Squid has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 30, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Squid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Squid appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 February 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Izzy8484.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 10:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
okay with just mentioning Sepiolida and other squid orders in the second paragraph, but should we also try to include them in the taxobox somehow? It's a messy issue at this point. -- Chinasaur 17:10, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Yeah, you're right. It's good. -- Chinasaur
So this article says In American fish markets and restaurants, it is usually known by the Greek plural calamari. But Wiktionary:Calamari#Etymology says It. calamari also Fr. calmar, Int. calamar Which one is right? - Cjensen 23:38, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I didn't see any reference to the mantle in this article. I've added the word in the sentence "Like all cephalopods, squids are distinguished", but there may be a better place to mention it. Mantle (mollusc) does a good job of describing it, but has nothing specific to squids. - joe 19:05, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
The article states that male cuttlefish pretend to be female by hiding one pair of arms as females have 3 pairs. Surely all cuttlefish have 8 arms thus 4 pairs. Either editing or correction is needed
i need the physical discribtion of the squid. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkavuru ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
If we're going to mention that they're "popular as food" in the first line of the article, ought we add a note about the popularity of tentacle porn? Njál 01:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Its certainly not popular in English cuisine and there are no known English squid dishes. Tastes great but only usual eaten in England in Italian, Spanish, Chinese dishes etc. Will edit main text. JDN
please make more info om the squid. i'm making a 5-page essay on it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.200.116.131 ( talk • contribs) .
A mention of average lifespan should be added, I don't know anything about squids so I can't. -- Plankton5005 06:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Squid is also used as slang for an underclassman, more specifically a freshman in highshool. Also used as a slang for a person that knowingly breaks the law, litters and shows disrespect for others. Squids in this respect think only about what is best for them and not what effect they have on other people or groups of people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.80.160.16 ( talk) 18:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC).
One of the questions a Physics assignment I saw recently asked how squids are able to navigate below the "crush pressure". Personally I'd never heard of such a thing, but in case someone here knows it's another tidbit which could be added. I'll look on Google to see if I can find some answers. -- Oreckel 01:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
wht do s2quids eat —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.14.255.81 ( talk) 22:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC).
Can squids live in saltwater? (I'm asuming they can, but the article doesn't mention, so I thought I'd ask. It's for a project.) JimmmyThePiep 08:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Squids Live In Dens Right? I Dont Remember... -Alyssa
The only place the cuttlebone is mentioned is in passing in the Squid as food section. I definately think the cuttlebone deserves mention (or at least a link) in the anatomy of the squid, as it is one of the more notable structures a squid has. And don't ask me to write it, because I'm definately no expert.-- Vlmastra 20:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Is squid cooked in its own ink a real dish, or fiction? It sounds, um, somewhat less than delicious. Chris 06:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Aren't we getting a little off course J.H.McDonnell ( talk) 14:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
I removed some of the images in the classification to prevent image stacking, something that is expressly discouraged by WP:IMAGES and WP:IUP. I also added what is a Wikimedia Commons Featured Picture as the cuisine image. VanTucky (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Several of the external links at the bottom of the page do not work (Squidcam--I was disappointed--and the Scientific American Article). If several weeks go by from the time of this post and they are still inoperable we might want to remove them. 67.88.117.162 07:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Can someone edit the offensive material in this article?: The mouth of the squid is equipped with a sharp horny dick that feels amazing in ur butt mainly made of chitin [1] and cross-linked ... 65.209.244.4 20:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
What do squid eat? What role do they serve in the ocean ecology (other than as food for whales). How are they affected by global warming? What ocean environments are best/least suited for squid? -- ☑ SamuelWantman 03:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I have a zoology textbook that says the giant squid (Architeuthis) is ~60ft in length. What should we do about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.136.212 ( talk) 16:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Also, There is this recent review on the Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni that is more relevant than the current link [1]
References
On the February 8, 2009, episode of American Dad, a key plot point had Francine Smith get an article published in "Ocean Digest" magazine, ostensibly about the Colossal squid. In fact, the left page of the magazine had this chunk of text from Wikipedia's Squid article ("Squid have differentiated from their ancestral molluscs in such a way that the body plan has been condensed antero-posteriorly and extended dorso-ventrally. What before may have been the foot of the ancestor is now modified into a complex set of tentacles and highly developed sense organs, including advanced eyes similar to those of vertebrates. The shell of the ancestor has been lost, with only an internal gladius, or pen, remaining.") and the right page had a passage from the Giant squid article. - Dravecky ( talk) 01:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
How intelligent are squid? How do they communicate. It might sound funny, but a CBS new clip on Giant Squid showed one being reeled in and it sounded like the squid was making a squeek. When I took a fish farming class we were told that lobsters yell when dropped into boiling water, so what is with this? What kind of brain do they have, how big is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.17.39 ( talk) 02:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Italic text
I simplified the classification in the text to include just those groups referred to as squid, which is no more than a familiar term for a marine animal with 10 arms projecting from its head. Other coleoids can be linked from that page or from the Cephalopod article. If anyone really thinks that superfluous redundancy makes for a better article, go a head and revert. Regards J.H.McDonnell ( talk) 14:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Chtenopteryx sicula2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
A story in the news about a woman who ate squid and got a surprise.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 12:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Is this particular detail really relevant?
According to the WoRMS [1] Teuthida is a nomen dubium (includes [Myopsida + Oegopsida] which are not demonstrated to form a clade). So Myopsida [2] and Oegopsida [3] are no longer suborders but orders. Any comment? DenesFeri ( talk) 11:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I always thought squids had six legs. Is the first paragraph in error? I would attempt to correct the apparent error, but the article is protected. So I am asking if it is an error. 68.100.116.118 ( talk) 01:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
According to the Wikipedia article about Decapodiformes, squids and cuttlefish has ten arms. This article claims the number of arms is eight. This claim should be corrected in one of the articles. The name Decapodiformes suggests ten arms. !-- End request --> 81.191.82.225 ( talk) 18:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Squid. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
The link under "evolution" to the article for "foot" gives the article for the human foot, not mollusk foot, which is this link. /info/en/?search=Mollusca#Foot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levhatorah ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 ( talk · contribs) 19:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Currently Squid is in an unusual situiation of having an {{ infobox}} instead of and {{ Automatic taxobox}} or {{ Paraphyletic group}}. The included {{ taxonbar}} indicates the taxon should be Teuthida, which is a redirect to the Squid page. The taxon is accepted from what I can see. If it is monophyletic then an {{ Automatic taxobox}} should be added. If it is paraphyletic or polyphyletic then {{ Paraphyletic group}} should be used. If for some reason the Squid article would like to divorce itself from the Teuthida concept, then that page should be created. Honestly though, I think it could be easily fixed with an {{ Automatic taxobox}} and then stating that vampire squid are not true squid and that cuttlefish are. -- Nessie ( talk) 18:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
|from=Q81900
in the {{
taxonbar}} go to, then?* Keep separate. Merging would be an easy solution, but not the correct one. Yes, Decapodiformes is a pretty short article, but it is the parent taxa of squids and not equivalent to it. Particularly the extinct order Boletzkyida and the clade Belemnoidea are "not" squids. Squid-like, squid ancestors maybe, but not squids. Likewise, the taxobox for squid should not equate squids with the superorder Decapodiformes as it does presently.
Loopy30 (
talk)
01:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)
These articles are not very clear and quite confusing for a layperson who wants to look up the internal systematics of the Cephalopoda.
If it is still unclear, that and the current consensus should be mentioned everywhere.
I assume that until recently, only Teuthida were commonly called "squids" and were found to be paraphyletic because they probably contain the cuttlefish?
Teuthida redirects to this article, yet it isn't mentioned other than being an order that is part of Decapodiformes (in the infobox to the right) with the remark nomen dubium. What were and happened to Teuthida? In this talk page above, it is proposed that this should be mentioned in a stub page. Either that, or it should be mentioned in
Decapodiformes, instead of simply linking to itself.
In my opinion, this is relevant, because information regarding Teutida, although obsolete, is still commonly found outside of the English Wikipedia.
Cephalopod#Taxonomy also seperates cuttlefish from squid, it also mentions Teuthida which links to this article. If the information in the article decapodiformes is correct, than the taxonomy in the article Cephalopoda is simply outdated and wrong, isn't it? The phylogenetic tree on that article (
Cephalopod#Phylogeny) includes sepiida in decapodiformes, although it mentions "The attachment of the clade including Sepia and Spirula is unclear; either of the points marked with an asterisk may represent the root of this clade." (whatever exactly that means... how could that clade possibly include itself? In the first place, why are there genera like Sepia and not the order Sepiida shown?)
The
sepiida article as well clearly seperates cuttlefish from squid and implies in the very first sentence that "squid" are an order, yet that word links to "Decapodiforma" which is a superorder that seems to include cuttlefish. If it is true that cuttlefish are now in the superorder of squid, even if they have their anatomical specialities, it just should be mentioned there.
I have trouble understanding this sentence in
Squid#Taxonomy_and_phylogeny: "Orders are shown in boldface; all the families not included in those orders, except Sepiadariidae and Sepiidae are in the paraphyletic order "Sepiida", are in the paraphyletic order "Oegopsida". Everything after the first comma doesn't grammatically make sense to me.
-- 2003:F6:2717:1400:BDF6:C51C:B722:51E8 ( talk) 20:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change of grammar and spelling RPG2428 ( talk) 23:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
In the Schmitt trigger diagram I assume the signal U isn't an example from an squid's axon - just a arbitrary example of a varying analogue signal. I propose making the wording more clearly reflect this. Jonpatterns ( talk) 14:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the section on sensory parts, I notice that 3 cm is not 1 inch. Search for " 3 cm (1 in)" I don't know which length is correct, I'm afraid. 2A01:4C8:801:FB34:3D09:D99:9185:EE1A ( talk) 12:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Squids are a type of decapodiform, but that doesn’t mean they’re synonymous. Cuttlefish are decapodiformes, but they are not squids. There should be a separate page for decapodiformes. Am spooky ocapus ( talk) 22:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change ‘An inhalant siphon behind the funnel draws water into the mantel cavity via a valve.’
To ‘An inhalant siphon behind the funnel draws water into the mantle cavity via a valve.’
mantle is mis-spelled 213.165.186.61 ( talk) 12:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
1. bottletail/pyjama squids are shown to be distantly related to cuttlefishes, when they are a family of sepiida
2. the pygmy squids are a family within the order sepiolida (not to be confused with sepiida, the cuttlefishes), and not a seperate order.
3. Oegopsida is split into many families and subfamilies while Myopsida and Spiruila are shown in a single taxon. Pancakes321 ( talk) 08:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
An image description reads: "The whip-like tentacles of Mastigoteuthis are covered with tiny suckers to catch small organisms like flypaper". The word flypaper links to a fly killing device which doesn't seem correct. Schmiphi ( talk) 10:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Squid has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 30, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Squid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Squid appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 February 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Izzy8484.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 10:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
okay with just mentioning Sepiolida and other squid orders in the second paragraph, but should we also try to include them in the taxobox somehow? It's a messy issue at this point. -- Chinasaur 17:10, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Yeah, you're right. It's good. -- Chinasaur
So this article says In American fish markets and restaurants, it is usually known by the Greek plural calamari. But Wiktionary:Calamari#Etymology says It. calamari also Fr. calmar, Int. calamar Which one is right? - Cjensen 23:38, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I didn't see any reference to the mantle in this article. I've added the word in the sentence "Like all cephalopods, squids are distinguished", but there may be a better place to mention it. Mantle (mollusc) does a good job of describing it, but has nothing specific to squids. - joe 19:05, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
The article states that male cuttlefish pretend to be female by hiding one pair of arms as females have 3 pairs. Surely all cuttlefish have 8 arms thus 4 pairs. Either editing or correction is needed
i need the physical discribtion of the squid. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkavuru ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
If we're going to mention that they're "popular as food" in the first line of the article, ought we add a note about the popularity of tentacle porn? Njál 01:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Its certainly not popular in English cuisine and there are no known English squid dishes. Tastes great but only usual eaten in England in Italian, Spanish, Chinese dishes etc. Will edit main text. JDN
please make more info om the squid. i'm making a 5-page essay on it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.200.116.131 ( talk • contribs) .
A mention of average lifespan should be added, I don't know anything about squids so I can't. -- Plankton5005 06:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Squid is also used as slang for an underclassman, more specifically a freshman in highshool. Also used as a slang for a person that knowingly breaks the law, litters and shows disrespect for others. Squids in this respect think only about what is best for them and not what effect they have on other people or groups of people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.80.160.16 ( talk) 18:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC).
One of the questions a Physics assignment I saw recently asked how squids are able to navigate below the "crush pressure". Personally I'd never heard of such a thing, but in case someone here knows it's another tidbit which could be added. I'll look on Google to see if I can find some answers. -- Oreckel 01:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
wht do s2quids eat —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.14.255.81 ( talk) 22:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC).
Can squids live in saltwater? (I'm asuming they can, but the article doesn't mention, so I thought I'd ask. It's for a project.) JimmmyThePiep 08:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Squids Live In Dens Right? I Dont Remember... -Alyssa
The only place the cuttlebone is mentioned is in passing in the Squid as food section. I definately think the cuttlebone deserves mention (or at least a link) in the anatomy of the squid, as it is one of the more notable structures a squid has. And don't ask me to write it, because I'm definately no expert.-- Vlmastra 20:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Is squid cooked in its own ink a real dish, or fiction? It sounds, um, somewhat less than delicious. Chris 06:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Aren't we getting a little off course J.H.McDonnell ( talk) 14:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
I removed some of the images in the classification to prevent image stacking, something that is expressly discouraged by WP:IMAGES and WP:IUP. I also added what is a Wikimedia Commons Featured Picture as the cuisine image. VanTucky (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Several of the external links at the bottom of the page do not work (Squidcam--I was disappointed--and the Scientific American Article). If several weeks go by from the time of this post and they are still inoperable we might want to remove them. 67.88.117.162 07:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Can someone edit the offensive material in this article?: The mouth of the squid is equipped with a sharp horny dick that feels amazing in ur butt mainly made of chitin [1] and cross-linked ... 65.209.244.4 20:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
What do squid eat? What role do they serve in the ocean ecology (other than as food for whales). How are they affected by global warming? What ocean environments are best/least suited for squid? -- ☑ SamuelWantman 03:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I have a zoology textbook that says the giant squid (Architeuthis) is ~60ft in length. What should we do about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.136.212 ( talk) 16:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Also, There is this recent review on the Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni that is more relevant than the current link [1]
References
On the February 8, 2009, episode of American Dad, a key plot point had Francine Smith get an article published in "Ocean Digest" magazine, ostensibly about the Colossal squid. In fact, the left page of the magazine had this chunk of text from Wikipedia's Squid article ("Squid have differentiated from their ancestral molluscs in such a way that the body plan has been condensed antero-posteriorly and extended dorso-ventrally. What before may have been the foot of the ancestor is now modified into a complex set of tentacles and highly developed sense organs, including advanced eyes similar to those of vertebrates. The shell of the ancestor has been lost, with only an internal gladius, or pen, remaining.") and the right page had a passage from the Giant squid article. - Dravecky ( talk) 01:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
How intelligent are squid? How do they communicate. It might sound funny, but a CBS new clip on Giant Squid showed one being reeled in and it sounded like the squid was making a squeek. When I took a fish farming class we were told that lobsters yell when dropped into boiling water, so what is with this? What kind of brain do they have, how big is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.17.39 ( talk) 02:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Italic text
I simplified the classification in the text to include just those groups referred to as squid, which is no more than a familiar term for a marine animal with 10 arms projecting from its head. Other coleoids can be linked from that page or from the Cephalopod article. If anyone really thinks that superfluous redundancy makes for a better article, go a head and revert. Regards J.H.McDonnell ( talk) 14:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Chtenopteryx sicula2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
A story in the news about a woman who ate squid and got a surprise.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 12:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Is this particular detail really relevant?
According to the WoRMS [1] Teuthida is a nomen dubium (includes [Myopsida + Oegopsida] which are not demonstrated to form a clade). So Myopsida [2] and Oegopsida [3] are no longer suborders but orders. Any comment? DenesFeri ( talk) 11:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I always thought squids had six legs. Is the first paragraph in error? I would attempt to correct the apparent error, but the article is protected. So I am asking if it is an error. 68.100.116.118 ( talk) 01:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
According to the Wikipedia article about Decapodiformes, squids and cuttlefish has ten arms. This article claims the number of arms is eight. This claim should be corrected in one of the articles. The name Decapodiformes suggests ten arms. !-- End request --> 81.191.82.225 ( talk) 18:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Squid. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
The link under "evolution" to the article for "foot" gives the article for the human foot, not mollusk foot, which is this link. /info/en/?search=Mollusca#Foot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levhatorah ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 ( talk · contribs) 19:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Currently Squid is in an unusual situiation of having an {{ infobox}} instead of and {{ Automatic taxobox}} or {{ Paraphyletic group}}. The included {{ taxonbar}} indicates the taxon should be Teuthida, which is a redirect to the Squid page. The taxon is accepted from what I can see. If it is monophyletic then an {{ Automatic taxobox}} should be added. If it is paraphyletic or polyphyletic then {{ Paraphyletic group}} should be used. If for some reason the Squid article would like to divorce itself from the Teuthida concept, then that page should be created. Honestly though, I think it could be easily fixed with an {{ Automatic taxobox}} and then stating that vampire squid are not true squid and that cuttlefish are. -- Nessie ( talk) 18:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
|from=Q81900
in the {{
taxonbar}} go to, then?* Keep separate. Merging would be an easy solution, but not the correct one. Yes, Decapodiformes is a pretty short article, but it is the parent taxa of squids and not equivalent to it. Particularly the extinct order Boletzkyida and the clade Belemnoidea are "not" squids. Squid-like, squid ancestors maybe, but not squids. Likewise, the taxobox for squid should not equate squids with the superorder Decapodiformes as it does presently.
Loopy30 (
talk)
01:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)
These articles are not very clear and quite confusing for a layperson who wants to look up the internal systematics of the Cephalopoda.
If it is still unclear, that and the current consensus should be mentioned everywhere.
I assume that until recently, only Teuthida were commonly called "squids" and were found to be paraphyletic because they probably contain the cuttlefish?
Teuthida redirects to this article, yet it isn't mentioned other than being an order that is part of Decapodiformes (in the infobox to the right) with the remark nomen dubium. What were and happened to Teuthida? In this talk page above, it is proposed that this should be mentioned in a stub page. Either that, or it should be mentioned in
Decapodiformes, instead of simply linking to itself.
In my opinion, this is relevant, because information regarding Teutida, although obsolete, is still commonly found outside of the English Wikipedia.
Cephalopod#Taxonomy also seperates cuttlefish from squid, it also mentions Teuthida which links to this article. If the information in the article decapodiformes is correct, than the taxonomy in the article Cephalopoda is simply outdated and wrong, isn't it? The phylogenetic tree on that article (
Cephalopod#Phylogeny) includes sepiida in decapodiformes, although it mentions "The attachment of the clade including Sepia and Spirula is unclear; either of the points marked with an asterisk may represent the root of this clade." (whatever exactly that means... how could that clade possibly include itself? In the first place, why are there genera like Sepia and not the order Sepiida shown?)
The
sepiida article as well clearly seperates cuttlefish from squid and implies in the very first sentence that "squid" are an order, yet that word links to "Decapodiforma" which is a superorder that seems to include cuttlefish. If it is true that cuttlefish are now in the superorder of squid, even if they have their anatomical specialities, it just should be mentioned there.
I have trouble understanding this sentence in
Squid#Taxonomy_and_phylogeny: "Orders are shown in boldface; all the families not included in those orders, except Sepiadariidae and Sepiidae are in the paraphyletic order "Sepiida", are in the paraphyletic order "Oegopsida". Everything after the first comma doesn't grammatically make sense to me.
-- 2003:F6:2717:1400:BDF6:C51C:B722:51E8 ( talk) 20:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change of grammar and spelling RPG2428 ( talk) 23:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
In the Schmitt trigger diagram I assume the signal U isn't an example from an squid's axon - just a arbitrary example of a varying analogue signal. I propose making the wording more clearly reflect this. Jonpatterns ( talk) 14:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the section on sensory parts, I notice that 3 cm is not 1 inch. Search for " 3 cm (1 in)" I don't know which length is correct, I'm afraid. 2A01:4C8:801:FB34:3D09:D99:9185:EE1A ( talk) 12:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Squids are a type of decapodiform, but that doesn’t mean they’re synonymous. Cuttlefish are decapodiformes, but they are not squids. There should be a separate page for decapodiformes. Am spooky ocapus ( talk) 22:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change ‘An inhalant siphon behind the funnel draws water into the mantel cavity via a valve.’
To ‘An inhalant siphon behind the funnel draws water into the mantle cavity via a valve.’
mantle is mis-spelled 213.165.186.61 ( talk) 12:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
1. bottletail/pyjama squids are shown to be distantly related to cuttlefishes, when they are a family of sepiida
2. the pygmy squids are a family within the order sepiolida (not to be confused with sepiida, the cuttlefishes), and not a seperate order.
3. Oegopsida is split into many families and subfamilies while Myopsida and Spiruila are shown in a single taxon. Pancakes321 ( talk) 08:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
An image description reads: "The whip-like tentacles of Mastigoteuthis are covered with tiny suckers to catch small organisms like flypaper". The word flypaper links to a fly killing device which doesn't seem correct. Schmiphi ( talk) 10:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)