This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article seems to lack a lot of information not to mention any alternate or opposing views which makes this article seem very biased and one-sided. I think the neutrality of this article should be called into question and anybody who knows more about this practice who has experience of it possibly anyone who knows any better about less harmful methods which are not abusive should come forward and report on this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.87.186 ( talk) 01:56, March 3, 2014 (UTC)
this article has alot of wrong concepts about islam and Ruqya I think the writer has a misunderstand about Ruqya Almost all of the article is wrong and the reference itself has nothing to do with islam Some muslim expert has to edit the article Hager gamal mohamed ( talk) 23:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superstitions in Muslim societies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstitions in Muslim societies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bookku ( talk) 05:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
here it is. Changed title, greatly expanded, removed about 4 tags.
Have worked on this for a couple of weeks (or at least it feels like it). -- Louis P. Boog ( talk) 20:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
doesn't the procedure also usually imply an invite to Islam? Before trying to excorcise the jinn, some scholars invite them to abandon their unbelief and become Muslims instead. Are there recrods in good sources about that? (also: awesome improvement of the article so far)-- VenusFeuerFalle ( talk) 23:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
What was the reason for moving this page from "Exorcism in Islam" to "Spirit possession and exorcism in Islam". The former title was more WP:CONCISE and WP:CONSISTENT with Exorcism in Christianity and Exorcism in the Catholic Church. VR talk 19:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Allah is the one 2600:2B00:766F:2000:9894:51DC:C68B:ECD ( talk) 03:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
For anyone wondering why there are so many bald statements in this article, like
and then instead of those statements being followed by a source, instead there is a citation needed tag, well, there did use to be a citation. Citations such as
Unfortunately, the sources in those citations have been decreed "biased" (meforum.org), or in the case of IslamQA, unapproved because the head of the site does not have academic credentials, and the citations were deleted. I maintain the sources and their information are credible, but I'm in the minority.-- Louis P. Boog ( talk) 21:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article seems to lack a lot of information not to mention any alternate or opposing views which makes this article seem very biased and one-sided. I think the neutrality of this article should be called into question and anybody who knows more about this practice who has experience of it possibly anyone who knows any better about less harmful methods which are not abusive should come forward and report on this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.87.186 ( talk) 01:56, March 3, 2014 (UTC)
this article has alot of wrong concepts about islam and Ruqya I think the writer has a misunderstand about Ruqya Almost all of the article is wrong and the reference itself has nothing to do with islam Some muslim expert has to edit the article Hager gamal mohamed ( talk) 23:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superstitions in Muslim societies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstitions in Muslim societies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bookku ( talk) 05:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
here it is. Changed title, greatly expanded, removed about 4 tags.
Have worked on this for a couple of weeks (or at least it feels like it). -- Louis P. Boog ( talk) 20:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
doesn't the procedure also usually imply an invite to Islam? Before trying to excorcise the jinn, some scholars invite them to abandon their unbelief and become Muslims instead. Are there recrods in good sources about that? (also: awesome improvement of the article so far)-- VenusFeuerFalle ( talk) 23:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
What was the reason for moving this page from "Exorcism in Islam" to "Spirit possession and exorcism in Islam". The former title was more WP:CONCISE and WP:CONSISTENT with Exorcism in Christianity and Exorcism in the Catholic Church. VR talk 19:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Allah is the one 2600:2B00:766F:2000:9894:51DC:C68B:ECD ( talk) 03:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
For anyone wondering why there are so many bald statements in this article, like
and then instead of those statements being followed by a source, instead there is a citation needed tag, well, there did use to be a citation. Citations such as
Unfortunately, the sources in those citations have been decreed "biased" (meforum.org), or in the case of IslamQA, unapproved because the head of the site does not have academic credentials, and the citations were deleted. I maintain the sources and their information are credible, but I'm in the minority.-- Louis P. Boog ( talk) 21:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)