![]() | Solorina crocea has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 5, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Solorina crocea appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 18:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Happy to offer a review.
There are a few small inconsistencies in the referencing, but certainly not anything I should be picking fault with at GAC. All sources look fine, and two spotchecks looked good. Other images fine. Please check my edits. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Great! I've no further comments. If this was at FAC, I think I might be worried that the article comes across as a little technical. But I appreciate more than anyone (as a non-scientist mycophile!) how technical the subject is. Josh Milburn ( talk) 19:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
18:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Esculenta ( talk). Nominated by LordPeterII ( talk) at 21:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC).
the "chocolate chip" name refers to the large brownish fruitbodies (ascomata), which have an appearance similar to chocolate(article wording). Thus I propose
This is an article about a fungus, but for some reason the article calls it a "lichen". That's like calling a grass an "ecosystem". It includes the algal symbiont as a mere adjunct of the fungus (or something, it really isn't even that clear).
Would anyone object to my fixing it call S. crocea a fungus, which after all is what it is? IAmNitpicking ( talk) 18:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Solorina crocea has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 5, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Solorina crocea appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 18:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Happy to offer a review.
There are a few small inconsistencies in the referencing, but certainly not anything I should be picking fault with at GAC. All sources look fine, and two spotchecks looked good. Other images fine. Please check my edits. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Great! I've no further comments. If this was at FAC, I think I might be worried that the article comes across as a little technical. But I appreciate more than anyone (as a non-scientist mycophile!) how technical the subject is. Josh Milburn ( talk) 19:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
18:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Esculenta ( talk). Nominated by LordPeterII ( talk) at 21:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC).
the "chocolate chip" name refers to the large brownish fruitbodies (ascomata), which have an appearance similar to chocolate(article wording). Thus I propose
This is an article about a fungus, but for some reason the article calls it a "lichen". That's like calling a grass an "ecosystem". It includes the algal symbiont as a mere adjunct of the fungus (or something, it really isn't even that clear).
Would anyone object to my fixing it call S. crocea a fungus, which after all is what it is? IAmNitpicking ( talk) 18:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)