This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone verify the 1879 birth date? The pl wp says he was born in 1880. Appleseed ( Talk) 21:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I think a paper in the library of Congress has the right info, go see it
SAH-DennyCrane
06:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
The rematch with Gama is first listed at 42 sec.-then 40. Which is correct? Mk5384 ( talk) 01:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
This article reads more like someone trying to tell a story than write an encyclopedic article to me. Take the following passage.
Is there really any reason not to write it more like "Gama and Zbyszko had a much anticipate{{cn}} match in 1928, in which Gama threw Zybszko in 42 seconds to win?"?
There's tons of other similar written-too-flowery sentences and passages in the article. 184.14.203.25 ( talk) 02:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone verify the 1879 birth date? The pl wp says he was born in 1880. Appleseed ( Talk) 21:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I think a paper in the library of Congress has the right info, go see it
SAH-DennyCrane
06:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
The rematch with Gama is first listed at 42 sec.-then 40. Which is correct? Mk5384 ( talk) 01:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
This article reads more like someone trying to tell a story than write an encyclopedic article to me. Take the following passage.
Is there really any reason not to write it more like "Gama and Zbyszko had a much anticipate{{cn}} match in 1928, in which Gama threw Zybszko in 42 seconds to win?"?
There's tons of other similar written-too-flowery sentences and passages in the article. 184.14.203.25 ( talk) 02:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)