![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that this page should be merged with that on the Sussex (passenger ferry) itself. Adresia ( talk) 21:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
the second sentence is internally contradictory.it lists a citation, 'unrestricted submarine warfare', and then describes a restriction, armed merchantmen, but not passenger ships. etwas ist hier los! Toyokuni3 ( talk) 15:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
As clearly stated in one of the links to the article ( http://www.uscsumter.edu/~tpowers/hist112/usentww1.html ), germany wanted something in return for their pledge wich they did not receive. I think this is important and musst be mentioned in the wiki article.
Sorry I didn't move this into a new topic, but I couldn't find the button. So please move. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.165.89 ( talk) 03:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that this page should be merged with that on the Sussex (passenger ferry) itself. Adresia ( talk) 21:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
the second sentence is internally contradictory.it lists a citation, 'unrestricted submarine warfare', and then describes a restriction, armed merchantmen, but not passenger ships. etwas ist hier los! Toyokuni3 ( talk) 15:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
As clearly stated in one of the links to the article ( http://www.uscsumter.edu/~tpowers/hist112/usentww1.html ), germany wanted something in return for their pledge wich they did not receive. I think this is important and musst be mentioned in the wiki article.
Sorry I didn't move this into a new topic, but I couldn't find the button. So please move. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.165.89 ( talk) 03:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)