![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
here we go again, someone making publicity for itself on wikipedia GenesisPRO ( talk) 09:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Still have to delete it GenesisPRO ( talk) 10:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
there Brian Leadbetter, a spokesperson for the university, said the investigation into Charlebois has now concluded and no further action will be taken. It has action taken, They accepted resignation GenesisPRO ( talk) 10:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
souces are clear
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/high-profile-dal-business-dean-stepping-down-1.4796909
The announcement comes following an investigation the university began in May into complaints of bullying and harassment against Charlebois. GenesisPRO ( talk) 11:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Sylvain Charlebois has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change
Charlebois holds degrees from the Royal Military College of Canada, the Université de Montréal and the Université de Sherbrooke.[2]
In 2011, he co-founded the University of Guelph's Food Institute, now known as the Arrell Food Institute.[3]
To
Charlebois holds degrees from the Royal Military College of Canada, the Université de Montréal and the Université de Sherbrooke.[2]
Charlebois was at the University of Regina and University of Saskatchewan as its Director of the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy ( https://www.perennia.ca/portfolio-items/dr-sylvain-charlebois/?portfolioCats=616%2C617)
In 2011, he co-founded the University of Guelph's Food Institute, now known as the Arrell Food Institute.[3] Mona merry Blue ( talk) 11:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
We might have to be alert about the possibility that the page is vandalized by pro-Charlebois editors, to make the counterpart look bad. In fact, that was the reason I ended up getting involved in this page with such conviction.
While I don’t have resolute proof, I have strong suspicion that the “ anti-Charlebois vandalism” was a clever strategy from the pro-Charlebois sock puppets to increase the page protection level—immediately after the scandal story had been removed—and make it harder to reinstate the bullying scandal excerpt . In fact, I don’t believe there has ever been anti-Charlebois vandalism at all.
I apologize if I went off boundaries by sharing this theory. But I do want to alert that—given the late failures to enforce a pro-Charlebois page—the next strategy from the sock puppets will be to vandalize the page and make the opposite side look bad.
I will be alert to spot any vandalism against Charlebois, just as I’ll be watching for any pro-Charlebois agenda. It’s likely that the sock puppets won’t accept the status quo Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 05:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I meant to say: The next strategy from the sock puppets *might* be Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 05:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Buttergate was mostly attributed to Julie Van Rosendaal; most of the hate social media messages target her—not Charlebois. Charlebois’ tweet related to Buttergate had only 12 replies.
Yet, I don’t see any vandalism against Julie Van Rosendaal Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 13:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Most read article about buttergate ^. The focus is on Van Roosendal’s investigation, only one mention of Charlebois, giving his opinion. Virtually every news Ericka focuses on Van Roosendal. Unless, of course, the media also has an agenda against Charlebois Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
News press* Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
here we go again, someone making publicity for itself on wikipedia GenesisPRO ( talk) 09:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Still have to delete it GenesisPRO ( talk) 10:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
there Brian Leadbetter, a spokesperson for the university, said the investigation into Charlebois has now concluded and no further action will be taken. It has action taken, They accepted resignation GenesisPRO ( talk) 10:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
souces are clear
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/high-profile-dal-business-dean-stepping-down-1.4796909
The announcement comes following an investigation the university began in May into complaints of bullying and harassment against Charlebois. GenesisPRO ( talk) 11:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Sylvain Charlebois has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change
Charlebois holds degrees from the Royal Military College of Canada, the Université de Montréal and the Université de Sherbrooke.[2]
In 2011, he co-founded the University of Guelph's Food Institute, now known as the Arrell Food Institute.[3]
To
Charlebois holds degrees from the Royal Military College of Canada, the Université de Montréal and the Université de Sherbrooke.[2]
Charlebois was at the University of Regina and University of Saskatchewan as its Director of the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy ( https://www.perennia.ca/portfolio-items/dr-sylvain-charlebois/?portfolioCats=616%2C617)
In 2011, he co-founded the University of Guelph's Food Institute, now known as the Arrell Food Institute.[3] Mona merry Blue ( talk) 11:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
We might have to be alert about the possibility that the page is vandalized by pro-Charlebois editors, to make the counterpart look bad. In fact, that was the reason I ended up getting involved in this page with such conviction.
While I don’t have resolute proof, I have strong suspicion that the “ anti-Charlebois vandalism” was a clever strategy from the pro-Charlebois sock puppets to increase the page protection level—immediately after the scandal story had been removed—and make it harder to reinstate the bullying scandal excerpt . In fact, I don’t believe there has ever been anti-Charlebois vandalism at all.
I apologize if I went off boundaries by sharing this theory. But I do want to alert that—given the late failures to enforce a pro-Charlebois page—the next strategy from the sock puppets will be to vandalize the page and make the opposite side look bad.
I will be alert to spot any vandalism against Charlebois, just as I’ll be watching for any pro-Charlebois agenda. It’s likely that the sock puppets won’t accept the status quo Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 05:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I meant to say: The next strategy from the sock puppets *might* be Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 05:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Buttergate was mostly attributed to Julie Van Rosendaal; most of the hate social media messages target her—not Charlebois. Charlebois’ tweet related to Buttergate had only 12 replies.
Yet, I don’t see any vandalism against Julie Van Rosendaal Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 13:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Most read article about buttergate ^. The focus is on Van Roosendal’s investigation, only one mention of Charlebois, giving his opinion. Virtually every news Ericka focuses on Van Roosendal. Unless, of course, the media also has an agenda against Charlebois Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
News press* Nosfer ariel65 ( talk) 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)