![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I propose to merge the content of cosmogenic radionuclide dating into this article. There is a lot of duplicated information on these two pages and they currently both discuss the same topic. Potentially surface exposure dating would also include the usage of stable isotopes, but this could be accommodated as a section in the article once someone gets around to writing that section. I feel that the name of this page uses less jargon and is perhaps a more desirable way of referring to this topic. What do you guys think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zploskey ( talk • contribs) 05:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Currently, [1] the entirety of the article's text in in "the lead". Absurd. 74.178.230.234 ( talk) 03:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I propose to merge the content of cosmogenic radionuclide dating into this article. There is a lot of duplicated information on these two pages and they currently both discuss the same topic. Potentially surface exposure dating would also include the usage of stable isotopes, but this could be accommodated as a section in the article once someone gets around to writing that section. I feel that the name of this page uses less jargon and is perhaps a more desirable way of referring to this topic. What do you guys think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zploskey ( talk • contribs) 05:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Currently, [1] the entirety of the article's text in in "the lead". Absurd. 74.178.230.234 ( talk) 03:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)