![]() | Steve Zakuani has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Given the events of this weekend, I naturally pulled up this article to read about the player and was pleasantly surprised to find a decent article with good coverage references. I'm going to put some effort into improving the article (cleaning up refs, expanding the lead, and adding any other points that may be missing) and get it to GA status. I'm doing this for two reasons: (1) to get to know more about this great player and human being, and (2) to pay a small tribute to him on Wikipedia. Get well Steve. #forSteve -- SkotyWA T C 16:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Striking the stats references issue since I see Cptnono followed up on it. Great work! -- SkotyWA T C 05:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I am against these sections being updated on a weekly basis since editors tend to not add sources. I appreciate the effort and it is close to correct but since it is not correct (just the other day I found a major inconsistency) we need to stop it from happening unless editors actually provide a verifying link. So here are the links needed to make the table. Yes, we will need to remove parameters since they are not verifiable but I am sick of seeing it not kept up properly:
Cptnono ( talk) 03:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | 1a. Some minor issues which I'll fix myself. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | 1b. No major issues, but see suggestions. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | 2a. No issues found. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | 2b. Several major issues, including dead links. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | 2c. A couple of unsupported claims. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | 3a. No issues found, but see suggestions. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | 3b. No issues found. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | 4. No issues found. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | 5. No issues found. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | 6a. No issues found. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | 6b. No issues found. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Reviewer: GW (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Consensus up above was to go with American English (although it may need a quick double check). I reverted this. I don;t really mind switching it to British English if someone want to do the whole article. This would go against consensus formed above so if someone does decide to do it I hope that they consider if it is really worth the effort. Cptnono ( talk) 17:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Steve Zakuani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Steve Zakuani has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Given the events of this weekend, I naturally pulled up this article to read about the player and was pleasantly surprised to find a decent article with good coverage references. I'm going to put some effort into improving the article (cleaning up refs, expanding the lead, and adding any other points that may be missing) and get it to GA status. I'm doing this for two reasons: (1) to get to know more about this great player and human being, and (2) to pay a small tribute to him on Wikipedia. Get well Steve. #forSteve -- SkotyWA T C 16:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Striking the stats references issue since I see Cptnono followed up on it. Great work! -- SkotyWA T C 05:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I am against these sections being updated on a weekly basis since editors tend to not add sources. I appreciate the effort and it is close to correct but since it is not correct (just the other day I found a major inconsistency) we need to stop it from happening unless editors actually provide a verifying link. So here are the links needed to make the table. Yes, we will need to remove parameters since they are not verifiable but I am sick of seeing it not kept up properly:
Cptnono ( talk) 03:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | 1a. Some minor issues which I'll fix myself. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | 1b. No major issues, but see suggestions. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | 2a. No issues found. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | 2b. Several major issues, including dead links. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | 2c. A couple of unsupported claims. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | 3a. No issues found, but see suggestions. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | 3b. No issues found. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | 4. No issues found. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | 5. No issues found. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | 6a. No issues found. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | 6b. No issues found. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Reviewer: GW (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Consensus up above was to go with American English (although it may need a quick double check). I reverted this. I don;t really mind switching it to British English if someone want to do the whole article. This would go against consensus formed above so if someone does decide to do it I hope that they consider if it is really worth the effort. Cptnono ( talk) 17:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Steve Zakuani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)