This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Awful article. No real relevance. (This comment was added by Irishjp on 5 July 2007 at 15:10)
The result of the move request was: withdrawn/procedural close. This is TOTALLY a WP:IAR close since I'm involved: the nominator decided to take a different direction with the nomination, and no one else supported the initial nomination besides the nominator, so after closing this discussion, I will start another discussion with the nominator's new proposal. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 20:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Spits (newspaper) →
Spits – No other articles on Wikipedia called "Spits". (struck by nom on 17:17 18/4/23, see comment below.)
Tim O'Doherty (
talk) 19:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: withdrawn, I guess, is the best way of putting this close. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 16:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Spits (newspaper) → Sp!ts – as that's the way the masthead was stylised. (This is the rationale by Tim O'Doherty; I'm neutral.) Steel1943 ( talk) 20:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Avoid using special characters that are not pronounced, are included purely for decoration, or simply substitute for English words or letters (e.g., "♥" used for "love", "!" used for "i") ...". — BarrelProof ( talk) 23:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
If we had kept going with the original RfC, people may have decided to move it to Sp!ts..." because you decided to withdraw your entire nomination statement, change where you wanted the article to go, and the new title has issues exclusive from the original proposal to move the article to Spits; Spits has plural issues, and Sp!ts has MOS:TMRULES issues. (In fact, saying this now, I oppose this move myself, meaning every participant in the previous discussion [besides you, the previous discussion's nominator] opposes both proposals.) Either way, I'll honor the request to close this. Steel1943 ( talk) 16:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Awful article. No real relevance. (This comment was added by Irishjp on 5 July 2007 at 15:10)
The result of the move request was: withdrawn/procedural close. This is TOTALLY a WP:IAR close since I'm involved: the nominator decided to take a different direction with the nomination, and no one else supported the initial nomination besides the nominator, so after closing this discussion, I will start another discussion with the nominator's new proposal. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 20:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Spits (newspaper) →
Spits – No other articles on Wikipedia called "Spits". (struck by nom on 17:17 18/4/23, see comment below.)
Tim O'Doherty (
talk) 19:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: withdrawn, I guess, is the best way of putting this close. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 16:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Spits (newspaper) → Sp!ts – as that's the way the masthead was stylised. (This is the rationale by Tim O'Doherty; I'm neutral.) Steel1943 ( talk) 20:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Avoid using special characters that are not pronounced, are included purely for decoration, or simply substitute for English words or letters (e.g., "♥" used for "love", "!" used for "i") ...". — BarrelProof ( talk) 23:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
If we had kept going with the original RfC, people may have decided to move it to Sp!ts..." because you decided to withdraw your entire nomination statement, change where you wanted the article to go, and the new title has issues exclusive from the original proposal to move the article to Spits; Spits has plural issues, and Sp!ts has MOS:TMRULES issues. (In fact, saying this now, I oppose this move myself, meaning every participant in the previous discussion [besides you, the previous discussion's nominator] opposes both proposals.) Either way, I'll honor the request to close this. Steel1943 ( talk) 16:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)