![]() | Sunda Straits Crisis has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 4, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sunda Straits Crisis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
I'll take this one. Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 18:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I'll say at once that this is an impressively well-written article (with a particularly clear summary in the lead), and few signs of anything that needs fixing, so I expect my comments will be few and simple. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Many thanks. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 07:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
This is an elegantly-constructed article well up to the required standard and I'm happy to pass it as a GA. I wish you the best of luck with it at FAC if that's where you're headed. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Sunda Straits Crisis has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 4, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sunda Straits Crisis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
I'll take this one. Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 18:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I'll say at once that this is an impressively well-written article (with a particularly clear summary in the lead), and few signs of anything that needs fixing, so I expect my comments will be few and simple. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Many thanks. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 07:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
This is an elegantly-constructed article well up to the required standard and I'm happy to pass it as a GA. I wish you the best of luck with it at FAC if that's where you're headed. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)