This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Spolia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wanted to put Bibliography after See also per Wikipedia:See also#Standard appendices and descriptions but then changed mind and did not hit Undo enough times. -- 84.20.17.84 09:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
By the way, the thumbnail of that lovely chart of the Arch of Constantine doesn't show up on my browser; although the image itself displays clearly when I click on it. This may only be a problem on my end; but has anyone else noticed the same thing? -- Javits2000 13:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
The caption on this page says, "Fragments of Greek inscriptions in the masonry of the Ottoman Heptapyrgion (Yedikule) fortress (1431), Thessaloniki." However, the description on the image page, File:THES-Heptapyrgion spolia 3.jpg, claims that the inscription is Roman.-- Duesouthfan ( talk) 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Spolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Spolia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wanted to put Bibliography after See also per Wikipedia:See also#Standard appendices and descriptions but then changed mind and did not hit Undo enough times. -- 84.20.17.84 09:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
By the way, the thumbnail of that lovely chart of the Arch of Constantine doesn't show up on my browser; although the image itself displays clearly when I click on it. This may only be a problem on my end; but has anyone else noticed the same thing? -- Javits2000 13:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
The caption on this page says, "Fragments of Greek inscriptions in the masonry of the Ottoman Heptapyrgion (Yedikule) fortress (1431), Thessaloniki." However, the description on the image page, File:THES-Heptapyrgion spolia 3.jpg, claims that the inscription is Roman.-- Duesouthfan ( talk) 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Spolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)