![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 June 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article contains unreliable claims of "confession" extracted under duress prominently. The editor who for some reason wishes to retain this dubious wording has resorted to deleting even the legitimate citations for qualifying the "confession" in the article. I think the deletion of citations by this editor should be examined further. Especially since this article itself is attributing a dubious criminality for an under-trial largely based on a "confession" extracted under duress. WP:CRIME A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person. Scourgeofgod ( talk) 11:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
References
But judges' opinions don't influence what "we" write on Wikipedia.
The "we" are the Wikipedia editors editing according to Wikipedia policies. There is no need to put "reliable source" in quotes, it is fully explained at WP:RS which is the most fundamental policy of Wikipedia. It is never too late to read it. If you find there anything about judges' opinions there, please feel free to quote it.-- Kautilya3 ( talk) 00:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
@ Scourgeofgod: You have reinstated a couple of citations that I moved to the external links section. Can you explain why you did so? How do these sources support the content? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
About this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Swami_Aseemanand&diff=next&oldid=840527823 -- G ( talk) 06:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 June 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article contains unreliable claims of "confession" extracted under duress prominently. The editor who for some reason wishes to retain this dubious wording has resorted to deleting even the legitimate citations for qualifying the "confession" in the article. I think the deletion of citations by this editor should be examined further. Especially since this article itself is attributing a dubious criminality for an under-trial largely based on a "confession" extracted under duress. WP:CRIME A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person. Scourgeofgod ( talk) 11:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
References
But judges' opinions don't influence what "we" write on Wikipedia.
The "we" are the Wikipedia editors editing according to Wikipedia policies. There is no need to put "reliable source" in quotes, it is fully explained at WP:RS which is the most fundamental policy of Wikipedia. It is never too late to read it. If you find there anything about judges' opinions there, please feel free to quote it.-- Kautilya3 ( talk) 00:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
@ Scourgeofgod: You have reinstated a couple of citations that I moved to the external links section. Can you explain why you did so? How do these sources support the content? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
About this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Swami_Aseemanand&diff=next&oldid=840527823 -- G ( talk) 06:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)