From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nightmare's In

Nightmare was confirmed to be in the game along with Ivy. 207.216.197.154 ( talk) 02:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC) reply

New Characters

A kunoichi (female ninja) trained by Taki is going to be one of the new characters. Ref: http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110715161627/soulcalibur/images/5/5b/NewFemaleNinjaChar.jpg 207.216.222.107 ( talk) 01:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Kilik and Maxi?

When will this info be revealed? -- Ujaj35 ( talk) 15:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for Maxi. -- Ujaj35 ( talk) 20:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Ezio not confirmed

Ezio's been rumored, but there's a good chance that that leak is fake. Don't put him under confirmed until an official source has stated he actually is confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowZeroKaras ( talkcontribs) 05:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Katsuhiro Harada

Would he count as a guest character? He's a pre-made custom character that uses the Devil Jin style.

http://soulcalibur.wikia.com/wiki/Katsuhiro_Harada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.151.194 ( talk) 23:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Characters

The list of Soul characters is located at List of Soul characters.

Also, remember to SOURCE ALL CONTENT. -- 194.145.185.229 ( talk) 17:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Reception

So when will more reviews be added? Looking kind of vacant at the moment. http://www.blisteredthumbs.net/2012/01/soul-calibur-v-review/

There's blisteredthumbs review of the game. They slammed it pretty hard, as the game made alot of changes, though not exactly in ways people liked.-- Chipmonk328 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.89.121.187 ( talk) 17:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Can we just delete the reception section until someone has the time to do it properly? It reads like a bad message board rant as it stands now, listing minor websites and giving opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.30.90 ( talk) 04:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I added the Metacritic scores but I don't have the HTML language skills to fix it or add anything substantial. At least not as the article stands now. If the formatting was better I could try but it seems like a rather pointless effort as the entry currently stands. Oh well. This article here really needs some work done. Rjcripe ( talk) 06:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

What a horrible article

Apparently no one really cares about this game. -- 194.145.185.229 ( talk) 15:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

So when I make an edit, it gets immediately removed by some troll's bot, yet when a true vandal makes an edit, it is gonna stay there for a period of time. All hail Wikipedia Learve ( talk) 05:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I tried to fix it but my HTML skills are seriously lacking. Is there some way to flag an article for admin or mod review? A way to get people with some semi-decent HTML language skill to come in and clean a bit? The article really doesn't need much more content, it just needs to look better than it does right now... Rjcripe ( talk) 06:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

It's a bit better now. -- Jtalledo (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC) reply

It is a bit worse, now. ≈ Learve ( talk) 04:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply

No, it's not. But if it was, you should feel free to be bold and improve it yourself then. As opposed, to you know, just whining. I worked hard to get some actual content and sources in this article, per standards and for somebody just to come along and just tear it down with a whopping six words is not cool. You don't like it? Change it. Or at least say why. -- Jtalledo (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Jtalledo come on, it was such an obvious troll. The article's fine. -- Niemti ( talk) 17:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Japanese Artbook

An artbook was recently released in Japan that contains a ton of background information on Soul Calibur V. Should we mention this? 207.216.193.21 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:40, 8 April 2012 (UTC). reply

The artbook is mentioned, but if you mean citing it as a source, then yes, of course. -- Niemti ( talk) 17:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply

B assessment

It's not bad. It's the sections that are holding back a B assessment. Merge Plot and Characters (make Characters a subsection of Plot), Separate Development and Release. -- JDC808 16:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Tira cosplay pic

Cosplay inspired by Tira in Soulcalibur V

Do you believe cosplay photos of Soulcalibur V characters would be useful here? Here's a pic of Tira cosplay, do you think it should be added? Cogiati ( talk) 20:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nightmare's In

Nightmare was confirmed to be in the game along with Ivy. 207.216.197.154 ( talk) 02:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC) reply

New Characters

A kunoichi (female ninja) trained by Taki is going to be one of the new characters. Ref: http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110715161627/soulcalibur/images/5/5b/NewFemaleNinjaChar.jpg 207.216.222.107 ( talk) 01:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Kilik and Maxi?

When will this info be revealed? -- Ujaj35 ( talk) 15:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for Maxi. -- Ujaj35 ( talk) 20:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Ezio not confirmed

Ezio's been rumored, but there's a good chance that that leak is fake. Don't put him under confirmed until an official source has stated he actually is confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowZeroKaras ( talkcontribs) 05:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Katsuhiro Harada

Would he count as a guest character? He's a pre-made custom character that uses the Devil Jin style.

http://soulcalibur.wikia.com/wiki/Katsuhiro_Harada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.151.194 ( talk) 23:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Characters

The list of Soul characters is located at List of Soul characters.

Also, remember to SOURCE ALL CONTENT. -- 194.145.185.229 ( talk) 17:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Reception

So when will more reviews be added? Looking kind of vacant at the moment. http://www.blisteredthumbs.net/2012/01/soul-calibur-v-review/

There's blisteredthumbs review of the game. They slammed it pretty hard, as the game made alot of changes, though not exactly in ways people liked.-- Chipmonk328 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.89.121.187 ( talk) 17:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Can we just delete the reception section until someone has the time to do it properly? It reads like a bad message board rant as it stands now, listing minor websites and giving opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.30.90 ( talk) 04:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I added the Metacritic scores but I don't have the HTML language skills to fix it or add anything substantial. At least not as the article stands now. If the formatting was better I could try but it seems like a rather pointless effort as the entry currently stands. Oh well. This article here really needs some work done. Rjcripe ( talk) 06:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

What a horrible article

Apparently no one really cares about this game. -- 194.145.185.229 ( talk) 15:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

So when I make an edit, it gets immediately removed by some troll's bot, yet when a true vandal makes an edit, it is gonna stay there for a period of time. All hail Wikipedia Learve ( talk) 05:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I tried to fix it but my HTML skills are seriously lacking. Is there some way to flag an article for admin or mod review? A way to get people with some semi-decent HTML language skill to come in and clean a bit? The article really doesn't need much more content, it just needs to look better than it does right now... Rjcripe ( talk) 06:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

It's a bit better now. -- Jtalledo (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC) reply

It is a bit worse, now. ≈ Learve ( talk) 04:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply

No, it's not. But if it was, you should feel free to be bold and improve it yourself then. As opposed, to you know, just whining. I worked hard to get some actual content and sources in this article, per standards and for somebody just to come along and just tear it down with a whopping six words is not cool. You don't like it? Change it. Or at least say why. -- Jtalledo (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Jtalledo come on, it was such an obvious troll. The article's fine. -- Niemti ( talk) 17:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Japanese Artbook

An artbook was recently released in Japan that contains a ton of background information on Soul Calibur V. Should we mention this? 207.216.193.21 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:40, 8 April 2012 (UTC). reply

The artbook is mentioned, but if you mean citing it as a source, then yes, of course. -- Niemti ( talk) 17:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply

B assessment

It's not bad. It's the sections that are holding back a B assessment. Merge Plot and Characters (make Characters a subsection of Plot), Separate Development and Release. -- JDC808 16:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Tira cosplay pic

Cosplay inspired by Tira in Soulcalibur V

Do you believe cosplay photos of Soulcalibur V characters would be useful here? Here's a pic of Tira cosplay, do you think it should be added? Cogiati ( talk) 20:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook