Srebrenica is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
@
OyMosby: I've removed the part about the state of economy during communist Yu, it was unsourced. Everything else is sourced and factually correct. Do expand and make other tweaks if you have the time. Sadkσ(talk is cheap)17:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Sadko: I didn’t see any citations for the other parts too that why I removed your new additions. I agree that the section should be expanded but we need to cite the claims. Even if we think it’s obvious or common sense or personally know as a fact. Lets try to track down some RS for this. I will look into this and help. I am busy in RL at the moment so can pop in randomly. Thanks.
OyMosby (
talk)
17:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
I couldn’t track this down in the article? Unless I missed it? Its about listing all the various entities that controlled Sebrenica at different times. We need a source confirming. I was trying to fund in the body where the new intro content was based on but could see anything. So from that a citation would be good after that content is stated I figured.
OyMosby (
talk)
18:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Okay. It seems that several new references have been introduced. I've added 1 or 2 references before as well. The article is, sadly, in a poor shape. I searched a bit about economy of the town, but there are little reliable sources available online. Do you have a version of the lead which you would consider to be an improvement? Sadkσ(talk is cheap)21:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Just as long as everything can be traced to RS citations. I will get back on a version when I can find sources and ......... time. Things have gotten very busy in life lately. Cheers
OyMosby (
talk)
22:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Srebrenica is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
@
OyMosby: I've removed the part about the state of economy during communist Yu, it was unsourced. Everything else is sourced and factually correct. Do expand and make other tweaks if you have the time. Sadkσ(talk is cheap)17:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Sadko: I didn’t see any citations for the other parts too that why I removed your new additions. I agree that the section should be expanded but we need to cite the claims. Even if we think it’s obvious or common sense or personally know as a fact. Lets try to track down some RS for this. I will look into this and help. I am busy in RL at the moment so can pop in randomly. Thanks.
OyMosby (
talk)
17:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
I couldn’t track this down in the article? Unless I missed it? Its about listing all the various entities that controlled Sebrenica at different times. We need a source confirming. I was trying to fund in the body where the new intro content was based on but could see anything. So from that a citation would be good after that content is stated I figured.
OyMosby (
talk)
18:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Okay. It seems that several new references have been introduced. I've added 1 or 2 references before as well. The article is, sadly, in a poor shape. I searched a bit about economy of the town, but there are little reliable sources available online. Do you have a version of the lead which you would consider to be an improvement? Sadkσ(talk is cheap)21:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Just as long as everything can be traced to RS citations. I will get back on a version when I can find sources and ......... time. Things have gotten very busy in life lately. Cheers
OyMosby (
talk)
22:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)reply