Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon ( talk · contribs) 15:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply

• Image: The image is being considered for deletion, sort this out; might I suggest adding a better rationale than just "To illustrate a key element of the plot."

It was fine when I nominated the article. I've tried to flesh out the rationale as much as possible and have emphasised comments in the reception section which discuss this as a plot development.

• Lede: Link 'second series'

Linked.

• Plot: I feel that 'synopsis' under plot is kind of redundant, since there isn't another section

Removed subheading.

• Plot: "half-eaten corpse" Who's corpse is this?

Clarified.

• References: I believe you should always have a reference tag after a direct quote. For instance, after "…commonly seen on soaps"; "…good performances from the team"; "cheesy soap opera moments"; etc.

WP:CITEFOOT just states "it is usually sufficient to add the citation to the end of the sentence or paragraph, so long as it's clear which source supports which part of the text". I think it's clear that in the case of the reviews that the direct quotes are attributed the review cited. I feel that having the same reference used successively looks a bit untidy, but I'm happy to change it if necessary.

• References: Ref 10 I would just cite as "Andy et al, p. 82"

Done.

• References: Ref 14 seems to have broken link to Digital Spy

Fixed.

• Bibliography: I would order this alphabetically

Done.

Those are the only issues. On hold for seven days.-- Gen. Quon ( talk) 03:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks very much for your prompt review! Eshlare ( talk) 05:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply

No problem. I think everything looks fine. I'm going to keep it on hold until the picture deal is sorted out, though.-- Gen. Quon ( talk) 14:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Excellent. Pic problem has cleared up. Passing. Congrats!-- Gen. Quon ( talk) 02:34, 24 May 2012 (UTC) reply