This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
– I do not see how an under-referenced article on an actor with a career of bit parts and small roles can be the primary topic over the various other people having the same name. The artist seems to have greater historical significance, and another subject is now the Chief Judge of a United States district court.
bd2412T19:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Hard to object to him being the primary topic when the other pages are frequently never viewed. Between
Stanley Anderson,
Stanley Anderson (artist) and
Stanley Thomas Anderson, the actor received
93% of the pageviews this year. (It's 92% if you exclude the brief spike he got from his death.) Even if you add the PTM Stan Andersons (which adds 2 death spikes), the actor is still the overwhelming favorite with
70%, 75% if you ignore the deaths. So when there is only one topic readers care about at all, there is no reason for
Stanley Anderson to point to a DAB page.
Nohomersryan (
talk)
22:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Neutral - Going back
several months of page views, the actor gets about 80% of pageviews compared to the others (apart from the months after his death). While this is a high proportion, I anticipate that in the long-term (
WP:10 year test) we will see that spread diminish and that there is no credible long-term primary topic. We can either address it now, or later. --
Netoholic@04:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Support per nomination. Every disambiguation page has entries that receive more views than other entries. Not every disambiguation page, however, has a primary topic and certain standards and burdens should be met in order to become primary. An actor whose entire career seems to have consisted of relatively minor roles does not appear to qualify.
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)08:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
– I do not see how an under-referenced article on an actor with a career of bit parts and small roles can be the primary topic over the various other people having the same name. The artist seems to have greater historical significance, and another subject is now the Chief Judge of a United States district court.
bd2412T19:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Hard to object to him being the primary topic when the other pages are frequently never viewed. Between
Stanley Anderson,
Stanley Anderson (artist) and
Stanley Thomas Anderson, the actor received
93% of the pageviews this year. (It's 92% if you exclude the brief spike he got from his death.) Even if you add the PTM Stan Andersons (which adds 2 death spikes), the actor is still the overwhelming favorite with
70%, 75% if you ignore the deaths. So when there is only one topic readers care about at all, there is no reason for
Stanley Anderson to point to a DAB page.
Nohomersryan (
talk)
22:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Neutral - Going back
several months of page views, the actor gets about 80% of pageviews compared to the others (apart from the months after his death). While this is a high proportion, I anticipate that in the long-term (
WP:10 year test) we will see that spread diminish and that there is no credible long-term primary topic. We can either address it now, or later. --
Netoholic@04:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Support per nomination. Every disambiguation page has entries that receive more views than other entries. Not every disambiguation page, however, has a primary topic and certain standards and burdens should be met in order to become primary. An actor whose entire career seems to have consisted of relatively minor roles does not appear to qualify.
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)08:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.