This article was nominated for deletion on 10 April 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 17-02-2018 by Alfie.
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Cleaned it up a bit, but it still needs some work in terms of grammar and stuff. Also needs more content.
-- N3X15 16:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I always thought it was obvious that the monkey was the Evil Monkey from Family Guy. The Evil Monkey lived in Chris Griffin's closet, and was a recurring joke. Seth Green voices Chris Griffin, so I figured he made the monkey his production logo for that reason. Can anybody say exactly what the inspiration is for the Stoop!d Monkey logo? I don't see why we need the Trivia section claiming Curious George may be the inspiration only because he was a "blundering monkey."
The list of logos is indiscriminate trivia. When we can safely describe a group of things, there is no need to describe each memeber of that group in explicit detail. Additionally, it's the sort of trivial thing we can only source to personal observation of the subject, which invariably fails to establish importance. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire | past ops) 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay, you're able to stamp your feet and pout. Got it. Now, do you actually have anything to contribute? -- Calton | Talk 23:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Reality Check #8: This "game", as you falsely characterize it, is the point. You want to add something against consensus and against policy: you have to justify it. Again, shoving your fingers in your ears and shouting "I'M NOT LISTENING" at the top of your lungs doesn't change those cold hard facts. And waiting for the clock to run out on page protection before resuming your edit-warring isn't going to work, either. Start talking or be forever disappointed. -- Calton | Talk 15:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
-- Calton | Talk 08:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
It's someone's wiki, absolutely NOT a reliable source. Reverted. Try again. -- Calton | Talk 22:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Calton....I got nothing for you. Nothing. - SVRTVDude ( Yell | Toil) 03:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
The above mess was to reach a consensus on whether the discriptions of the entity cards of the end of each episode should remain or go. I would like everyone's opinion, so when the 5 day block is up on the page, we might be able to figure out what to do. Hopefully it won't get as out of hand as that mess. - SVRTVDude ( Yell - Toil) 09:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Per Orangemonster2k1's request, here's my view on this:
Therefore, I think the logos should go. Metros232 02:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Filtering out all the hissy fits and uncivil comments above, the substantive arguments about whether to keep the closing logo descriptions seem to boil down to:
For:
Against:
Let me address each argument individually:
I would agree with this. Since these are simple closing logos, I don't see how more than a one line description would be justified anyway, and since there are a limited number of them (42), this page won't get unreasonable burdened with them. (But if one of these closing logos were to generate controversy and become to be the subject of news articles, then it might deserve more...)
I can also agree with this. Some shows have even had episode lists expanded into articles on each episode, but given again that these are still frame logos, there does not seem to be need for a separate article on each one. A simple list of one-line descriptions seems reasonable to me.
The sources cited do appear to confirm the information presented here.
I've seen some of these episodes, and I've seen the closing logo referred to here. Anyone can watch Cartoon Network at the appropriate time and verify the logos, and anyone can obtain the DVD releases to verify them as well.
Now, the arguments against:
WP:TRIVIA defines trivia as "information that is not important to the subject it is being presented in relation to". Sorry, but I am not persuaded by the argument that the content of the Stoopid Monkey logos are not important to the subject of Stoopid Monkey itself. I also don't see anything in WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE that would prohibit this list, unless it is considered a list of "plot summaries". Even then, as long as there is real-world context in the article (which there is in the opening paragraphs), it should be OK.
Well, in this case, the primary source is a published source concerning the subject itself. And everything in Wikipedia is derived from "personal observation" of published sources.
As I addressed above, it can be verified by watching the end of the TV show on Cartoon Network or the DVD.
While the source cited is a wiki, as I argued above the content can be independently verified by anyone in the United States with a TV and a cable or satellite connection or a DVD player, and as such I have no reason to doubt the reliability of this source and don't see any reason it should not be regarded as an exception to the general guideline against using wikis as sources.
Describing the content of a primary published source is not "original research", it is "source-based research", and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia.
The term "fancruft" is usually bandied about by editors who want to remove information they think is "unimportant", regardless of how many people want the information and think it is useful. Keep in mind that this article was created just over one year ago, and had included the list for almost that entire time, while being edited by 23 registered editors and another 19 anonymous IP addresses, which alone provides evidence of a long-standing silent consensus to keep the list in this article.
While I realize the Google test isn't authoritative, the phrase "Stoopid Monkey" gets 3 unique news archive hits and 272 unique web hits. These include T-shirts being sold at Amazon and elsewhere, an IMDB page, and an article about the company's upcoming film. I believe this is enough independent sources to establish notability for the company.
Finally, someone said above that we don't have a "screen shot of every Couch gag on the Simpsons", however, this dispute is not about screenshots, but descriptions. And there is indeed a List of The Simpsons couch gags, including a description of each one.
In summary, the page should remain and should include the list of closing logo descriptions. DHowell 05:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Between the "merge" votes and the "keep but lose the logos" votes, it's pretty clear that the majority view is that they don't belong, regardless of the smoke-blowing by DHowell (among other things, I'll note your misunderstanding of reliable sources and primary sources). Out they go. -- Calton | Talk 17:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Here via RfC. Support inclusion of logos. The use of primary sources is perfectly valid in this case - primary source information is presented absent any interpretation and can be verified by anyone. See this. Also, all participants in this discussion should remember to keep it civil and refrain from making personal comments. Orphic 09:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Here's what I had in mind for the Stoop!d Monkey merge into List of Robot Chicken episodes. (I've removed the fair-use images for this talk page comment, since they aren't being used for critical commentary. Instead, I'm putting in a picture of a flour mill.)
Screenshot | Title | Airdate | Episode # | Production Code |
---|---|---|---|---|
" Junk in the Trunk" | February 20, 2005 | 1 | 2 | |
Rachael Leigh Cook smashes more than eggs in her latest This is Your Brain on Drugs public service announcement. Optimus Prime, leader of the Autobots, falls prey to prostate cancer. The outcome is never in doubt during "World's Most One-Sided Fistfights Caught on Film." Outtakes from The Dukes of Hazzard, The X-Files, Battlestar Galactica and more come to light in " Bloopers." | ||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to hit his tail with a hammer. | ||||
" Nutcracker Sweet" | February 27, 2005 | 2 | 5 | |
Voltron engages in an old-school dance-off in " You Got Robo-Served." The secret lives of nature's most fascinating beasts are exposed in "Secrets of the Animal Kingdom." Testicles are terrorized in "Ode to the Nut Shot." Walt Disney's severed head with its giant robotic spider-body attacks Cuba. | ||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is smoking an entire pack of cigarettes in his mouth. | ||||
" Gold Dust Gasoline" | March 6, 2005 | 3 | 6 | |
The animals Noah left behind try to survive the flood in their very own ark. Enjoy instant nostalgia with " That '00s Show." Mrs. McNally's third-graders produce an animated abomination in "The Best Cowboy." The world's most famous cars, from KITT to the the General Lee and even Mario karts, race against each other in " 3 Fast 3 Furious." | ||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to whack a beehive with a stick. |
That was what I had in mind. That way, we don't have to keep a separate list that runs parallel to the main list of episodes. That was the solution I proposed, and what I still endorse. Other than that, I don't want to get sucked into this rather contentious argument. I'd rather argue about things like Richardsonian Romanesque architecture versus Beaux-Arts architecture. -- Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
[posted to various users' talk pages]
As you are aware, the
Stoop!d Monkey page was the subject of an AfD and the result was, of course, "Keep". Currently, the logos are a point of contention with myself saying that they were part of the "Keep", while
User:Calton saying they were to be dropped and the article was to remain.
I asked the
admin who closed the AfD his opinion and he replied, "I just said the article was to be kept, I don't know about the logos". There wasn't a decision given on the logos and in the AfD only 3 users said the logos should go, only 1 said keep the article, lose the logos.
I am not sure how to handle this, but since the
admin who closed the AfD made no decision and the AfD wasn't about the logos in the first place (and the majority said to keep the logos if you want to be picky about it, as far as I can tell).
This wasn't an issue from April 16th (immediately after the AfD) to May 3rd when
User:Calton realized that I was blocked for 48hours (not related to this) and I couldn't revert his changes.
User:Calton had no interest and made no changes on the page itself or the talk page during that time. So, to me, his initial revert on May 3rd was done because of my block.
I have asked two admins (in case one is offline) to revert his changes and put a block on the page until this can be worked out. I am also asking you, since you contributed to the AfD, what your opinion is on just the logos themselves. I appericate you input one way or the other. Thanks...
SVRTVDude (
V
T) 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Would this work for everyone? The picture on the left being the episode picture and the picture on the right being the stoopid monkey picture, with the tag at the bottom? - SVRTVDude ( V T) 08:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Screenshot | Title | Airdate | Episode # | Production Code | Stoopid Monkey |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
" Junk in the Trunk" | February 20, 2005 | 1 | 2 | ||
Rachael Leigh Cook smashes more than eggs in her latest This is Your Brain on Drugs public service announcement. Optimus Prime, leader of the Autobots, falls prey to prostate cancer. The outcome is never in doubt during "World's Most One-Sided Fistfights Caught on Film." Outtakes from The Dukes of Hazzard, The X-Files, Battlestar Galactica and more come to light in " Bloopers." | |||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to hit his tail with a hammer. |
After talking to some other users, I have moved the explanations of the Stoopid Monkey logos and their respective links and incorporated them into the episode list, which was, of course User:Elkman's idea. So, now we can put this thing to rest. My thanks for everyone's input. - SVRTVDude ( V T) 03:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Are we sure it's Seth Green? It sounds a heck of a lot like Stephen Root to me. thx1138 ( talk) 19:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
The company name incorporates ! as a substitute for an i therefore I think that Stoopid Monkey should be redirected back to Stoop!d Monkey. Opinion? Dancing is Forbidden ( talk) 10:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
In an effort to avoid an edit war I've restrained myself from deleting the paragraph which states "The name "Stoopid Monkey" is a reference to a line from Professor Farnsworth in the Futurama episode "Mars University". Ok so yes Professor Farnsworth does say Stupid Monkey in the episode "Mars University" but I could not find any proof whatsoever that attributes that line being used by Seth Green and Matt Seinreich for the founding of their Stoopid Monkey production company. I did an extensive Google search including "Futurama Stupid Monkey", "Futurama Stoopid Monkey", "Futurama Professor Farnsworth Stupid Monkey", "Futurama Stoopid Monkey" and "Futurama Seth Green Matt Seinreich Stoopid Monkey" with no hits that can provide concrete proof of the origin of the Stoopid Monkey name came from Futurama. Can someone provide actual references to these claims. Thank you. TheGoofyGolfer ( talk) 07:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 20:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Stoopid Monkey →
Stoop!d Monkey – The correct spelling for the production company is Stoop!d Monkey. It is shown on the logo on the entry. The current redirect from Stoop!d Monkey to Stoopid Monkey is backwards.
Timtempleton (
talk) 20:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.Hi there -- Repping Stoopid Buddy Stoodios here and need some help updating this page. In 2011, Stoopid Monkey owners Matt Senreich and Seth Green partnered with John Harvatine IV and Eric Towner of Buddy Systems Studios to merge and found Stoopid Buddy Stoodios. Robot Chicken was produced by Stoopid Monkey until Season 6 in 2011. Any production 2011 or later is produced by Stoopid Buddy Stoodios, NOT Stupid Monkey. Robot Chicken Seasons 1-5: Stoopid Monkey. Seasons 6-present: Stoopid Buddy Stoodios.
There is no page for Stoopid Buddy Stoodios yet. Hoping to edit this page first before creating the new Stoopid Buddy Stoodios page. Can someone help edit this information and remove all credits post 2011?
You can find this information and more specific details on the website, specifically in the founder biography sections. http://www.leagueofbuddies.com/about/the-buddies/founders/john-harvatine-iv/
Any help appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrooker101 ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
If Stoopid Buddy absorbed or merged with Stupid Money, why do both logos appear at the end of new Robot Chicken episodes? Beyond My Ken ( talk) 17:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 April 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 17-02-2018 by Alfie.
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Cleaned it up a bit, but it still needs some work in terms of grammar and stuff. Also needs more content.
-- N3X15 16:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I always thought it was obvious that the monkey was the Evil Monkey from Family Guy. The Evil Monkey lived in Chris Griffin's closet, and was a recurring joke. Seth Green voices Chris Griffin, so I figured he made the monkey his production logo for that reason. Can anybody say exactly what the inspiration is for the Stoop!d Monkey logo? I don't see why we need the Trivia section claiming Curious George may be the inspiration only because he was a "blundering monkey."
The list of logos is indiscriminate trivia. When we can safely describe a group of things, there is no need to describe each memeber of that group in explicit detail. Additionally, it's the sort of trivial thing we can only source to personal observation of the subject, which invariably fails to establish importance. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire | past ops) 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay, you're able to stamp your feet and pout. Got it. Now, do you actually have anything to contribute? -- Calton | Talk 23:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Reality Check #8: This "game", as you falsely characterize it, is the point. You want to add something against consensus and against policy: you have to justify it. Again, shoving your fingers in your ears and shouting "I'M NOT LISTENING" at the top of your lungs doesn't change those cold hard facts. And waiting for the clock to run out on page protection before resuming your edit-warring isn't going to work, either. Start talking or be forever disappointed. -- Calton | Talk 15:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
-- Calton | Talk 08:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
It's someone's wiki, absolutely NOT a reliable source. Reverted. Try again. -- Calton | Talk 22:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Calton....I got nothing for you. Nothing. - SVRTVDude ( Yell | Toil) 03:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
The above mess was to reach a consensus on whether the discriptions of the entity cards of the end of each episode should remain or go. I would like everyone's opinion, so when the 5 day block is up on the page, we might be able to figure out what to do. Hopefully it won't get as out of hand as that mess. - SVRTVDude ( Yell - Toil) 09:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Per Orangemonster2k1's request, here's my view on this:
Therefore, I think the logos should go. Metros232 02:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Filtering out all the hissy fits and uncivil comments above, the substantive arguments about whether to keep the closing logo descriptions seem to boil down to:
For:
Against:
Let me address each argument individually:
I would agree with this. Since these are simple closing logos, I don't see how more than a one line description would be justified anyway, and since there are a limited number of them (42), this page won't get unreasonable burdened with them. (But if one of these closing logos were to generate controversy and become to be the subject of news articles, then it might deserve more...)
I can also agree with this. Some shows have even had episode lists expanded into articles on each episode, but given again that these are still frame logos, there does not seem to be need for a separate article on each one. A simple list of one-line descriptions seems reasonable to me.
The sources cited do appear to confirm the information presented here.
I've seen some of these episodes, and I've seen the closing logo referred to here. Anyone can watch Cartoon Network at the appropriate time and verify the logos, and anyone can obtain the DVD releases to verify them as well.
Now, the arguments against:
WP:TRIVIA defines trivia as "information that is not important to the subject it is being presented in relation to". Sorry, but I am not persuaded by the argument that the content of the Stoopid Monkey logos are not important to the subject of Stoopid Monkey itself. I also don't see anything in WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE that would prohibit this list, unless it is considered a list of "plot summaries". Even then, as long as there is real-world context in the article (which there is in the opening paragraphs), it should be OK.
Well, in this case, the primary source is a published source concerning the subject itself. And everything in Wikipedia is derived from "personal observation" of published sources.
As I addressed above, it can be verified by watching the end of the TV show on Cartoon Network or the DVD.
While the source cited is a wiki, as I argued above the content can be independently verified by anyone in the United States with a TV and a cable or satellite connection or a DVD player, and as such I have no reason to doubt the reliability of this source and don't see any reason it should not be regarded as an exception to the general guideline against using wikis as sources.
Describing the content of a primary published source is not "original research", it is "source-based research", and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia.
The term "fancruft" is usually bandied about by editors who want to remove information they think is "unimportant", regardless of how many people want the information and think it is useful. Keep in mind that this article was created just over one year ago, and had included the list for almost that entire time, while being edited by 23 registered editors and another 19 anonymous IP addresses, which alone provides evidence of a long-standing silent consensus to keep the list in this article.
While I realize the Google test isn't authoritative, the phrase "Stoopid Monkey" gets 3 unique news archive hits and 272 unique web hits. These include T-shirts being sold at Amazon and elsewhere, an IMDB page, and an article about the company's upcoming film. I believe this is enough independent sources to establish notability for the company.
Finally, someone said above that we don't have a "screen shot of every Couch gag on the Simpsons", however, this dispute is not about screenshots, but descriptions. And there is indeed a List of The Simpsons couch gags, including a description of each one.
In summary, the page should remain and should include the list of closing logo descriptions. DHowell 05:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Between the "merge" votes and the "keep but lose the logos" votes, it's pretty clear that the majority view is that they don't belong, regardless of the smoke-blowing by DHowell (among other things, I'll note your misunderstanding of reliable sources and primary sources). Out they go. -- Calton | Talk 17:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Here via RfC. Support inclusion of logos. The use of primary sources is perfectly valid in this case - primary source information is presented absent any interpretation and can be verified by anyone. See this. Also, all participants in this discussion should remember to keep it civil and refrain from making personal comments. Orphic 09:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Here's what I had in mind for the Stoop!d Monkey merge into List of Robot Chicken episodes. (I've removed the fair-use images for this talk page comment, since they aren't being used for critical commentary. Instead, I'm putting in a picture of a flour mill.)
Screenshot | Title | Airdate | Episode # | Production Code |
---|---|---|---|---|
" Junk in the Trunk" | February 20, 2005 | 1 | 2 | |
Rachael Leigh Cook smashes more than eggs in her latest This is Your Brain on Drugs public service announcement. Optimus Prime, leader of the Autobots, falls prey to prostate cancer. The outcome is never in doubt during "World's Most One-Sided Fistfights Caught on Film." Outtakes from The Dukes of Hazzard, The X-Files, Battlestar Galactica and more come to light in " Bloopers." | ||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to hit his tail with a hammer. | ||||
" Nutcracker Sweet" | February 27, 2005 | 2 | 5 | |
Voltron engages in an old-school dance-off in " You Got Robo-Served." The secret lives of nature's most fascinating beasts are exposed in "Secrets of the Animal Kingdom." Testicles are terrorized in "Ode to the Nut Shot." Walt Disney's severed head with its giant robotic spider-body attacks Cuba. | ||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is smoking an entire pack of cigarettes in his mouth. | ||||
" Gold Dust Gasoline" | March 6, 2005 | 3 | 6 | |
The animals Noah left behind try to survive the flood in their very own ark. Enjoy instant nostalgia with " That '00s Show." Mrs. McNally's third-graders produce an animated abomination in "The Best Cowboy." The world's most famous cars, from KITT to the the General Lee and even Mario karts, race against each other in " 3 Fast 3 Furious." | ||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to whack a beehive with a stick. |
That was what I had in mind. That way, we don't have to keep a separate list that runs parallel to the main list of episodes. That was the solution I proposed, and what I still endorse. Other than that, I don't want to get sucked into this rather contentious argument. I'd rather argue about things like Richardsonian Romanesque architecture versus Beaux-Arts architecture. -- Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
[posted to various users' talk pages]
As you are aware, the
Stoop!d Monkey page was the subject of an AfD and the result was, of course, "Keep". Currently, the logos are a point of contention with myself saying that they were part of the "Keep", while
User:Calton saying they were to be dropped and the article was to remain.
I asked the
admin who closed the AfD his opinion and he replied, "I just said the article was to be kept, I don't know about the logos". There wasn't a decision given on the logos and in the AfD only 3 users said the logos should go, only 1 said keep the article, lose the logos.
I am not sure how to handle this, but since the
admin who closed the AfD made no decision and the AfD wasn't about the logos in the first place (and the majority said to keep the logos if you want to be picky about it, as far as I can tell).
This wasn't an issue from April 16th (immediately after the AfD) to May 3rd when
User:Calton realized that I was blocked for 48hours (not related to this) and I couldn't revert his changes.
User:Calton had no interest and made no changes on the page itself or the talk page during that time. So, to me, his initial revert on May 3rd was done because of my block.
I have asked two admins (in case one is offline) to revert his changes and put a block on the page until this can be worked out. I am also asking you, since you contributed to the AfD, what your opinion is on just the logos themselves. I appericate you input one way or the other. Thanks...
SVRTVDude (
V
T) 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Would this work for everyone? The picture on the left being the episode picture and the picture on the right being the stoopid monkey picture, with the tag at the bottom? - SVRTVDude ( V T) 08:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Screenshot | Title | Airdate | Episode # | Production Code | Stoopid Monkey |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
" Junk in the Trunk" | February 20, 2005 | 1 | 2 | ||
Rachael Leigh Cook smashes more than eggs in her latest This is Your Brain on Drugs public service announcement. Optimus Prime, leader of the Autobots, falls prey to prostate cancer. The outcome is never in doubt during "World's Most One-Sided Fistfights Caught on Film." Outtakes from The Dukes of Hazzard, The X-Files, Battlestar Galactica and more come to light in " Bloopers." | |||||
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to hit his tail with a hammer. |
After talking to some other users, I have moved the explanations of the Stoopid Monkey logos and their respective links and incorporated them into the episode list, which was, of course User:Elkman's idea. So, now we can put this thing to rest. My thanks for everyone's input. - SVRTVDude ( V T) 03:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Are we sure it's Seth Green? It sounds a heck of a lot like Stephen Root to me. thx1138 ( talk) 19:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
The company name incorporates ! as a substitute for an i therefore I think that Stoopid Monkey should be redirected back to Stoop!d Monkey. Opinion? Dancing is Forbidden ( talk) 10:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
In an effort to avoid an edit war I've restrained myself from deleting the paragraph which states "The name "Stoopid Monkey" is a reference to a line from Professor Farnsworth in the Futurama episode "Mars University". Ok so yes Professor Farnsworth does say Stupid Monkey in the episode "Mars University" but I could not find any proof whatsoever that attributes that line being used by Seth Green and Matt Seinreich for the founding of their Stoopid Monkey production company. I did an extensive Google search including "Futurama Stupid Monkey", "Futurama Stoopid Monkey", "Futurama Professor Farnsworth Stupid Monkey", "Futurama Stoopid Monkey" and "Futurama Seth Green Matt Seinreich Stoopid Monkey" with no hits that can provide concrete proof of the origin of the Stoopid Monkey name came from Futurama. Can someone provide actual references to these claims. Thank you. TheGoofyGolfer ( talk) 07:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 20:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Stoopid Monkey →
Stoop!d Monkey – The correct spelling for the production company is Stoop!d Monkey. It is shown on the logo on the entry. The current redirect from Stoop!d Monkey to Stoopid Monkey is backwards.
Timtempleton (
talk) 20:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.Hi there -- Repping Stoopid Buddy Stoodios here and need some help updating this page. In 2011, Stoopid Monkey owners Matt Senreich and Seth Green partnered with John Harvatine IV and Eric Towner of Buddy Systems Studios to merge and found Stoopid Buddy Stoodios. Robot Chicken was produced by Stoopid Monkey until Season 6 in 2011. Any production 2011 or later is produced by Stoopid Buddy Stoodios, NOT Stupid Monkey. Robot Chicken Seasons 1-5: Stoopid Monkey. Seasons 6-present: Stoopid Buddy Stoodios.
There is no page for Stoopid Buddy Stoodios yet. Hoping to edit this page first before creating the new Stoopid Buddy Stoodios page. Can someone help edit this information and remove all credits post 2011?
You can find this information and more specific details on the website, specifically in the founder biography sections. http://www.leagueofbuddies.com/about/the-buddies/founders/john-harvatine-iv/
Any help appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrooker101 ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
If Stoopid Buddy absorbed or merged with Stupid Money, why do both logos appear at the end of new Robot Chicken episodes? Beyond My Ken ( talk) 17:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)