This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a bit of nonsense [1]. The title of a page does not need a citation, but if there is a statement here that needs supporting, it is that Superdrug Stores plc trades as Superdrug. That citation does not resolve that issue. The reader is left guessing why a citation is required, and the primary source merely tells them a company called Superdrug Stores plc exists. Which is what the whole page is about. If we need to explain this further, it needs to be explained in the main, and cited there. There is then no need to add a citation in the lead. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 18:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Sirfurboy I only placed it in the lead as seemed an obvious place at the time. I don't mind where it's sourced as long as the information is sourced. I am aware we should generally avoid citations in the lead, so if it is sourced in the main article, that is fine. Strugglehouse ( talk) 22:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply