This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
User:AussieLegend and User:Favre1fan93 are in dispute over the existence of this article with myself User:SanAnMan and User:Pokelova. Previous discussion regarding the dispute took place on SanAnMan's talk page and Pokelova's talk page.
Also, per WP:NOTTVGUIDE, we do not simply list episode air dates for upcoming episodes with no other info. In this case, a second piece of info is needed (title, director or writers) to have any episode rows unhidden.This is not stated at all in WP:NOTTVGUIDE. And even if it was, there is a second piece of information available, the production codes of the episodes. - SanAnMan ( talk) 16:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Look, I'm not trying to be a troublemaker or anything here, I'm an intelligent author who reads and understands written rules. I'm not just some dumb user. It's not fair to state that you had a purpose in mind when writing a MOS policy and/or guideline but not have that purpose in writing. If there was anything actually in writing that backed up what you and Favre had been arguing, I would have dropped it right then and there. Instead, you have made arguments about ideas that you clearly stated were written in policy, and I have proven that they were not.
I think it's best at this point to let other editors, and possibly even actual administrators, weigh in on the matter at this point. Our arguing back and forth is not getting us anywhere. You have your opinions, I and Pokelova have ours, and I don't think we're going to come to a mutual agreement here. - SanAnMan ( talk) 19:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
It's continued! Can you unlock a page? 31.223.133.218 ( talk) 12:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:South Park season 21 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
"Unlike previous seasons with only ten episodes, season 21 will have three "dark weeks" as announced by the producers. This means the ten episodes will air over 14 weeks with three separate breaks with no episode."
It's not clear if the three dark weeks or the announcement by the producers is the new information in this sentences. And why "only ten episodes". This is not a neutral statement. It's been like this for years and it's misleading for someone who doesn't already know about it. If you read "unlike previous seasons with only ten episodes" for the first time, you would expect the crucial information of the sentence being season 21 having more episodes. -- 88.65.127.178 ( talk) 11:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
User:AussieLegend and User:Favre1fan93 are in dispute over the existence of this article with myself User:SanAnMan and User:Pokelova. Previous discussion regarding the dispute took place on SanAnMan's talk page and Pokelova's talk page.
Also, per WP:NOTTVGUIDE, we do not simply list episode air dates for upcoming episodes with no other info. In this case, a second piece of info is needed (title, director or writers) to have any episode rows unhidden.This is not stated at all in WP:NOTTVGUIDE. And even if it was, there is a second piece of information available, the production codes of the episodes. - SanAnMan ( talk) 16:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Look, I'm not trying to be a troublemaker or anything here, I'm an intelligent author who reads and understands written rules. I'm not just some dumb user. It's not fair to state that you had a purpose in mind when writing a MOS policy and/or guideline but not have that purpose in writing. If there was anything actually in writing that backed up what you and Favre had been arguing, I would have dropped it right then and there. Instead, you have made arguments about ideas that you clearly stated were written in policy, and I have proven that they were not.
I think it's best at this point to let other editors, and possibly even actual administrators, weigh in on the matter at this point. Our arguing back and forth is not getting us anywhere. You have your opinions, I and Pokelova have ours, and I don't think we're going to come to a mutual agreement here. - SanAnMan ( talk) 19:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
It's continued! Can you unlock a page? 31.223.133.218 ( talk) 12:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:South Park season 21 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
"Unlike previous seasons with only ten episodes, season 21 will have three "dark weeks" as announced by the producers. This means the ten episodes will air over 14 weeks with three separate breaks with no episode."
It's not clear if the three dark weeks or the announcement by the producers is the new information in this sentences. And why "only ten episodes". This is not a neutral statement. It's been like this for years and it's misleading for someone who doesn't already know about it. If you read "unlike previous seasons with only ten episodes" for the first time, you would expect the crucial information of the sentence being season 21 having more episodes. -- 88.65.127.178 ( talk) 11:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)