![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I guess I am going to have to take this thorugh AFD, but I should't have to, as the rules on DAB pages are clear on this. DAB pages are only to list actual articles. SInce there is only one article about this title, no DAB page is needed. While it can be debated which historicla district is the primary topic, a simple hatnote on the TN page is suffient to direct people to the other page. The MOS also states that a DAB page is probably not needed for only 2 articles. - BillCJ ( talk) 07:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
The bottom line is, we don't need a DAB page for two articles; since one has a differnt name, this name is open for the other one. A hatnote is sufficient, and it always was. I'll take this to AFD, and see what happens. If the page is deleted, then the project tag issue is moot. I won't remove it again, but I still believe you're wrong here per the relevant MOSes, which I won't look up for you either. - BillCJ ( talk) 18:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I guess I am going to have to take this thorugh AFD, but I should't have to, as the rules on DAB pages are clear on this. DAB pages are only to list actual articles. SInce there is only one article about this title, no DAB page is needed. While it can be debated which historicla district is the primary topic, a simple hatnote on the TN page is suffient to direct people to the other page. The MOS also states that a DAB page is probably not needed for only 2 articles. - BillCJ ( talk) 07:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
The bottom line is, we don't need a DAB page for two articles; since one has a differnt name, this name is open for the other one. A hatnote is sufficient, and it always was. I'll take this to AFD, and see what happens. If the page is deleted, then the project tag issue is moot. I won't remove it again, but I still believe you're wrong here per the relevant MOSes, which I won't look up for you either. - BillCJ ( talk) 18:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)