This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the reasons see Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Comics#Help with Star Brand/Green lantern comparison.
As you can see there I was advised that it should go due to it violating Wikipedia policy on original research.
I'm sorry if I offended anyone. I though that since I created that section and more than 90% of what is written was written by me that my deleting it was no big deal. For all the reasons stated on the WikiProject Comics page, I do feal it has to go. ( Stephen Day 00:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC))
...which of the three is the actual focus of the page? The comic box suggests it's about the New Universe title, but the rest of the article doesn't quite reflect that. When newuniversal sees print, assuming that it's successful, this is going to get even more convoluted... is there an easy way to sort it out? -- Mrph 22:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I moved the following here from the article. I don't know anything about this subject, so someone else will have to deal with it:
ike9898 15:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have the complete Starbrand collection. Starbrand issue #19 page #17. Star Child had sent Jacob to get The Old Man. The Old Man resists and their battle destroys Jim's jet. Jim lands barely alive. Jacob uses the Star Brand's power to save Jim. Page 27, at the end of the comic, Jim is shown with the Star Brand on his hand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phamti ( talk • contribs) 00:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
" Technohol 13 - A comprehensive look at the Star Brand and New Universe characters and powers for gaming purposes. I propose this Wiki bring over some material from here." - I snipped out the last sentence for obvious stylistic reasons, although I don't think the linked material is really very encyclopaedic in any case. --Grey Knight 02:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Quasar49 starbrand.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 09:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
So the re-imagined Kenneth Connell of the newuniverse has his own article now, so I propose that his section be removed but leave a link to his character. McBeardy ( talk) 14:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
This image is of a comic book and the copyright is owned by
Marvel Comics, the person who commissioned the work, or the heirs thereof. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of works of art
qualifies as
fair use under
United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be
copyright infringement. See
Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. |
I've now had to move the infobox back to where it is more than a few times now. Until now I've just let people know on their own talk pages. Its happened so often enough now that I guess I should state something here.
The infobox is where it is because of a problem that kept occuring when it was located at the top of the article. Some editors would see the infobox and just assume that the article was about that particular series without reding the rest of the article to discover that it covers more than just that. The opening kept getting edited to reflect this mistake. After having to deal with this way to many times, I moved the infobox into the section dealing with the original series.
Please don't move the infobox back to the top of the article. Its fine where it is and its location avoids the problem I just mentioned. Stephen Day ( talk) 20:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Is uncited. Also, probably does not belong in this article, but rather in the one about the newuniversal Star Brand. 96.60.70.254 ( talk) 17:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
(Shooter had modeled many aspects of the Connell character on himself.)
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the reasons see Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Comics#Help with Star Brand/Green lantern comparison.
As you can see there I was advised that it should go due to it violating Wikipedia policy on original research.
I'm sorry if I offended anyone. I though that since I created that section and more than 90% of what is written was written by me that my deleting it was no big deal. For all the reasons stated on the WikiProject Comics page, I do feal it has to go. ( Stephen Day 00:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC))
...which of the three is the actual focus of the page? The comic box suggests it's about the New Universe title, but the rest of the article doesn't quite reflect that. When newuniversal sees print, assuming that it's successful, this is going to get even more convoluted... is there an easy way to sort it out? -- Mrph 22:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I moved the following here from the article. I don't know anything about this subject, so someone else will have to deal with it:
ike9898 15:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have the complete Starbrand collection. Starbrand issue #19 page #17. Star Child had sent Jacob to get The Old Man. The Old Man resists and their battle destroys Jim's jet. Jim lands barely alive. Jacob uses the Star Brand's power to save Jim. Page 27, at the end of the comic, Jim is shown with the Star Brand on his hand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phamti ( talk • contribs) 00:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
" Technohol 13 - A comprehensive look at the Star Brand and New Universe characters and powers for gaming purposes. I propose this Wiki bring over some material from here." - I snipped out the last sentence for obvious stylistic reasons, although I don't think the linked material is really very encyclopaedic in any case. --Grey Knight 02:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Quasar49 starbrand.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 09:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
So the re-imagined Kenneth Connell of the newuniverse has his own article now, so I propose that his section be removed but leave a link to his character. McBeardy ( talk) 14:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
This image is of a comic book and the copyright is owned by
Marvel Comics, the person who commissioned the work, or the heirs thereof. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of works of art
qualifies as
fair use under
United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be
copyright infringement. See
Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. |
I've now had to move the infobox back to where it is more than a few times now. Until now I've just let people know on their own talk pages. Its happened so often enough now that I guess I should state something here.
The infobox is where it is because of a problem that kept occuring when it was located at the top of the article. Some editors would see the infobox and just assume that the article was about that particular series without reding the rest of the article to discover that it covers more than just that. The opening kept getting edited to reflect this mistake. After having to deal with this way to many times, I moved the infobox into the section dealing with the original series.
Please don't move the infobox back to the top of the article. Its fine where it is and its location avoids the problem I just mentioned. Stephen Day ( talk) 20:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Is uncited. Also, probably does not belong in this article, but rather in the one about the newuniversal Star Brand. 96.60.70.254 ( talk) 17:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
(Shooter had modeled many aspects of the Connell character on himself.)