This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I took out the statement that they don't use interventions with contraindications because that's patently false: CPR is contraindicated in a patient with a heartbeat, for example. I don't think my wording is too good either, however. Maybe someone oughtta write the Do no harm article or word it better. Also, the link to Bivens' article is broken. Delldot 04:09, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
This entry is in the middle of a big edit right now, and I don't know when it will be finished. Please help with dates, verification citations, and information, and remind me of any groups I have left out which should be included.
I reformatted the whole article, including a split of the original article into intro, what they do, and history sections.
I added pre-1999 history.
I am beginning a process of adding short sections on each group, including each group's lifespan and activity span, notable actions it participated in, and other things of note. All content must be verifiable. I am including names in the references section, but nowhere else in the article. This is to protect confidentiality. Feel free to remove your own name or ask me to remove your name if you don't want it in the article at all.
I fixed the broken link in the Bivens article, and added several new articles. I plan to remove the news artilces section as the artilces are incorporated into references.
Two questions:
I want to redirect searched for "Street medics, StreetMedic, StreetMedics, Action Medical, Action-medic, and so on to this page, but I don't know how.
Gobblehook 09:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
formerly of HODOG/VAM! (2001-2003), CUM (2003), TRAM (2003-2005)
currently CGHC (2005-)
I think I am violating the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy by including the unpublished interviews as sources. However, I want this entry to be as complete as possible. I want medics, protesters, and others to actually use it. I also want to put up information on all the important groups since 1968 which are currently preserved only in medic oral history and by packrats like me.
So here's my idea about how to do it. I conduct a series of short, fact-finding interviews with key medics to fill in the missing historical details. I use these details plus a few anecdotes to write a short series on street medic history, that I get published at FreeVoices or Infoshop, or another easy publish.
Then I cite my own articles. It seems to me from reading the pillars and policies that this course of action would be appropriate as long as I adhere to a Neutral POV. Somebody check me on this? Thanks.
Gobblehook 10:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
This article alot of issues and highest among them is it violates wiki's WP:N and WP:V guild lines. Along with those problems it is has a very biased opinion and not holding to WP:NPOV Medicellis ( talk) 14:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Here's the old "Further reading" section that was horribly bloated and preventing this article from getting the expansion it needs. Hopefully we can mine it for sources to use as in-text citations... SchuminWeb ( Talk) 15:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm a street medic active in NW Oregon. Portland Action Medics still use LAW and street medic organizations in the PNW, such as Rosehip based in Portland, still use LAW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C1:8700:1780:7D56:DC97:59B5:F84B ( talk) 06:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I took out the statement that they don't use interventions with contraindications because that's patently false: CPR is contraindicated in a patient with a heartbeat, for example. I don't think my wording is too good either, however. Maybe someone oughtta write the Do no harm article or word it better. Also, the link to Bivens' article is broken. Delldot 04:09, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
This entry is in the middle of a big edit right now, and I don't know when it will be finished. Please help with dates, verification citations, and information, and remind me of any groups I have left out which should be included.
I reformatted the whole article, including a split of the original article into intro, what they do, and history sections.
I added pre-1999 history.
I am beginning a process of adding short sections on each group, including each group's lifespan and activity span, notable actions it participated in, and other things of note. All content must be verifiable. I am including names in the references section, but nowhere else in the article. This is to protect confidentiality. Feel free to remove your own name or ask me to remove your name if you don't want it in the article at all.
I fixed the broken link in the Bivens article, and added several new articles. I plan to remove the news artilces section as the artilces are incorporated into references.
Two questions:
I want to redirect searched for "Street medics, StreetMedic, StreetMedics, Action Medical, Action-medic, and so on to this page, but I don't know how.
Gobblehook 09:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
formerly of HODOG/VAM! (2001-2003), CUM (2003), TRAM (2003-2005)
currently CGHC (2005-)
I think I am violating the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy by including the unpublished interviews as sources. However, I want this entry to be as complete as possible. I want medics, protesters, and others to actually use it. I also want to put up information on all the important groups since 1968 which are currently preserved only in medic oral history and by packrats like me.
So here's my idea about how to do it. I conduct a series of short, fact-finding interviews with key medics to fill in the missing historical details. I use these details plus a few anecdotes to write a short series on street medic history, that I get published at FreeVoices or Infoshop, or another easy publish.
Then I cite my own articles. It seems to me from reading the pillars and policies that this course of action would be appropriate as long as I adhere to a Neutral POV. Somebody check me on this? Thanks.
Gobblehook 10:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
This article alot of issues and highest among them is it violates wiki's WP:N and WP:V guild lines. Along with those problems it is has a very biased opinion and not holding to WP:NPOV Medicellis ( talk) 14:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Here's the old "Further reading" section that was horribly bloated and preventing this article from getting the expansion it needs. Hopefully we can mine it for sources to use as in-text citations... SchuminWeb ( Talk) 15:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm a street medic active in NW Oregon. Portland Action Medics still use LAW and street medic organizations in the PNW, such as Rosehip based in Portland, still use LAW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C1:8700:1780:7D56:DC97:59B5:F84B ( talk) 06:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)