This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Ugog Nizdast, regarding
this, see
WP:MEDRS. The editor added poor sources; that is why I reverted (as briefly noted on that editor's talk page).
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk) 21:40, 28 October 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm self reverting. But it would be great if you could explain to this editor, exactly how WP:MEDRS is violated and how she can improve on her edit should she choose to do so. I did mention WP:MEDRS to her but lacked the knowledge to judge her edit further since I lack the expertise. To my untrained eye,
the edit has a mix of references which look like journals and some looking like news sites devoted to mental health professionals. I'm guessing it won't be obvious to this new editor too (how the edit is completely not MEDRS-compliant) and you can advise her better. I'll notify her that this discussion is taking place here if you do.
Disclosure: I've participated with this editor in the edit-a-thon.
Ugog Nizdast (
talk) 14:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The edits included
WP:Primary sources, which WP:MEDRS generally discourages the use of. It also included sources that fall under
WP:MEDPOP or the section immediately below WP:MEDPOP. I'll leave a message about this at WP:Med for more commentary.
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk) 16:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Ugog Nizdast, regarding
this, see
WP:MEDRS. The editor added poor sources; that is why I reverted (as briefly noted on that editor's talk page).
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk) 21:40, 28 October 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm self reverting. But it would be great if you could explain to this editor, exactly how WP:MEDRS is violated and how she can improve on her edit should she choose to do so. I did mention WP:MEDRS to her but lacked the knowledge to judge her edit further since I lack the expertise. To my untrained eye,
the edit has a mix of references which look like journals and some looking like news sites devoted to mental health professionals. I'm guessing it won't be obvious to this new editor too (how the edit is completely not MEDRS-compliant) and you can advise her better. I'll notify her that this discussion is taking place here if you do.
Disclosure: I've participated with this editor in the edit-a-thon.
Ugog Nizdast (
talk) 14:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The edits included
WP:Primary sources, which WP:MEDRS generally discourages the use of. It also included sources that fall under
WP:MEDPOP or the section immediately below WP:MEDPOP. I'll leave a message about this at WP:Med for more commentary.
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk) 16:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)reply