On 7 May 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Spyro (series) to Spyro. The result of the discussion was moved. |
I just got the page started with what I remember from the games. Expand the info on the games and include a list of characters.- B-101 12:47, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I made a revert to this page, since the anon seemed to remove a lot of info and ruin the formatting. I encourage him to add to the article instead of course. — siro χ o
I think this page should be protected due to a number of anonymous IP address's making disruptive edits and stating them as though they are fact, and continue to re-add them if they are undone. - Jak Fisher ( talk • contribs) 23/1/13
Anyone know WHY Insomniac stopped developing the Spyro games? I was just wondering. User:68.229.103.250 19:12, 24 July 2005
Would a list of the eggs in Spyro Three be a welcome addition or an unwelcome annoyance? Would it be suitable as a separate article? I'm ready to add it if it would be desirable. Mikereichold 19:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
The The Legend of Spyro: A New Beginning section needs to be made more encyclopedaic. A quote from the publisher's website is an easy start, but we need more info than just that -- including citations. Stratadrake 05:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I have edited the article which I posted yesterday, and called the info. There a "sales pitch", that way people will know it won't be encyclopedic because no such proper info exists at this time. Also, in the External Links section I added the offical webpage for the new game. Hope that is all you needed me to fix! ~*Neal*~ User:216.180.216.66 17:36, 16 April 2006
The Series page should still exist, but have summaries of each game's plot. Maybe each game should have it's own page, too. And each game page would have characters from that game, maybe more parts of the storyline added to its synopsis, etc... And the characters of the series, maybe we could keep that, but a little part of me is leaning toward "List of canonical characters from the Spyro Series" sorta thing.
I really don't think each character in the game needs their own pages. At the very least, they should be merged into one page for heroes and one for villians. Most of the pages have one or two sentences at most. -- Awiseman 20:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Say, do we have the right pictures? And appropriate ones? Ones with the actual polygon selves and then maybe a picture of them drawn? Do you guys think we should ahve a "Protagonists" and "Antagonists" page? Yes, I added those subsections to get everything more organized, but it seems it just made the article more listy... any thoughts? Abby724 00:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Every so often my mind goes to features that were in the first Spyro that I liked that were removed in the later series. In the first you could have much the same experience of going through the level by the fact that the killed-again creatures gave up a silver gem in the same way that they gave up the original gem. Collecting this gems also provided an extra man feature. Thus you could earn extra men by doing things that were skill improving. It also occaisionally coughed up little 1-up statues, artwork missing in later games. The new games use a kill the dragonfly fodder and one up flies extra man method that I don't like as much. On the plus side later games used Spyro's head as the 1-up head for current lives. Also, the original game allowed Spyro to roll using L1 and R1 that made him more manuverable and made Spyro more lifelike. User:Hackwrench 22:39, 31 May 2006
Well, someone here is sort of "unwikifying" it, as in messing up the categories, page format, and also, someone has been putting their own grammatical errors and childish things in it. If anyone finds the person who keeps on doing this, someone give 'em a good old lecture, okay? They've been adding info about upcoming games without citations, and putting POVs on here. Abby724 22:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Merge the characters and provide an overview of them here. Split the game titles to individual articles. I.e. actually make this page about the series as a whole. I think even separate summaries for each title are unnecessary - they can be introduced inline into a summary of the series. After all, a clear list can also be provided in a series box (and if minor characters are merged, the current series box can be cleaned up). zoney ♣ talk 10:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Quick question. What exactly is a "Riptoc" and how verifiable/notable is the term? I've yet to see this term actually used in a Spyro game (though I haven't touched Spyro Orange or Shadow Legacy), and a quick Google test resulted in about 900 items (by comparison, Rhynoc = 9,000 and Gnorc = 15,000), the top results of which were based on Wikipedia.
Maybe I have a hyperactive fancruft sensor, but... I have to challenge it. Ripto didn't have any minions in Ripto's Rage! besides Crush and Gulp (all other enemies were level-specific), and he definitely used Rhynocs in Attack of the Rhynocs. (I don't recall the Enter the Dragonfly or Season of Flame enemies too well at the moment....)
Info? -- Stratadrake 07:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I heard that the GBA game was called Spyro: Season of Fire. 67.188.172.165 19:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I have asked my favourite Spyro guide writer if I can use his guides for articles. If he says yes, some of you may be happy. If no, then just no. Don't guarentee he will say yes, this may be risky. -- Rossage Sausage 21:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry if this seems prudish, but the following paragraph, taken from the introduction, appears badly phrased and informal to me:
I propose that it is rewritten in a more formal style. My suggestion would be something like:
I would also add that there should probably be a source for mentioning the 'positive reviews', and a small section at the end about Vivendi's mostly negatively received takes on the series. Any opinions? Dragonfly888 19:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
In the introduction, there is a link to a Spyro the Dragon television series. Also, part of the page is used to list episodes of this series. After checking on the Internet Movie Database for this series, I found nothing on it and have come to a conclusion that it does not exist. I advise that everything related to this non-existing series be deleted at once. Michael Mad 19:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spyro DS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
(Time for my daily rant.) This needs to be cleaned up. Most of them are a short plot synopsis, with "It's up to Spyro and his friends to _____." Well, that's what I think. ~Crowstar~ crow calls 22:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw that someone was puzzled over a link to Uncharted: Drake's Fortune in the main article. Since there's no way I could start a talk page with an unanimous account, I'll just say that it was there due to relationships between Naughty Dog (Uncharted's developer) and Insomniac. Though now that we think of it, neither Crash (outside the Fusion mention), Jak, Resistance or Ratchet & Clank barely got a mention either.
I don't know if this will be worth the debate, but we could do with clarifying what kind of "see also" links at the bottom of the page would work out for the article, with reasonings added when on provision. Freqrexy 15:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe that it should be deleated because we don't have a flash games section for other game series that has flash games —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.132.150 ( talk) 01:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
A possible romance between Spyro and Cynder? -- Gp75motorsports 00:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Can this be cited please? The way I remember it, Insomniac had split with Universal who took the rights to Spyro along with them, they did not sell it on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.254.158 ( talk) 15:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:SpyrotheDragon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Has someone made an article for the upcoming CG movie? According to this film sales site, the title of the movie is called The Legend of Spyro. Of course, this could be merely a working title, but some (confirmed) information has already begun to leak in. Xlittlecloudx ( talk) 06:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok the movie is comin out in 10 days and there hasnt even been a trailer released, is this ferreal or fake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.97.184.73 ( talk) 06:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
"The main planet that the Realms are set on is Earth, in a supposedly undiscovered part." Okay what? This screams for a citation. It NEEDS one! Could someone turn something up on this? Wise dude321 ( talk) 01:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
After some cleanup I am ready to suggest the removal of the cleanup tag. If it is not agreed upon, I move that we compile a to-do list. Wise dude321 ( talk) 01:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Will there be a new Spyro game in the original series coming this year, apart from the film in the Legend of Spyro series? BulsaraAndDeacon ( talk) 02:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
What happened to the character articles, at least keep Spyro! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.130.155 ( talk) 10:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Someone needs to change an act of vandalism back. I was looking at this article, I wanted to know about the film. So I went to the film section--
--and saw the words "Tis a sham!" in place of whatever was there first.
I don't know what was, but someone please change it back to what it originally was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.90.185 ( talk) 00:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone know if any collections have been sold combining any of the original 10 Spyro (not newest 3 'Legend of' ones)? I've never run into any of the original ones as most game stores don't carry PS1 games any more. Sometimes old games get sold in anthologies and it could be interesting to list existing ones here. Tyciol ( talk) 02:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I've read the article, but I haven't seen any mention of the movie (or any link to an article for the movie). Why? Was the movie cancelled? 92.50.121.46 ( talk) 20:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Someone should update this section with information on the new Spyro game Activision has leaked out. It is called "Spyro's Kingdom". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.225.35.194 ( talk) 00:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Check this out!!!
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6298531.html
Confirmed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.63.204 ( talk) 04:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I think this page should probably be protected so that unregistered users can't edit it because twice now the page has been the subject of false information added by enregistered users. --- Steven Bjerke 14:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
www.SpyroDragon.com is activision approved
User:173.162.247.129 has been repeatedly putting false information on the cancelled Spyro Movie, despite being warned, thinking it's confirmed and repeatedly add false information back in (even though the source doesn't mention any Legend of Spyro movie, but possibilities of a Skylanders TV series and movie. -- Aura24 ( talk) 23:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Did Activision really sell the rights to Sony? I don't think this is right. Can someone find a source, maybe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.133.97 ( talk) 06:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This needs to be on the page somewhere, seirra and activision own the rights on it , and its a remaking of the broken " official website" thats posted on here now. it at least needs to be an external site.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinten Armijo ( talk • contribs) 04:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC) Members of activision had signed up to it and so i automatically asumed they owned the copyrights to it. My bad
Because we need to renew the copyrights, and the copyrights has currently been expired, and this has allready been approved, and random people removing it , is getting annoying and we dont want to go through all the trouble just to contact the wiki admin, just because someone doesnt know how the copyrights work.
For some reason i thought he was Asking why activision would sign up to A free hosting service because i didnt remove the forumoton.com off the bottom of the page.. My faultfor not reading him correctly.. That happens when your fustrated.
Then you would understand how long it takes for copyrights to renew, and if it wasnt activision approved why was it sitting here on wiki for over 5 years? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.18.97.103 ( talk) 20:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Some reason just cause members from activison and serria had signed up gave me the big idea that it was approved.. I admit i was prtty dumb for automatically thinking that.
Okay will do.
Supposnly the members from activision and serria have nothing to do with this nor want anything to do with it.
Thats not even activisions...Hold on for a few weeks, i can't even say anything until the copyrights are renewed after that, ill contact one of the admins at activision and have him add all the info and stuff on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.18.97.103 ( talk) 21:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
This is the time i was trying to get them on here but apparently they have no control over stuff like this nor want anything to do with this.
"Spyrodragon.com" is not an official forum; this guy, Quinten Armijo, is infamous for going around on various Spyro communities trying to force admins to list his cheaply hosted site as "official." Take his fan site off the page if he puts it up again. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.190.133.97 (
talk)
06:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Your spyro fan forum doesnt count has various spyro forums stormy. And SpyroDragon.com has 27,000+ facebook likes, and is spyro related, official or not, it earnd its spot in external links, And there is no where on that site that says its official, obviously who ever made the site quinten Armijo, isn't infamous. And just saying that is being a typical hater..who the hell saus that? Anyway its external links. way to make yourself look like a hater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 22:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
If you look at the history for your IP address there are entries by Quinten Armijo. I also looked into your Facebook likes - it appears that you were using some other Spyro-related page to generate the like buttons. Regardless, Wikipedia is not the place to advertise personal websites, no matter how well-known they may or may not be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfstormy ( talk • contribs) 23:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Heres the code i use.
Its a link by link fb widget. That means people dont have to click like for the count to go up. People have to include the link SpyroDragon.com in there conversation or post for the like count to go up So for example if you post a status update saying SpyroDragon.com sucks...it wouldcount it as a like simply cause you included the link. Therefore The site isn't linked to any Facebook fan page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B002:123B:28FD:BB46:E4A:9602 ( talk) 23:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I only see a Google+ button with 12 likes, a Twitter button with 35, and a Facebook like button that no longer leads anywhere which could be for any page. I also looked up your website on Facebook, as well, and there is no SpyroDragon.org page except your personal Facebook account, "Quinten Armijo." Even if any of what you said was true, it doesn't matter how many Facebook likes a page has. Fan websites do not belong on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is for information. Advertising should be done elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfstormy ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Again its a link widget its only connected To the link you put the code on.
Try it yourself
http://help.forumotion.com/t144833p30-loading-page-is-not-working?nid=134#993694
If you look at the style sheet he's using forumotion.com's simple Facebook widgit...vwich means it can't be connected to any other page. And its external links. That means anything that has to do with Spyro. So if a Spyro site has that Manny Spyro fans. Why the heck is it not on wiki! Why are you so desert to keep it off you have something against it? Hate to be rude but your acting jealous over this guy especially when I found out it was already sitting here on wiki for 6 years... Give the man his spot back. There's no reason why it shouldn't remain here
What?
Using a certain widget can't restrict which pages can be connected. Also curious how you would explain the only four pages of users on your actual site.
Tell me how to connect a facebook page to this one then
@Spyro: it was remade , it was made 2005 we had over 80k Members , then I deleted it and remade it from scratch , the likes stayed, but all the members were lost. the new creation date is 2013 so their I explained why we don't have so many members anymore.
The point is, no matter how many likes is has, ""fan sites do not belong on Wikipedia!"" The article is locked now, anyway, so there's no use arguing about it anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfstormy ( talk • contribs) 23:55, 30 June 2014
I've protected the article for 2 days. This is so you can both/all continue to work on achieving consensus without the temptation of edit warring over whatever it is that you disagree about. The worst thing you can do is to go quiet here, and start edit warring again when the protection expires. For the record, I have no interest in the topic, I just want to ensure that we do things according to our policies, guidelines, and common sense. — SMALL JIM 00:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
It's just a minor issue of whether the External links section should have a link to a fan-made discussion forum or not. "75.70.218.39" insists that the site belongs on the page, but if you refer to comments made by GSK above under the section SpyroDragon.com, you'll see that the concerns about the legitimacy and notability of the site were never addressed, and he has no interest in consensus. He has been trying to get almost every website and page relating to this series to link to his website for years - obviously trying to promote a personal website. I understand we are supposed to reach a consensus, but in my opinion this should be a very clear issue about what does and doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Sfstormy ( talk) 00:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Its not a fan site I can tell you that right now. I've looked at.. Its not the official neither a fan site... I've read a few topics in their. And it made me believe the owner created a whole new religion..that's prob why hes sensitive with it not being on wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B002:123B:28FD:BB46:E4A:9602 ( talk) 00:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
There's not really another category between fan made and official site.... I'm putting a section up in external links/noticeboard now; thanks, Barek. Sfstormy ( talk) 00:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Idk but I think this deserves a spot somewhere on the this wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B002:123B:28FD:BB46:E4A:9602 ( talk) 00:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Feel free to chime in on the section I've created for this dispute, then. Hopefully we'll get some opinions neutral opinions from others soon about whether or not it should be here. Sfstormy ( talk) 00:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm a neutral on this situation and I personally think it should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 01:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I didn't remove it I added it back 3 times — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 01:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Yea they are logged.. Look at the different I.PS. my IP did it 3 times.. Someone's I.p did it a buncha times. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 (
talk)
01:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I think it should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 ( talk) 01:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
i think sfstormy is being a jerk and kinda feel sorry for that forum owner cause the way hes being treated on here, im netrual about this and i say it should stay. sfstormy you sound deseprate just ftw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.63.48 ( talk) 04:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Just a note that stormy has also signed up To spyrodragon.com back in 2010 and changed her email to thisforumsucks@live.com
Yea hi, this is the real Quinten Armijo.
Who ever this hater is who feels obligated going around making fake youtube accounts fake google accounts and what ever other fake account you made, Good job at deceiving many. For all those people out there that think this is me, think about this, No where at any point in givin time have I ever put on my website tlos.openu2.com that it was the official, so srsly, Don't believe Anything but the source.. that's like hearing on bing that Subway is giving away free sandwiches and never going to subway to actually see if its true. Go to the Source of the water fall, not down the river where crap has been thrown in. If I'm not saying its the official spyro forum on the place my haters claim ( SpyroDragon.com) If theres nowhere on there saying it, then I never said it.. and again, to the hater .. Dam good job deceiving the entire SpyroForum.com community, and to who ever else believes in this nonsense. Thumbs up — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
160.3.195.211 (
talk)
07:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
See WP:External links/Noticeboard#Dispute on Spyro (series) external link for the discussion started by Sfstormy, which they referenced above. I have also notified a relevant WikiProject of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 01:21, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
My reasoning is why all of a sudden get rid of it when its been here for over 6 years..it's been on external links since 2008. And that's when his site was acualy c created...just why so suddenly remove it??? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 (
talk)
02:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Against like 1 person. Every once n a while. And no that's not intirely true there was stuff like this in the past about getting rid of it but it was accepted to stay on.. Now its like that all over again cause he had to remake the site from scratch. Everyone knew it was their and only the haters always tried getting rid of it. And obviously no one saw it seeing how it got all those likes .. I'm sure it being on wiki had a big effect for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 ( talk) 02:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
No im just saying that simply cause it was on wiki for 6 years is probably the reason for 20% of the likes, no matter what, removed or not it will continue to get likes, simply cause its not a fan forum. and theirs no man or woman on earth that can change that. a fan forum wouldent get that much likes, hate to say it but its impossible for a fan forum to receive such a thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 07:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
external links = Things that relate to the topic, SpyroDragon.com Obviously doesn't Relate to spyro any way shape or form? Not.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 07:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Either way, removed or kept it will allways continue to gain likes simply cause its Spyro's Forum. like it or not, you can tell everyone their fake, but anyone who acualy takes the time and acualy looks, and sees that the widget that spyrodragon.com uses can only be connected to the link the widget is on. and if people didn't care for it being on here for all these years, whawt makes you think theyd care for it being on here now? its not like they're going to randomly say they don't want it on here cause 2 people got jelous and want it so desperately to be removed. My point being, I like your idea of having netural opinions, but honestly if no one cared all this time, this is gonna be sittin for quite a while, like it has been. Which im fine with seeing how my sites gonna sit on wiki for another few years. Excuse my 1:22am spelling
acualy it is a source of information.. don't know something go ask them and theyd awnser within 24 hours — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 20:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
yea your right, random forum users aren't reliable, that's why spyrodragon.com isn't random.
Not if one of the forum users works for serria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 06:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Wrong on two levels - the source of the forum doesn't matter, ( see rules 10 and 11, it says forums are excluded, and rule 11 only makes exceptions for blogs and personal web pages of notable people) and you cannot just claim that someone at your site works for Sierra without evidence. Before, you were claiming to be a representative from Activision and never provided evidence of that, either. Also, since it is your website, it is conflict of interest to add it to a page (which I am sure you know since you are blatantly using Wikipedia for advertising) ( read here). Sfstormy ( talk) 11:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
To you maybe, well just see from netrual users, believe what you want to believe, the fact of the matter is. 1, Its spyro related 2. 2-3 former activisionist are signed up to it like it or not, Not something I have to prove to anyone. 3rdly , this is external links were talking about why do you sound so desperate to remove it from that? 4thy I just reached 28k fb likes today, I don't think wikipidea had anything to that rather than the common sense everyone knows that its Spyro's Forum and it does meet rull 11, because they're are notable people, if their wernt why the heck is everyone liking it, rather than you two people? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 23:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
first off you have no authority to warn me. and rull 11 , execpions if the forum has notable people. if anything you should be warned for desperately wanting this site that should be on here gone just cause you can't get that many likes yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 04:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Nowhere in their did it say " I want this removed " all I saw was the sites wernt official. Why don't you just make everyone happy and make a new section called " Spyro Related Sites" Seeing how your so desperate for this. and if you read up a netural user said he wanted it to stay, so that's 1v1 so far..
My I.p is 75.70.218.39
the Neutral user that said he wanted it to stay was
2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916
Aka. NOT ME. and you got 1 person to say no, and I got 1 person to say yes so its a tie, don't over react to your 1 person who agrees with you, first one to hit 10 ppl should be the awnser if it stays or goes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 04:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
This is not a vote. Two other people besides me are removing your edits. You have not gained consensus. Sfstormy ( talk) 04:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
I think it should stay in external links..I don't think I should have to explain myself cause its self explainatory why it should stay. and sfstormy is just being a desperate jerk. Keep it on external links dude. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.181.63.48 (
talk)
04:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
you guys replaced spyrodragon.com with a dumb promotional site.. r u kidding me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100e:b004:849e:c47f:5d8a:d0ec:8e65 ( talk • contribs) 04:55, 16 July 2014
Hey guys (if anyone ever checks this page...), can we talk about why people are adding "Legend of Spyro and" before "Skylanders" in the film section? If you are someone who has been doing this, can you provide a citation that proves Activision has interest in a Legend of Spyro movie? I have been removing it because I've heard nothing about this at all, and it seems like either wishful thinking or attempted trolling, especially when accompanied with no source. I believe it was also marked with "citation needed" before, but someone removed the tag and reverted it back. Sfstormy ( talk) 17:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I think that List of Spyro characters should be split up and then merged to Spyro (series) as well as The Legend of Spyro. The list does not have any real world information, and there are only three sources. Also, someone said that it may not meet WP:GNG. DJ Autagirl ( talk) 17:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I just went on the Spyro series page to see all the changes, but you listed TLOS series as a spin-off along with Skylanders, but it is a reboot, not a spin-off. Skylanders is a Spin-off, but not TLOS. So I think it would be necessary remake this, to make TLOS as a reboot and Skylanders as a Spin-off
However, I just now made some alterations to the spyro page that I hope everyone will find agreeable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.67.7 ( talk) 18:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
' TLOS the movie ' is also the name for a hard science fiction film currently live on kickstarter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.176.215 ( talk) 10:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
There is NO DOUBT that Spyro is coming to a remaster.
https://twitter.com/SpyroTheDragon/status/981578215029264384
Everybody chant his name and try to summon ActiVision! /s --- seriously though, i'm super excited. hoping it's as good as the crash trilogy
CrashRocks1419 ( talk) 19:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
it just leaked CrashRocks1419 ( talk) 11:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Someone should edit all the spin-offs games in the timeline, I mean all Skylanders and those almost unknown minor Spyro games, also we need clear official statements about what is a spin-off and what is a reboot.
-- Metbert ( talk) 19:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Skylanders Spyros Adventure is officially the only Skylanders title in the "Spyro" series. The rest of them are not spyro and are spinoffs. My recommendation is, for proper information and clarity, keep Skylanders SA in the article, leave the rest out, and lock the page from editing until September when S:RT releases on the 21st of September. People keep changing the page and adding all skylanders products and that is not proper. Only the first skylanders is a spyro game. Cammers1995 ( talk) 02:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Spyro the Dragon (video game) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Andrewa ( talk) 17:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 7 May 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Spyro (series) to Spyro. The result of the discussion was moved. |
I just got the page started with what I remember from the games. Expand the info on the games and include a list of characters.- B-101 12:47, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I made a revert to this page, since the anon seemed to remove a lot of info and ruin the formatting. I encourage him to add to the article instead of course. — siro χ o
I think this page should be protected due to a number of anonymous IP address's making disruptive edits and stating them as though they are fact, and continue to re-add them if they are undone. - Jak Fisher ( talk • contribs) 23/1/13
Anyone know WHY Insomniac stopped developing the Spyro games? I was just wondering. User:68.229.103.250 19:12, 24 July 2005
Would a list of the eggs in Spyro Three be a welcome addition or an unwelcome annoyance? Would it be suitable as a separate article? I'm ready to add it if it would be desirable. Mikereichold 19:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
The The Legend of Spyro: A New Beginning section needs to be made more encyclopedaic. A quote from the publisher's website is an easy start, but we need more info than just that -- including citations. Stratadrake 05:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I have edited the article which I posted yesterday, and called the info. There a "sales pitch", that way people will know it won't be encyclopedic because no such proper info exists at this time. Also, in the External Links section I added the offical webpage for the new game. Hope that is all you needed me to fix! ~*Neal*~ User:216.180.216.66 17:36, 16 April 2006
The Series page should still exist, but have summaries of each game's plot. Maybe each game should have it's own page, too. And each game page would have characters from that game, maybe more parts of the storyline added to its synopsis, etc... And the characters of the series, maybe we could keep that, but a little part of me is leaning toward "List of canonical characters from the Spyro Series" sorta thing.
I really don't think each character in the game needs their own pages. At the very least, they should be merged into one page for heroes and one for villians. Most of the pages have one or two sentences at most. -- Awiseman 20:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Say, do we have the right pictures? And appropriate ones? Ones with the actual polygon selves and then maybe a picture of them drawn? Do you guys think we should ahve a "Protagonists" and "Antagonists" page? Yes, I added those subsections to get everything more organized, but it seems it just made the article more listy... any thoughts? Abby724 00:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Every so often my mind goes to features that were in the first Spyro that I liked that were removed in the later series. In the first you could have much the same experience of going through the level by the fact that the killed-again creatures gave up a silver gem in the same way that they gave up the original gem. Collecting this gems also provided an extra man feature. Thus you could earn extra men by doing things that were skill improving. It also occaisionally coughed up little 1-up statues, artwork missing in later games. The new games use a kill the dragonfly fodder and one up flies extra man method that I don't like as much. On the plus side later games used Spyro's head as the 1-up head for current lives. Also, the original game allowed Spyro to roll using L1 and R1 that made him more manuverable and made Spyro more lifelike. User:Hackwrench 22:39, 31 May 2006
Well, someone here is sort of "unwikifying" it, as in messing up the categories, page format, and also, someone has been putting their own grammatical errors and childish things in it. If anyone finds the person who keeps on doing this, someone give 'em a good old lecture, okay? They've been adding info about upcoming games without citations, and putting POVs on here. Abby724 22:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Merge the characters and provide an overview of them here. Split the game titles to individual articles. I.e. actually make this page about the series as a whole. I think even separate summaries for each title are unnecessary - they can be introduced inline into a summary of the series. After all, a clear list can also be provided in a series box (and if minor characters are merged, the current series box can be cleaned up). zoney ♣ talk 10:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Quick question. What exactly is a "Riptoc" and how verifiable/notable is the term? I've yet to see this term actually used in a Spyro game (though I haven't touched Spyro Orange or Shadow Legacy), and a quick Google test resulted in about 900 items (by comparison, Rhynoc = 9,000 and Gnorc = 15,000), the top results of which were based on Wikipedia.
Maybe I have a hyperactive fancruft sensor, but... I have to challenge it. Ripto didn't have any minions in Ripto's Rage! besides Crush and Gulp (all other enemies were level-specific), and he definitely used Rhynocs in Attack of the Rhynocs. (I don't recall the Enter the Dragonfly or Season of Flame enemies too well at the moment....)
Info? -- Stratadrake 07:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I heard that the GBA game was called Spyro: Season of Fire. 67.188.172.165 19:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I have asked my favourite Spyro guide writer if I can use his guides for articles. If he says yes, some of you may be happy. If no, then just no. Don't guarentee he will say yes, this may be risky. -- Rossage Sausage 21:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry if this seems prudish, but the following paragraph, taken from the introduction, appears badly phrased and informal to me:
I propose that it is rewritten in a more formal style. My suggestion would be something like:
I would also add that there should probably be a source for mentioning the 'positive reviews', and a small section at the end about Vivendi's mostly negatively received takes on the series. Any opinions? Dragonfly888 19:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
In the introduction, there is a link to a Spyro the Dragon television series. Also, part of the page is used to list episodes of this series. After checking on the Internet Movie Database for this series, I found nothing on it and have come to a conclusion that it does not exist. I advise that everything related to this non-existing series be deleted at once. Michael Mad 19:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spyro DS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
(Time for my daily rant.) This needs to be cleaned up. Most of them are a short plot synopsis, with "It's up to Spyro and his friends to _____." Well, that's what I think. ~Crowstar~ crow calls 22:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw that someone was puzzled over a link to Uncharted: Drake's Fortune in the main article. Since there's no way I could start a talk page with an unanimous account, I'll just say that it was there due to relationships between Naughty Dog (Uncharted's developer) and Insomniac. Though now that we think of it, neither Crash (outside the Fusion mention), Jak, Resistance or Ratchet & Clank barely got a mention either.
I don't know if this will be worth the debate, but we could do with clarifying what kind of "see also" links at the bottom of the page would work out for the article, with reasonings added when on provision. Freqrexy 15:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe that it should be deleated because we don't have a flash games section for other game series that has flash games —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.132.150 ( talk) 01:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
A possible romance between Spyro and Cynder? -- Gp75motorsports 00:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Can this be cited please? The way I remember it, Insomniac had split with Universal who took the rights to Spyro along with them, they did not sell it on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.254.158 ( talk) 15:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:SpyrotheDragon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Has someone made an article for the upcoming CG movie? According to this film sales site, the title of the movie is called The Legend of Spyro. Of course, this could be merely a working title, but some (confirmed) information has already begun to leak in. Xlittlecloudx ( talk) 06:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok the movie is comin out in 10 days and there hasnt even been a trailer released, is this ferreal or fake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.97.184.73 ( talk) 06:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
"The main planet that the Realms are set on is Earth, in a supposedly undiscovered part." Okay what? This screams for a citation. It NEEDS one! Could someone turn something up on this? Wise dude321 ( talk) 01:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
After some cleanup I am ready to suggest the removal of the cleanup tag. If it is not agreed upon, I move that we compile a to-do list. Wise dude321 ( talk) 01:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Will there be a new Spyro game in the original series coming this year, apart from the film in the Legend of Spyro series? BulsaraAndDeacon ( talk) 02:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
What happened to the character articles, at least keep Spyro! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.130.155 ( talk) 10:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Someone needs to change an act of vandalism back. I was looking at this article, I wanted to know about the film. So I went to the film section--
--and saw the words "Tis a sham!" in place of whatever was there first.
I don't know what was, but someone please change it back to what it originally was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.90.185 ( talk) 00:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone know if any collections have been sold combining any of the original 10 Spyro (not newest 3 'Legend of' ones)? I've never run into any of the original ones as most game stores don't carry PS1 games any more. Sometimes old games get sold in anthologies and it could be interesting to list existing ones here. Tyciol ( talk) 02:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I've read the article, but I haven't seen any mention of the movie (or any link to an article for the movie). Why? Was the movie cancelled? 92.50.121.46 ( talk) 20:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Someone should update this section with information on the new Spyro game Activision has leaked out. It is called "Spyro's Kingdom". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.225.35.194 ( talk) 00:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Check this out!!!
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6298531.html
Confirmed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.63.204 ( talk) 04:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I think this page should probably be protected so that unregistered users can't edit it because twice now the page has been the subject of false information added by enregistered users. --- Steven Bjerke 14:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
www.SpyroDragon.com is activision approved
User:173.162.247.129 has been repeatedly putting false information on the cancelled Spyro Movie, despite being warned, thinking it's confirmed and repeatedly add false information back in (even though the source doesn't mention any Legend of Spyro movie, but possibilities of a Skylanders TV series and movie. -- Aura24 ( talk) 23:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Did Activision really sell the rights to Sony? I don't think this is right. Can someone find a source, maybe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.133.97 ( talk) 06:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This needs to be on the page somewhere, seirra and activision own the rights on it , and its a remaking of the broken " official website" thats posted on here now. it at least needs to be an external site.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinten Armijo ( talk • contribs) 04:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC) Members of activision had signed up to it and so i automatically asumed they owned the copyrights to it. My bad
Because we need to renew the copyrights, and the copyrights has currently been expired, and this has allready been approved, and random people removing it , is getting annoying and we dont want to go through all the trouble just to contact the wiki admin, just because someone doesnt know how the copyrights work.
For some reason i thought he was Asking why activision would sign up to A free hosting service because i didnt remove the forumoton.com off the bottom of the page.. My faultfor not reading him correctly.. That happens when your fustrated.
Then you would understand how long it takes for copyrights to renew, and if it wasnt activision approved why was it sitting here on wiki for over 5 years? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.18.97.103 ( talk) 20:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Some reason just cause members from activison and serria had signed up gave me the big idea that it was approved.. I admit i was prtty dumb for automatically thinking that.
Okay will do.
Supposnly the members from activision and serria have nothing to do with this nor want anything to do with it.
Thats not even activisions...Hold on for a few weeks, i can't even say anything until the copyrights are renewed after that, ill contact one of the admins at activision and have him add all the info and stuff on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.18.97.103 ( talk) 21:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
This is the time i was trying to get them on here but apparently they have no control over stuff like this nor want anything to do with this.
"Spyrodragon.com" is not an official forum; this guy, Quinten Armijo, is infamous for going around on various Spyro communities trying to force admins to list his cheaply hosted site as "official." Take his fan site off the page if he puts it up again. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.190.133.97 (
talk)
06:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Your spyro fan forum doesnt count has various spyro forums stormy. And SpyroDragon.com has 27,000+ facebook likes, and is spyro related, official or not, it earnd its spot in external links, And there is no where on that site that says its official, obviously who ever made the site quinten Armijo, isn't infamous. And just saying that is being a typical hater..who the hell saus that? Anyway its external links. way to make yourself look like a hater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 22:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
If you look at the history for your IP address there are entries by Quinten Armijo. I also looked into your Facebook likes - it appears that you were using some other Spyro-related page to generate the like buttons. Regardless, Wikipedia is not the place to advertise personal websites, no matter how well-known they may or may not be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfstormy ( talk • contribs) 23:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Heres the code i use.
Its a link by link fb widget. That means people dont have to click like for the count to go up. People have to include the link SpyroDragon.com in there conversation or post for the like count to go up So for example if you post a status update saying SpyroDragon.com sucks...it wouldcount it as a like simply cause you included the link. Therefore The site isn't linked to any Facebook fan page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B002:123B:28FD:BB46:E4A:9602 ( talk) 23:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I only see a Google+ button with 12 likes, a Twitter button with 35, and a Facebook like button that no longer leads anywhere which could be for any page. I also looked up your website on Facebook, as well, and there is no SpyroDragon.org page except your personal Facebook account, "Quinten Armijo." Even if any of what you said was true, it doesn't matter how many Facebook likes a page has. Fan websites do not belong on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is for information. Advertising should be done elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfstormy ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Again its a link widget its only connected To the link you put the code on.
Try it yourself
http://help.forumotion.com/t144833p30-loading-page-is-not-working?nid=134#993694
If you look at the style sheet he's using forumotion.com's simple Facebook widgit...vwich means it can't be connected to any other page. And its external links. That means anything that has to do with Spyro. So if a Spyro site has that Manny Spyro fans. Why the heck is it not on wiki! Why are you so desert to keep it off you have something against it? Hate to be rude but your acting jealous over this guy especially when I found out it was already sitting here on wiki for 6 years... Give the man his spot back. There's no reason why it shouldn't remain here
What?
Using a certain widget can't restrict which pages can be connected. Also curious how you would explain the only four pages of users on your actual site.
Tell me how to connect a facebook page to this one then
@Spyro: it was remade , it was made 2005 we had over 80k Members , then I deleted it and remade it from scratch , the likes stayed, but all the members were lost. the new creation date is 2013 so their I explained why we don't have so many members anymore.
The point is, no matter how many likes is has, ""fan sites do not belong on Wikipedia!"" The article is locked now, anyway, so there's no use arguing about it anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfstormy ( talk • contribs) 23:55, 30 June 2014
I've protected the article for 2 days. This is so you can both/all continue to work on achieving consensus without the temptation of edit warring over whatever it is that you disagree about. The worst thing you can do is to go quiet here, and start edit warring again when the protection expires. For the record, I have no interest in the topic, I just want to ensure that we do things according to our policies, guidelines, and common sense. — SMALL JIM 00:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
It's just a minor issue of whether the External links section should have a link to a fan-made discussion forum or not. "75.70.218.39" insists that the site belongs on the page, but if you refer to comments made by GSK above under the section SpyroDragon.com, you'll see that the concerns about the legitimacy and notability of the site were never addressed, and he has no interest in consensus. He has been trying to get almost every website and page relating to this series to link to his website for years - obviously trying to promote a personal website. I understand we are supposed to reach a consensus, but in my opinion this should be a very clear issue about what does and doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Sfstormy ( talk) 00:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Its not a fan site I can tell you that right now. I've looked at.. Its not the official neither a fan site... I've read a few topics in their. And it made me believe the owner created a whole new religion..that's prob why hes sensitive with it not being on wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B002:123B:28FD:BB46:E4A:9602 ( talk) 00:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
There's not really another category between fan made and official site.... I'm putting a section up in external links/noticeboard now; thanks, Barek. Sfstormy ( talk) 00:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Idk but I think this deserves a spot somewhere on the this wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B002:123B:28FD:BB46:E4A:9602 ( talk) 00:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Feel free to chime in on the section I've created for this dispute, then. Hopefully we'll get some opinions neutral opinions from others soon about whether or not it should be here. Sfstormy ( talk) 00:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm a neutral on this situation and I personally think it should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 01:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I didn't remove it I added it back 3 times — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 01:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Yea they are logged.. Look at the different I.PS. my IP did it 3 times.. Someone's I.p did it a buncha times. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 (
talk)
01:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I think it should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 ( talk) 01:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
i think sfstormy is being a jerk and kinda feel sorry for that forum owner cause the way hes being treated on here, im netrual about this and i say it should stay. sfstormy you sound deseprate just ftw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.63.48 ( talk) 04:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Just a note that stormy has also signed up To spyrodragon.com back in 2010 and changed her email to thisforumsucks@live.com
Yea hi, this is the real Quinten Armijo.
Who ever this hater is who feels obligated going around making fake youtube accounts fake google accounts and what ever other fake account you made, Good job at deceiving many. For all those people out there that think this is me, think about this, No where at any point in givin time have I ever put on my website tlos.openu2.com that it was the official, so srsly, Don't believe Anything but the source.. that's like hearing on bing that Subway is giving away free sandwiches and never going to subway to actually see if its true. Go to the Source of the water fall, not down the river where crap has been thrown in. If I'm not saying its the official spyro forum on the place my haters claim ( SpyroDragon.com) If theres nowhere on there saying it, then I never said it.. and again, to the hater .. Dam good job deceiving the entire SpyroForum.com community, and to who ever else believes in this nonsense. Thumbs up — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
160.3.195.211 (
talk)
07:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
See WP:External links/Noticeboard#Dispute on Spyro (series) external link for the discussion started by Sfstormy, which they referenced above. I have also notified a relevant WikiProject of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 01:21, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
My reasoning is why all of a sudden get rid of it when its been here for over 6 years..it's been on external links since 2008. And that's when his site was acualy c created...just why so suddenly remove it??? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 (
talk)
02:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Against like 1 person. Every once n a while. And no that's not intirely true there was stuff like this in the past about getting rid of it but it was accepted to stay on.. Now its like that all over again cause he had to remake the site from scratch. Everyone knew it was their and only the haters always tried getting rid of it. And obviously no one saw it seeing how it got all those likes .. I'm sure it being on wiki had a big effect for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916 ( talk) 02:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
No im just saying that simply cause it was on wiki for 6 years is probably the reason for 20% of the likes, no matter what, removed or not it will continue to get likes, simply cause its not a fan forum. and theirs no man or woman on earth that can change that. a fan forum wouldent get that much likes, hate to say it but its impossible for a fan forum to receive such a thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 07:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
external links = Things that relate to the topic, SpyroDragon.com Obviously doesn't Relate to spyro any way shape or form? Not.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 07:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Either way, removed or kept it will allways continue to gain likes simply cause its Spyro's Forum. like it or not, you can tell everyone their fake, but anyone who acualy takes the time and acualy looks, and sees that the widget that spyrodragon.com uses can only be connected to the link the widget is on. and if people didn't care for it being on here for all these years, whawt makes you think theyd care for it being on here now? its not like they're going to randomly say they don't want it on here cause 2 people got jelous and want it so desperately to be removed. My point being, I like your idea of having netural opinions, but honestly if no one cared all this time, this is gonna be sittin for quite a while, like it has been. Which im fine with seeing how my sites gonna sit on wiki for another few years. Excuse my 1:22am spelling
acualy it is a source of information.. don't know something go ask them and theyd awnser within 24 hours — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 20:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
yea your right, random forum users aren't reliable, that's why spyrodragon.com isn't random.
Not if one of the forum users works for serria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 06:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Wrong on two levels - the source of the forum doesn't matter, ( see rules 10 and 11, it says forums are excluded, and rule 11 only makes exceptions for blogs and personal web pages of notable people) and you cannot just claim that someone at your site works for Sierra without evidence. Before, you were claiming to be a representative from Activision and never provided evidence of that, either. Also, since it is your website, it is conflict of interest to add it to a page (which I am sure you know since you are blatantly using Wikipedia for advertising) ( read here). Sfstormy ( talk) 11:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
To you maybe, well just see from netrual users, believe what you want to believe, the fact of the matter is. 1, Its spyro related 2. 2-3 former activisionist are signed up to it like it or not, Not something I have to prove to anyone. 3rdly , this is external links were talking about why do you sound so desperate to remove it from that? 4thy I just reached 28k fb likes today, I don't think wikipidea had anything to that rather than the common sense everyone knows that its Spyro's Forum and it does meet rull 11, because they're are notable people, if their wernt why the heck is everyone liking it, rather than you two people? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 23:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
first off you have no authority to warn me. and rull 11 , execpions if the forum has notable people. if anything you should be warned for desperately wanting this site that should be on here gone just cause you can't get that many likes yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 04:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Nowhere in their did it say " I want this removed " all I saw was the sites wernt official. Why don't you just make everyone happy and make a new section called " Spyro Related Sites" Seeing how your so desperate for this. and if you read up a netural user said he wanted it to stay, so that's 1v1 so far..
My I.p is 75.70.218.39
the Neutral user that said he wanted it to stay was
2600:100E:B01E:286B:9433:57B5:28CF:8916
Aka. NOT ME. and you got 1 person to say no, and I got 1 person to say yes so its a tie, don't over react to your 1 person who agrees with you, first one to hit 10 ppl should be the awnser if it stays or goes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.218.39 ( talk) 04:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
This is not a vote. Two other people besides me are removing your edits. You have not gained consensus. Sfstormy ( talk) 04:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
I think it should stay in external links..I don't think I should have to explain myself cause its self explainatory why it should stay. and sfstormy is just being a desperate jerk. Keep it on external links dude. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.181.63.48 (
talk)
04:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
you guys replaced spyrodragon.com with a dumb promotional site.. r u kidding me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100e:b004:849e:c47f:5d8a:d0ec:8e65 ( talk • contribs) 04:55, 16 July 2014
Hey guys (if anyone ever checks this page...), can we talk about why people are adding "Legend of Spyro and" before "Skylanders" in the film section? If you are someone who has been doing this, can you provide a citation that proves Activision has interest in a Legend of Spyro movie? I have been removing it because I've heard nothing about this at all, and it seems like either wishful thinking or attempted trolling, especially when accompanied with no source. I believe it was also marked with "citation needed" before, but someone removed the tag and reverted it back. Sfstormy ( talk) 17:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I think that List of Spyro characters should be split up and then merged to Spyro (series) as well as The Legend of Spyro. The list does not have any real world information, and there are only three sources. Also, someone said that it may not meet WP:GNG. DJ Autagirl ( talk) 17:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I just went on the Spyro series page to see all the changes, but you listed TLOS series as a spin-off along with Skylanders, but it is a reboot, not a spin-off. Skylanders is a Spin-off, but not TLOS. So I think it would be necessary remake this, to make TLOS as a reboot and Skylanders as a Spin-off
However, I just now made some alterations to the spyro page that I hope everyone will find agreeable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.67.7 ( talk) 18:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
' TLOS the movie ' is also the name for a hard science fiction film currently live on kickstarter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.176.215 ( talk) 10:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
There is NO DOUBT that Spyro is coming to a remaster.
https://twitter.com/SpyroTheDragon/status/981578215029264384
Everybody chant his name and try to summon ActiVision! /s --- seriously though, i'm super excited. hoping it's as good as the crash trilogy
CrashRocks1419 ( talk) 19:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
it just leaked CrashRocks1419 ( talk) 11:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Someone should edit all the spin-offs games in the timeline, I mean all Skylanders and those almost unknown minor Spyro games, also we need clear official statements about what is a spin-off and what is a reboot.
-- Metbert ( talk) 19:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Skylanders Spyros Adventure is officially the only Skylanders title in the "Spyro" series. The rest of them are not spyro and are spinoffs. My recommendation is, for proper information and clarity, keep Skylanders SA in the article, leave the rest out, and lock the page from editing until September when S:RT releases on the 21st of September. People keep changing the page and adding all skylanders products and that is not proper. Only the first skylanders is a spyro game. Cammers1995 ( talk) 02:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Spyro the Dragon (video game) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Andrewa ( talk) 17:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)