This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Organized Labour Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I got a coi wit the subject. I'll be extra careful not to let it show. -- Miss Tercy ( talk) 05:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC) reply

The recent edit by Pfa; here, removes the standard connotation of an initialism, favoring the ambiguity that could ensue when the initialism is next used in the article; standing free. It is common to introduce an intialism when the noun is first spelled out and I am curious as to why the previous editor would disagree. Can you explain this, and perhaps reinstate the former content? Thank you. -- Miss Tercy ( talk) 22:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC) reply