who wants should cut it down to size. I will try to eventually. -- Darnedfrenchman ( talk) 18:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Roger Ebert has quite an interesting and insightful review of this movie here. I will have to leave it to another editor to incorporate relevant parts into the "critical response" section at this time. Nodekeeper ( talk) 18:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The plot summary on this page is the same, verbatim, as the IMDB's plot summary for this movie (link at bottom of article). I don't know if this copied that, that copied this, the same guy wrote both, he granted permission, or what. Is this content legit?
- I wrote this a while ago, so IMDB copied Wikipedia. This summary is way too long and to detailed for this article, but this was one of my first edits. I promise everything here is true, so anyone who wants should cut it down to size. I will try to eventually. -- Darnedfrenchman ( talk) 18:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Roger Ebert has quite an interesting and insightful review of this movie here. I will have to leave it to another editor to incorporate relevant parts into the "critical response" section at this time. Nodekeeper ( talk) 18:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)