This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please, do not put "allegedly" to something that's proven and obvious - Kotroman couldn't've been anything else from a Roman Catholic Christian. -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
...provide a valuable reason why the Bosniak history category belongs here? -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant: WP:PA. Additionally, you have completly misunderstood the policty Wikipedia:Vandalism and its factual meaning as statet in that edit summary of yours. -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Regardless of what Stephen I's ethnicity was (and bearing in mind that ethnicity then is really not the same concept as it is now), would it be fair to say that his actions affected both Serb and Bosniak regions?
And thus, we can include this article in both "Bosniak history" and "Serb history". And the only reason "Bosniak" comes before "Serb" is because of alphabetical order.
I know this won't settle everything, but I'd like to think that it will help a little bit. DS 21:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
To Emir Arven:
Could you please stop spreading nationalistic propaganda against me, the Serbs and "all your enemies"? You remind me of Vojislav Seselj who calls everyone standing in front of his way "Ustasas". Also, please stop spreading false accusations. -- HolyRomanEmperor 15:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
To HolyRomanEmperor:
I just wrote what you told us all here. And you told us that in Vladimir Corovic book is a source for you thesis that Stjepan was a Serb Orthodox?! That was false, I checked it, and everyone can check it for him/herself. So my dear friend, that was not spreading propaganda against you, that was just a simple truth.-- Emir Arven 20:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes you did. Here is your lie my dear friend. Nothing can be hidden. [2] As you can see the source was (Istorija srpskog naroda/History of Serb people, by Vladimir Ćorović), and HRE was so self-confident that he said: this is a proof that you don't even care one bit about this article; if you did, you would've read it and noticed the source;. So I checked it and found that you lied in order to prove Stjepan's mother wishes?!. -- Emir Arven 23:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
That's exactly what I was saying - I was sourcing nearly half of the article, and reacted to your removal of the valid source. On the other hand, you responded with "Serb nationalist vladimir Corovic... that book is crap". And indeed I was right - the only thing that mattered to you is the ethnicity of the writer - not its contents. However, this should be discussed elswhere - as it's not the subject. -- HolyRomanEmperor 12:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
WAs not Stjepan or Stefan. His name was Stipan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.252.238.12 ( talk) 18:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please, do not put "allegedly" to something that's proven and obvious - Kotroman couldn't've been anything else from a Roman Catholic Christian. -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
...provide a valuable reason why the Bosniak history category belongs here? -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant: WP:PA. Additionally, you have completly misunderstood the policty Wikipedia:Vandalism and its factual meaning as statet in that edit summary of yours. -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Regardless of what Stephen I's ethnicity was (and bearing in mind that ethnicity then is really not the same concept as it is now), would it be fair to say that his actions affected both Serb and Bosniak regions?
And thus, we can include this article in both "Bosniak history" and "Serb history". And the only reason "Bosniak" comes before "Serb" is because of alphabetical order.
I know this won't settle everything, but I'd like to think that it will help a little bit. DS 21:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
To Emir Arven:
Could you please stop spreading nationalistic propaganda against me, the Serbs and "all your enemies"? You remind me of Vojislav Seselj who calls everyone standing in front of his way "Ustasas". Also, please stop spreading false accusations. -- HolyRomanEmperor 15:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
To HolyRomanEmperor:
I just wrote what you told us all here. And you told us that in Vladimir Corovic book is a source for you thesis that Stjepan was a Serb Orthodox?! That was false, I checked it, and everyone can check it for him/herself. So my dear friend, that was not spreading propaganda against you, that was just a simple truth.-- Emir Arven 20:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes you did. Here is your lie my dear friend. Nothing can be hidden. [2] As you can see the source was (Istorija srpskog naroda/History of Serb people, by Vladimir Ćorović), and HRE was so self-confident that he said: this is a proof that you don't even care one bit about this article; if you did, you would've read it and noticed the source;. So I checked it and found that you lied in order to prove Stjepan's mother wishes?!. -- Emir Arven 23:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
That's exactly what I was saying - I was sourcing nearly half of the article, and reacted to your removal of the valid source. On the other hand, you responded with "Serb nationalist vladimir Corovic... that book is crap". And indeed I was right - the only thing that mattered to you is the ethnicity of the writer - not its contents. However, this should be discussed elswhere - as it's not the subject. -- HolyRomanEmperor 12:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
WAs not Stjepan or Stefan. His name was Stipan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.252.238.12 ( talk) 18:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)