StoneToss is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by — Alalch E. at 15:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: American neo-Nazi cartoonist |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
StoneToss article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 120 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 4 May 2024 |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 4 May 2024 |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Current consensus (April 2024):
|
Other talk page banners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
His name is public knowledge and should be posted. 2601:646:8084:B650:BCDE:D8C3:CBAD:E13F ( talk) 02:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Let’s just change the title of the article from “StoneToss” to “Hans Kristian Graebener” now that we know he’s behind StoneToss. Why are we being all Secret Squirrel about literal Nazis? 69.126.152.175 ( talk) 15:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Lol seriously i know he is antisemitic but seriously 86.114.207.170 ( talk) 20:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
But later in the article somebody else (Hart) is quoted as saying that the cartoons rely on "edgy humor". So the scare quotes here are not necessary. We could just say it is edgy humor. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:4CAA:BCDD:9F67:12FA ( talk) 08:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
as"It’s not mild conservatism, it’s exactly the kind of shit we saw in Nazi Germany building up before they started deporting everyone,” CriticalResist8 continues. “To be clear: if you consider yourself right-wing, either centre-right, or classical liberal, or libertarian or whatever, you have to distance yourself from the fascists who purposely try to make themselves look moderately right with edgy humor."
and when making his editorialization the Daily Dot writer made it look that StoneToss said something to the effect of "I use edgy humor", but that is an insertion by the journalist.Still, StoneToss is indeed using "edgy humor", according to Hart. But he did not say something to that effect. His work is critiqued, by the antifa redditor and by Hart as relying on edgy humor to package odious tropes.— Alalch E. 10:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)According to these antifa redditors, the Stonetoss comics are much more sinister than the “edgy humor” their creator says they are.
StoneToss is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by — Alalch E. at 15:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: American neo-Nazi cartoonist |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
StoneToss article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 120 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 4 May 2024 |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 4 May 2024 |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Current consensus (April 2024):
|
Other talk page banners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
His name is public knowledge and should be posted. 2601:646:8084:B650:BCDE:D8C3:CBAD:E13F ( talk) 02:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Let’s just change the title of the article from “StoneToss” to “Hans Kristian Graebener” now that we know he’s behind StoneToss. Why are we being all Secret Squirrel about literal Nazis? 69.126.152.175 ( talk) 15:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Lol seriously i know he is antisemitic but seriously 86.114.207.170 ( talk) 20:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
But later in the article somebody else (Hart) is quoted as saying that the cartoons rely on "edgy humor". So the scare quotes here are not necessary. We could just say it is edgy humor. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:4CAA:BCDD:9F67:12FA ( talk) 08:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
as"It’s not mild conservatism, it’s exactly the kind of shit we saw in Nazi Germany building up before they started deporting everyone,” CriticalResist8 continues. “To be clear: if you consider yourself right-wing, either centre-right, or classical liberal, or libertarian or whatever, you have to distance yourself from the fascists who purposely try to make themselves look moderately right with edgy humor."
and when making his editorialization the Daily Dot writer made it look that StoneToss said something to the effect of "I use edgy humor", but that is an insertion by the journalist.Still, StoneToss is indeed using "edgy humor", according to Hart. But he did not say something to that effect. His work is critiqued, by the antifa redditor and by Hart as relying on edgy humor to package odious tropes.— Alalch E. 10:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)According to these antifa redditors, the Stonetoss comics are much more sinister than the “edgy humor” their creator says they are.