Something Borrowed (Torchwood) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 24, 2012 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who: Torchwood Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Torchwood task force. Television: Episode coverage Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Wales Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

When Jack was going through the pictures of himself, there was one of his wedding day. Was that Estelle, or was it Gwyneth, or was it somebody else altogether? My eyes sort of couldn't tell.~ Zythe ^{Talk to me!} 22:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Someone else, someone who hasn't been on the show before Starhunterfan ( talk) 00:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Would it be worth mentioning that Tainted Love was playing at the end of the disco, having previously been heard in The End of the World (Doctor Who)? 90.204.163.238 ( talk) 22:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Not really... there's no story conection. — Edokter • Talk • 23:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Who played the Lady in Black (Nostrovite)? shouldn't that be added to the cast list? AlbertHall ( talk) 14:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Is this corect? (I have not seen this episode but this looks like creatove vandalism)

Her presence is detected by Tosh and Banana.

Nope... his name is really Banana. -- 66.167.244.240 ( talk) 19:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Something Borrowed (Torchwood)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon ( talk · contribs) 15:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply

• Image: The image is being considered for deletion, sort this out; might I suggest adding a better rationale than just "To illustrate a key element of the plot."

It was fine when I nominated the article. I've tried to flesh out the rationale as much as possible and have emphasised comments in the reception section which discuss this as a plot development.

• Lede: Link 'second series'

Linked.

• Plot: I feel that 'synopsis' under plot is kind of redundant, since there isn't another section

Removed subheading.

• Plot: "half-eaten corpse" Who's corpse is this?

Clarified.

• References: I believe you should always have a reference tag after a direct quote. For instance, after "…commonly seen on soaps"; "…good performances from the team"; "cheesy soap opera moments"; etc.

WP:CITEFOOT just states "it is usually sufficient to add the citation to the end of the sentence or paragraph, so long as it's clear which source supports which part of the text". I think it's clear that in the case of the reviews that the direct quotes are attributed the review cited. I feel that having the same reference used successively looks a bit untidy, but I'm happy to change it if necessary.

• References: Ref 10 I would just cite as "Andy et al, p. 82"

Done.

• References: Ref 14 seems to have broken link to Digital Spy

Fixed.

• Bibliography: I would order this alphabetically

Done.

Those are the only issues. On hold for seven days.-- Gen. Quon ( talk) 03:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks very much for your prompt review! Eshlare ( talk) 05:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply

No problem. I think everything looks fine. I'm going to keep it on hold until the picture deal is sorted out, though.-- Gen. Quon ( talk) 14:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Excellent. Pic problem has cleared up. Passing. Congrats!-- Gen. Quon ( talk) 02:34, 24 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Something Borrowed (Torchwood). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130128231442/http://blogs.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2008/03/square-eyes-1013-march/ to http://blogs.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2008/03/square-eyes-1013-march/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101203031528/http://totalscifionline.com/reviews/1697-torchwood-something-borrowed-series-2-episode-9 to http://totalscifionline.com/reviews/1697-torchwood-something-borrowed-series-2-episode-9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply