A fact from Storrie Fire appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Storrie Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on
wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
No problem :) Okay! I have placed this article on hold for now and left some comments below. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns otherwise I may not respond. Thanks, ツLunaEatsTuna(
💬)—17:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)reply
@
LunaEatsTuna: I think I've addressed all the comments you left—happy to change anything else should it be necessary! Thanks for the thorough review, I think I agree with pretty much everything.
Penitentes (
talk)
16:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks! Glad to know my comments are valid. Well, I think that is everything; the article looks fantastic! I am now pleased to pass this article for GA status per your changes implemented. Congrats! Also, it is good to see more editors working on fire-related articles :) ツLunaEatsTuna(
💬)—23:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Copyvio check
Earwig Copyvio Detector says everything is good to go.
Files
All images used are relevant, of acceptable quality and copyright-free:
File:2000 Storrie Fire map 1.png: CC-BY-SA 4.0;
File:USA California Northern location map.svg: CC-BY 3.0;
File:More of Roger Puta's Union Pacific Feather River Canyon Shots (27023277160).jpg: valid public domain rationale;
File:2000 Storrie Fire post-fire condition.jpg: valid public domain rationale;
File:2012 Chips Fire before photo 3.jpg: valid public domain rationale.
Prose
The article switches between using U.S. and United States; recommend one variant for consistency.
"and the brunt of the direct attack" – brunt sounds slightly informal; recommend rephrasing (but, ignore me if this is correct in firefighting jargon, in which I am unfamiliar).
"5,000 acres (2,000 ha) (referred to as an 'island') within" – change to "5,000 acres (2,000 ha)—referred to as an 'island'—within" to avoid two parentheses next to one another.
§ Casualties is too short to be its own section IMO.
Done - Agreed, I use that as a sort of template guide while writing and often there's enough content to justify its own subsection. Here not so much.
Penitentes (
talk)
16:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The quotation regarding the Pacific Crest Trial is unnecessary.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. QPQ is done. Hooks are interesting and sourced. I think ALT1 is best.
Thriley (
talk)
22:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Done I checked this out for promotion, Prep 7 has too many US hooks. Prep 1 is the last prep and is full for now, so we will wait for a spot. Good work!
Bruxton (
talk)
18:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)reply
A fact from Storrie Fire appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Storrie Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on
wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
No problem :) Okay! I have placed this article on hold for now and left some comments below. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns otherwise I may not respond. Thanks, ツLunaEatsTuna(
💬)—17:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)reply
@
LunaEatsTuna: I think I've addressed all the comments you left—happy to change anything else should it be necessary! Thanks for the thorough review, I think I agree with pretty much everything.
Penitentes (
talk)
16:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks! Glad to know my comments are valid. Well, I think that is everything; the article looks fantastic! I am now pleased to pass this article for GA status per your changes implemented. Congrats! Also, it is good to see more editors working on fire-related articles :) ツLunaEatsTuna(
💬)—23:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Copyvio check
Earwig Copyvio Detector says everything is good to go.
Files
All images used are relevant, of acceptable quality and copyright-free:
File:2000 Storrie Fire map 1.png: CC-BY-SA 4.0;
File:USA California Northern location map.svg: CC-BY 3.0;
File:More of Roger Puta's Union Pacific Feather River Canyon Shots (27023277160).jpg: valid public domain rationale;
File:2000 Storrie Fire post-fire condition.jpg: valid public domain rationale;
File:2012 Chips Fire before photo 3.jpg: valid public domain rationale.
Prose
The article switches between using U.S. and United States; recommend one variant for consistency.
"and the brunt of the direct attack" – brunt sounds slightly informal; recommend rephrasing (but, ignore me if this is correct in firefighting jargon, in which I am unfamiliar).
"5,000 acres (2,000 ha) (referred to as an 'island') within" – change to "5,000 acres (2,000 ha)—referred to as an 'island'—within" to avoid two parentheses next to one another.
§ Casualties is too short to be its own section IMO.
Done - Agreed, I use that as a sort of template guide while writing and often there's enough content to justify its own subsection. Here not so much.
Penitentes (
talk)
16:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The quotation regarding the Pacific Crest Trial is unnecessary.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. QPQ is done. Hooks are interesting and sourced. I think ALT1 is best.
Thriley (
talk)
22:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Done I checked this out for promotion, Prep 7 has too many US hooks. Prep 1 is the last prep and is full for now, so we will wait for a spot. Good work!
Bruxton (
talk)
18:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)reply